Los Angeles Ballet Needs More Than a Bland Swan Lake

Categories: Dance

Photocomposition by Reed Hutchinson & Catherine Kanner
Allynne Noelle as that trickster, the black swan

First, a recap. Or as they say on television (in voiceover), previously, on Los Angeles Ballet...

The drama of six months ago, recorded in an L.A. Weekly story, centered on dancer complaints and signs of trouble at Los Angeles Ballet, the ambitious fledgling company started in 2006 by husband-and-wife artistic directors Colleen Neary and Thordal Christensen. The company has been a revolving door of dancers, with an unusually high turnover rate. Neary denied there was anything amiss, saying that because Los Angeles Ballet is a startup company, fluctuations were "natural," and not evidence of a problem.

Flash-forward to this past weekend. Los Angeles Ballet kicked off its sixth repertory season at Royce Hall with a big gamble -- a traditional four-act production of Peter Tchaikovsky's Swan Lake.

This production is not the avian nest of sexual repression a la Black Swan.

Neary and Christensen opted for a straightforward, basic reading of the iconic, 1895 ballet. This work is an enormous risk for a young troupe with limited experience as an ensemble. The co-directors trimmed crucial mime sequences (leaving the story opaque). Step sequences were simplified. Acting was muted. The ending was a head scratcher, with the evil sorcerer defeated but the swans still enchanted, Odette alive and the Prince alone center stage. With 32 dancers, L.A. Ballet doesn't have enough bodies for a full cast of peasants, noblemen, character dancers and swans (they fielded a respectable 16). Everyone was doing double and triple duty.

That meant changing costumes during each of the three intervals. So we waited. And waited. Intermissions lasted 30 minutes or more. The ballet ran an overly long three and a half hours.

Patience was at least partially rewarded, thanks primarily to Allynne Noelle, who made her debut Saturday night as the enchanted Swan Queen Odette and her evil look-alike, Odile. (An alternate cast features Allyssa Bross and Christopher Revels.) Noelle was both poignant and authoritative, and particularly effective as the white swan. She cast a lovely glow as the sorrowful enchanted female, with her tilted head and wavering arms. Her strong legs and powerful back helped her triumph through rigorous solos.

The swans of the corps de ballet struggled with uneven lines and their toe shoes, clomping loudly. They will certainly improve with more stage time and practice as the run continues throughout March. Their gestures already have the beginnings of a feathery lightness, suggesting a breeze under their wings. The pas de quatre of four linked swans was a well-timed success.

Other individual artists also excelled. As the Jester, guest artist Akimitsu Yahata delivered requisite virtuosity with grace and cheery enthusiasm. Kenta Shimizu, as the Prince, was a subdued but always accurate soloist and a steadfast partner for Noelle. Neapolitan soloists Isabel Vondermuhll and Christopher McDaniel brought a surfeit of spunkiness to their leaps and beats. Finally, the group waltz for the six princesses nicely matched the score's lyricism.

It's hard to see, however, how rushing into a bland Swan Lake helps Los Angeles Ballet's cause. Neary and Christensen began the company dedicated to masterpieces they know expertly and intimately -- the ballets of George Balanchine and August Bournonville. They seem to have changed course. Last season, there was a serviceable but uninspired Giselle and now Swan Lake.

Audiences do come out for ballets they know, and Royce Hall was certainly well-filled. One wonders, however, if the dance audience -- and L.A. does have one -- was there, and if it will return again for lesser versions of the classics. After all, audiences can buy tickets (at comparable prices) later this season to opulent productions of Swan Lake by those Russian behemoths, the Bolshoi and Maryinsky. That's the never-ending challenge of these roiling waters.

Swam Lake is at the Redondo Beach Performing Arts Center, 1935 Manhattan Beach Blvd., Redondo Beach, 7:30 p.m. March 10; Alex Theatre, 216 N. Brand Blvd., Glendale, 7:30 p.m. March 17; Carpenter Performing Arts Center, 6200 Atherton St., Long Beach, 7:30 p.m. March 24; Valley Performing Arts Center, 18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, 7:30 p.m., March 31. (310) 998-7782, www.losangelesballet.org

Follow us on Twitter at @LAWeeklyArts and like us on Facebook.

My Voice Nation Help
34 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Caite
Caite

I've just looked in on Los Angeles Ballet's website where reviews are posted openly from the earliest performances to the present. Laura Bleiberg's reviews up to a year or so ago were fair and balanced. What happened? She seems to have lost the objective eye required of a reviewer. This review of Swan Lake appears to be ax-grinding...and not up to the standards of the Weekly. I saw Swan Lake at Royce Hall, and although not perfect, certainly was wonderful in many ways, and worthy of fair criticism.

