Green Lantern Review: The Power of Ryan Reynolds' Abs

Categories: Film

greenlantern.jpg

It's 10 minutes before a human character appears on-screen in Green Lantern, a personality-free franchise-launcher that builds toward a quaint, if explosive, argument in favor of the nebulous quality of "humanity."

Via a heavily CGI'd prologue, we learn that The Universe is patrolled by a group of fearless, multi-species warriors called The Green Lantern Corps--and, yes, each member is issued an actual old-school camping lantern, which they use to recharge the clunky rings that allow them to harness "the emerald energy of willpower" to "create what you see in your mind." A new threat known as the Parallax--illustrated as a constantly morphing mass of something like flesh blended with rock, almost an Anselm Kiefer construction anthropomorphized--has managed to kill four members of the Corps, including an arrogant purple humanoid alien who crashes on Earth and uses his last breaths to command that his ring seek out his replacement.

The ring ropes in Hal Jordan (Ryan Reynolds), a bad-boy but regular-old-human pilot given to a specific brand of cockiness that manifests itself via conspicuous self-deprecation. "I may be a total screw-up in every other part of life, but the one thing I do know how to do is fly," he says, after nearly dying in a test-flight exercise when he's suddenly distracted by an attack of convenient exposition--er, that is, an uncontrollable flashback to the plane-crash death of his own dad. Hal doesn't give himself enough credit: He also knows how to flirt, often via terrible double entendre, with Carol (Blake Lively), a former girlfriend now in line to run her father's aircraft company.

Shortly after the ring finds him, Hal is transported via a green energy bubble into space, where he meets Lantern leader Sinestro (Mark Strong), an alien who is skeptical that a human could have the skill and intelligence to make it in the Corps. Hal, ever the self-saboteur, is also sure there must have been some kind of mistake, and he takes the first opportunity to escape this new assignment. But then the Parallax gets its hooks into Hector (Peter Sarsgaard), a scientist creepily obsessed with Carol, and from there somehow it becomes apparent that the future of the Earth is in danger, so, you know. . . .

I could easily fill pages running down the plot obstacles that Lantern director Martin Campbell soullessly cycles through; identifying all the characters introduced by the film's four screenwriters, only to be easily disposed of; and "explaining" the complete hodgepodge of psychological cause-and-effects, from the pervasive daddy issues and complete absence of mothers, to the arbitrary, less-than-convincing confidence issues that Hal is able to surmount as soon as it becomes clear that Carol really wants to kiss him. But the movie never bothers to suggest that any of that really matters: Campbell's ADD style privileges spectacle over story--so much so that the film never rewards the viewer for even trying to keep track of what is going on.

So you give up, and instead try to grab on to the small pleasures, which momentarily distract from the fact that the narrative is nonsensical, the characters so boilerplate that their every action seem preordained from the earliest frames, even as the action on-screen is often incoherent. Sarsgaard, with a major latex assist, gives a grand camp performance only rivaled in the last 12 months by Michael Sheen in Tron: Legacy. While hardly even registering as a villain, the Parallax is a breathtaking visual idea--roasting its victims alive while simultaneously slurping up their flesh, the entire maneuver rendered as a lacy spray of golden fire and charcoal ash.

This is pure cinematic magic, but the motives of the menace are muddled if not completely opaque. And while Reynolds isn't a sharp enough actor to really find the crackle in his standard-issue superhero wisecracks, his body is a marvel of precision sculpting. As he breathes in and out in the skin-tight, digitally enhanced Lantern suit, each abdominal muscle seems to pulse independently. It's transfixing--and the closest Green Lantern gets to character detail.

My Voice Nation Help
9 comments
Peter
Peter

Green Lantern is a 2011 superhero film based on the DC Comics character of the same name. Millions of years before the Earth was formed, a group of beings called the Guardians of the Universe used the green essence of willpower to create an intergalactic police force called the Green Lantern Corps. They split the universe into 3,600 sectors, with one Green Lantern per sector.Each Green Lantern possesses a power ring and power lantern that gives the user great control over the physical world.

Dan O'Neill
Dan O'Neill

The mythology is nonsensical and the plot takes forever to get going. But once it does, the movie takes advantage of a strong cast and a director who knows what he’s doing. Good Review! Check out mine when you can!

Dan O'Neill
Dan O'Neill

The mythology is nonsensical and the plot takes forever to get going. But once it does, the movie takes advantage of a strong cast and a director who knows what he’s doing. Good Review! Check out mine when you can!

nicole.vega
nicole.vega

The movie certainly alluded to a plot, but I still had fun watching it. I work for DISH Network and although I’m up to speed on a lot of comic to movie characters GL was one I needed more background on. I searched Green Lantern on DISHonline and found interviews, clips and the cartoon animations of GL. It’s worth checking out to help fill in some gaps that I needed to better understand this superhero. http://bit.ly/dJzWgo

Pink Frankenstein
Pink Frankenstein

I wish people would just review the movie without the bulk of the article being a synopsis of the plot. 

landogriffin
landogriffin

No offence... But to spend so much time talking about someone's physical appearance takes away for the seriousness of your review. Besides, you go to a movie called "Green Lantern" don't expect to see "Citizen Kane".

Durk Durp
Durk Durp

So much time talking about physical appearance? It was only one paragraph.

And a movie doesn't have to be "Citizen Kane" to "not suck," which this movie apparently does according to the majority of the reviews out so far.

landogriffin
landogriffin

Outside of Spider-Man 2 and The Dark Knight, comic book movies are NOT art. Is this a perfect movie? No. But is it any worse than most of the other comic book movies out there? That's also a no. Critics have slammed Green Lantern, but have liked Thor. But they are very similar movie in terms of tone and theme. The difference? Critics have seen Ryan Reynolds in movies like Van Wilder and have seen his abs on countless fitness magazines. So it's easy for them to come into the film with bias against him as an actor. Chris Hemsworth is a relative new comer, so when he walks in without a shirt on, "He's in great shape." But Ryan Renolds walks in without a shirt and the tagline on this and many other reviews is "The Power of Ryan Reynolds' Abs." It's sad. All I was saying in my original post was, leave the remarks of someone's appearance out of it. It cheapens your credibility as a critics. You should be more Roger Ebert than Chelsea Handler.

Booger
Booger

so...thumbs down?

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Los Angeles Event Tickets
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city