JM
JM

I found the review very objective, and typical of arts reviews in many publications, such as the L A Times, San Francisco Chronicle or New York Times. Bleiberg says quite a few very positive and encouraging things about this performance as well as pointing out what didn't work.I have read much harshers critiques.How is this a "hatchet job" or "ax grinding?" Why the angry outcry? If LAB is truly a world class ballet company, then this comes with the territory. Ticket prices are high, and the public is capable of reading all the reviews, good and bad, and  making their decision as to whether to attend or not. It is clear that Bleiberg's agenda is to provide intelligent and informed critical content to her readers. Do do otherwise, to write an insincere glowing review, just to show support for LAB, would be an insult to these artists.The topic of dancer turn-over is also mentioned in the Perlmutter article. This is a legitimate topic of discussion within the dance community. I just don't get the extreme defensiveness, especially from a member of LAB's management.  

Michael Andreas
Michael Andreas

I'm hardly consider myself a member of the management, but to address your post;  Ms. B. is one of many critics who have reviewed LAB performances.  Not all of these have been glowing reviews but, they always seemed fair to me and LAB has always posted these (good & not-so-good) on its website www.LosAngelesBallet.orgWith this understanding, the piece on dancer turnover was in my opinion as in 'insider,' so one-sided, that to me, an ''agenda' seemed to be in play.  Then, the Swan Lake review was not only misinformed, if you read it again, I believe you will see how she starts it off with her continuing fairly harsh criticism of the company's Artisitic Directors.  In short (and this is SOLELY my opinion and not that of the Company) it seems to me that Ms. Bleiberg has decided what SHE would like Los Angeles' major ballet company to be and LAB doesn't fit HER vision.  Unfortunately, that doesn't make for a very balanced critique.  We'll leave it up to our audience. 

Jsmith
Jsmith

Maybe she's being influenced by some has-been dancer who couldn't maintain their position in the company? Its so sad how low people go. That woman needs to not review them anymore. If she's gonna be unprofessional and hit below the belt and just be bitchy, she needs to write for a tabloid mag or something.

The arts, ballet more so, in LA are struggling enough, how dare she use her platform to contribute to the demolition of what has the potential to be a great ballet company in LA!

Lalaculture
Lalaculture

I urge everyone to read the review of this production that appeared in the Pasadena Sun a couple of days ago.  It was written by a very knowledgeable ballet critic who wrote a biography of Antony Tudor, one of the true giants of 20th century choreography.  This writer, Donna Perlmutter, is the person to whom we should be paying attention.  Let's all stop giving this Bleiberg creature the time of day.  She has no credibility.

Here is the link for a review written by a REAL dance critic:http://www.pasadenasun.com/ent...

Michael Andreas
Michael Andreas

Apologies for the way my post is displaying... can't figure out why the body repeats itself...

Anonymous
Anonymous

Bravo to you!  Everyone should read Donna Perlmutters very credible review in the Pasadena Sun. She is the author of a biography of Antony Tudor, a titan of choreography in the 20th century and she is truly knowledgeable about all aspects of ballet.

bunhead
bunhead

Donna Perlmutter's article is not a review! It is a piece previewing an upcoming performance in Glendale. I look forward to her opinion after she has seen the performance.

Michael Andreas
Michael Andreas

Here are few misconceptions in Ms. Bleiberg's most recent hatchet job on LAB:

1.  Ms. Bleiberg displays her ignorance when she suggest that the intermissions were long because of the time it takes dancers to change costumes, which on average takes less than 2 minutes. The reason for the long intermissions was the size and complication of the set. The unfortunately long delay between opening night's Acts 2 & 3 was that there was a technical problem with one of the lighting fixtures that added 10 minutes to the intermission.  It had nothing to do with the time it took for dancers to change costume.  The next afternoon, the complete performance (including an immediate standing ovation that went on for 5 minutes), ran just over three hours and in Redondo Beach it was down to 3-hours on the dot.  2.  Ms. Bleiberg seems to be criticizing us for not having enough bodies on stage.  33 weren't enough for her?  LAB's Swan Lake incorporates a giant set... there just isn't enough room for more dancers... period.  Large portions of our rehearsals were spent impressing on our dancers just how small our performance area would be.  Perhaps Ms. Bleiberg is decrying the fact that we cannot yet afford a company of 80 dancers, but meanwhile our dancers have the chance to dance... a lot , improving their craft in the process.  In the large companies, the majority of dancers are window dressing.  In addition, the companies that she touted as bringing their "opulent productions of Swan Lake to Los Angeles those Russian behemoths, the Bolshoi and Maryinsky" (usually spelled Mariinsky) are all state sponsored.  So rather than attacking us for not giving her enough dancers for her to shred, I would suggest that placing her attention on the fact that our government has been cutting Arts funding for at least a decade would be a much more productive use of her pulpit.3.  Most everything else in this article is subjective.  Of course, we at LAB are open to criticism when it is due and especially when it is creative.  But, misinformed and biased articles like the ones Ms. Bleiberg has written here in the Weekly serve no one well; neither her paper, her community nor her reputation as a writer.An entire audience leaps to its chanting "Bravo" because they have been touched by the performance they"ve just experienced.  LAB has now completed its third performance of Swan Lake (this one at the Redondo Beach PAC) to a sold out crowd that immediately rose in roaring approval for the performance.  Maybe our audience isn't the "BALLET" audience Ms. Bleiberg refers to and maybe they came out to see Swan Lake because they saw the movie and wanted to see the real thing but, for whatever reason, they came and it touched them.  So, I might suggest Ms. Bleiberg look to herself to see what has caused her to lose touch with her audience.  We haven't.I urge all interested Angelinos to come see for yourselves.  You may not be part of Ms. Bleiberg's "BALLET AUDIENCE" but you are certainly welcome to be part of ours.Michael AndreasMusic Director, Los Angeles Ballet 2.  Ms. Bleiberg seems to be criticizing us for not having enough bodies on stage.  33 weren't enough for her?  LAB's Swan Lake incorporates a giant set... there just isn't enough room for more dancers... period.  Large portions of our rehearsals were spent impressing on our dancers just how small our performance area would be.  Perhaps Ms. Bleiberg is decrying the fact that we cannot yet afford a company of 80 dancers, but meanwhile our dancers have the chance to dance... a lot , improving their craft in the process.  In the large companies, the majority of dancers are window dressing.  In addition, the companies that she touted as bringing their "opulent productions of Swan Lake to Los Angeles those Russian behemoths, the Bolshoi and Maryinsky" (usually spelled Mariinsky) are all state sponsored.  So rather than attacking us for not giving her enough dancers for her to shred, I would suggest that placing her attention on the fact that our government has been cutting Arts funding for at least a decade would be a much more productive use of her pulpit.3.  Most everything else in this article is subjective.  Of course, we at LAB are open to criticism when it is due and especially when it is creative.  But, misinformed and biased articles like the ones Ms. Bleiberg has written here in the Weekly serve no one well; neither her paper, her community nor her reputation as a writer.An entire audience leaps to its chanting "Bravo" because they have been touched by the performance they"ve just experienced.  LAB has now completed its third performance of Swan Lake (this one at the Redondo Beach PAC) to a sold out crowd that immediately rose in roaring approval for the performance.  Maybe our audience isn't the "BALLET" audience Ms. Bleiberg refers to and maybe they came out to see Swan Lake because they saw the movie and wanted to see the real thing but, for whatever reason, they came and it touched them.  So, I might suggest Ms. Bleiberg look to herself to see what has caused her to lose touch with her audience.  We haven't.I urge all interested Angelinos to come see for yourselves.  You may not be part of Ms. Bleiberg's "BALLET AUDIENCE" but you are certainly welcome to be part of ours.Michael AndreasMusic Director, Los Angeles Ballet

Anne Marie
Anne Marie

"LAB is open to criticism when it is due"....  Who decides when it is due?You certainly dont seem open to criticism to me.Laura Bleiberg does have some nice things to say as well.  As a reviewer, she is entitled to her opinion and as the public, we can decide for ourselves,  without the help of a defensive management.If LAB is going to survive and prosper in this city,  it would be wise if they developed a thicker skin.

Michael Andreas
Michael Andreas

You're right Anne Marie, I should have been clearer.... criticism (when helpful) it is always due.  Of course, this brings up the question of what is 'helpful' criticism. I agree that Ms. Bleiberg had some very nice things to say about the dancers in the body of her article. I also agree that some of her criticism was fair.  My only problem is that these two articles seem to have a bias against LAB as an organization (at the very least, their bylines give that impression).  The best way I can relate this is in referring to the L.A. Times music critic Mark Swed's relationship with the Los Angeles Phil.  Sometimes he can be very 'critical' of a performance or performer but, it is always with the clear understanding that he is a supporter of the L.A. Phil. You can see (or at least I can) that all along, he wanted the Phil to be the world class orchestra it has become.  LAB needs championing.  It needs it from our audience, from our local government, our community AND from our reviewers.  If that were the starting point, then all ensuing criticism would be fair. 

Jsmith
Jsmith

[Constructive] Critism is always due, but full on bitchiness is absurd! Who cites their own obnoxious article? WHY start the review that way? Mocking the company? Its rude, and unprofessional. Why was it relevent to bring up the "high turnover rate?" That has NOTHING to do with the production. Maybe about of ppl leaving is that they're tired of being attacked by "critics." She has a hidden agenda and its not so hidden. So while the management looks for thicker skin, she needs to look for lessons in fair reviewing.

Its exhausting to watch those young dancers give their all just to have some bitter woman write stupid uncalled for things. SHE NEEDS TO FIGURE HER STUFF OUT AND GET OVER IT. LAB IS HERE AND THEY ARE FINDING THEIR WAY. SHE SHOULD BE TRYING TO HELP. NOT TEAR IT DOWN.

Michael Andreas
Michael Andreas

Apologies for the typoed version of my post below (which I've flagged to be removed)... I will enter the correct version now. 

Michael Andreas
Michael Andreas

Here are few misconceptions in Ms. Bleiberg's most recent hatchet job on LAB:  1.  Ms. Bleiberg displays her ignorance when she suggest that the intermissions were long because of the time it takes dancers to change costumes, which on average takes less than 2 minutes. The reason for the long intermissions was the size and complication of the set. unfortunately long delay between opening night's Acts 2 & 3 was that there was a technical problem with one of the lighting fixtures that added 10 minutes to the intermission.  It had nothing to do with the time it took for dancers to change costume.  The next afternoon, the complete performance (including an immediate standing ovation that went on for 5 minutes), ran just over three hours and in Redondo Beach it was down to 3-hours on the dot. 2.  Ms. Bleiberg seems to be criticizing us for not having enough bodies on stage.  33 weren't enough for her?  LAB's Swan Lake incorporates a giant set, there just isn't enough room for more dancers, period.  Large portions of our rehearsals were spent impressing on our dancers just how small our performance area would be.  Perhaps Ms. Bleiberg is decrying the fact that we cannot yet afford a company of 80 dancers, but meanwhile our dancers have the chance to dance... a lot, improving their craft in the process.  In the large companies, the majority of dancers are window dressing.  In addition, the companies that she touted as bringing their "opulent productions of Swan Lake to Los Angeles those Russian behemoths, the Bolshoi and Maryinsky" (usually spelled Mariinsky) are all state sponsored.  So rather than attacking us for not giving her enough dancers for her to shred, I would suggest that placing her attention on the fact that our government has been cutting Arts funding for at least a decade would be a much more productive use of her pulpit.3.  Most everything else in this article is subjective.  Of course, we at LAB are open to criticism when it is due and especially when it is creative.  But, misinformed and biased articles like the ones Ms. Bleiberg has written here in the Weekly serve no one well; neither her paper, her community nor her reputation as a writer.An audience leaps to its feet cheering "Bravo" because they have been touched by the performance they've just experienced.  LAB has now completed its third performance of Swan Lake (this one at the Redondo Beach PAC) to a sold out crowd that leapt to their feet in roaring approval for the performance.  Maybe our audience isn't the "BALLET" audience Ms. Bleiberg refers to and maybe they came out to see Swan Lake because they saw the movie and wanted to see the real thing but, for whatever reason, they came and it touched them.  So, I might suggest Ms. Bleiberg look to herself to see what has caused her to lose touch with her audience.  We haven't.  I urge all interested Angelinos to come see for yourselves.  You may not be part of Ms. Bleiberg's "BALLET AUDIENCE" but you are certainly welcome to be part of ours.Michael AndreasMusic Director, Los Angeles Ballet 1.  Ms. Bleiberg displays her ignorance when she suggest that the intermissions were long because of the time it takes dancers to change costumes, which on average takes less than 2 minutes. The reason for the long intermissions was the size and complication of the set. unfortunately long delay between opening night's Acts 2 & 3 was that there was a technical problem with one of the lighting fixtures that added 10 minutes to the intermission.  It had nothing to do with the time it took for dancers to change costume.  The next afternoon, the complete performance (including an immediate standing ovation that went on for 5 minutes), ran just over three hours and in Redondo Beach it was down to 3-hours on the dot. 2.  Ms. Bleiberg seems to be criticizing us for not having enough bodies on stage.  33 weren't enough for her?  LAB's Swan Lake incorporates a giant set, there just isn't enough room for more dancers, period.  Large portions of our rehearsals were spent impressing on our dancers just how small our performance area would be.  Perhaps Ms. Bleiberg is decrying the fact that we cannot yet afford a company of 80 dancers, but meanwhile our dancers have the chance to dance... a lot, improving their craft in the process.  In the large companies, the majority of dancers are window dressing.  In addition, the companies that she touted as bringing their "opulent productions of Swan Lake to Los Angeles those Russian behemoths, the Bolshoi and Maryinsky" (usually spelled Mariinsky) are all state sponsored.  So rather than attacking us for not giving her enough dancers for her to shred, I would suggest that placing her attention on the fact that our government has been cutting Arts funding for at least a decade would be a much more productive use of her pulpit.3.  Most everything else in this article is subjective.  Of course, we at LAB are open to criticism when it is due and especially when it is creative.  But, misinformed and biased articles like the ones Ms. Bleiberg has written here in the Weekly serve no one well; neither her paper, her community nor her reputation as a writer.An audience leaps to its feet cheering "Bravo" because they have been touched by the performance they've just experienced.  LAB has now completed its third performance of Swan Lake (this one at the Redondo Beach PAC) to a sold out crowd that leapt to their feet in roaring approval for the performance.  Maybe our audience isn't the "BALLET" audience Ms. Bleiberg refers to and maybe they came out to see Swan Lake because they saw the movie and wanted to see the real thing but, for whatever reason, they came and it touched them.  So, I might suggest Ms. Bleiberg look to herself to see what has caused her to lose touch with her audience.  We haven't.  I urge all interested Angelinos to come see for yourselves.  You may not be part of Ms. Bleiberg's "BALLET AUDIENCE" but you are certainly welcome to be part of ours.Michael AndreasMusic Director, Los Angeles Ballet

Archie Leach
Archie Leach

Don't know.  Tough call.

The Russian and the European and the Big Three American companies ARE the standards which you look to and it would be dishonest if Bleiberg didn't at least look towards those standards in making judgement......however the reality that LA Ballet is a young regional company and applying THOSE standards just isn't realistic.

Perhaps the best of all worlds are adherence to the high standards with the understanding they're not easily applicable to young regional companies like LA Ballet.

Congratulations LAB!!
Congratulations LAB!!

And guess what!

Encouraging reviews= public interest= ticket sales= more money= more shows= more dancers/ less triple duty/ shorter intermissions/ live music/ etc.

Come on LA, aren't you sick of being the only major US city who doesn't take pride in your world class ballet resident company? It begins with you.

Congratulations LAB!!
Congratulations LAB!!

Believe it or not, there were quite a few former dancers approached for the summer article who were smart enough to know that their positive comments would be spun in a negative light, or not included at all. Alas, we remained silent. It is too bad that this woman is so set on sabotaging this company...especially when many of its former dancers want only success and prosperity for LAB's valiant efforts.

karc
karc

it's spelled mariinsky. 

Janet
Janet

I liked the performance and so did my kids. BTW, who is Benjamin Millepied?

ArtsLover
ArtsLover

Frankly, I felt the production was well done. I think Laura has a stick up her behind and needs to get over herself. WHO cites there own bitchy article? that has NOTHING to do with Swan Lake. She needs to get over whatever personal vendetta she has against the company. 'a bland Swan lake won't help the company..' well neither will an incredibly bitchy review!

YES Swan Lake was a big step, but instead of waiting for it to fail, all of you so called ballet supporters should be trying to see what can be done to help the productions and the company so it doesn't look "BLAND"

those dancers work their asses off! how dare you just attack them time and time again! You put on some pointe shoes (that won't clomp) and dance Swan Lake better... 

Anonymous
Anonymous

There were 18 swans in the corps de ballet-- 2 big swans entered after the main entrance of the first 16.

Micharden145
Micharden145

The reviewer's "problem" is that she accurately reviewed a dismal production of a classic ballet that is usually only attempted by world class companies and ballerinas.  Frankly, my review would have been harsher.  Yes, we have given them a chance - six seasons - and  Los Angeles Ballet is nothing more now than it was when it started -  mediocre.  Los Angeles doesn't deserve  an "ambitious effort."  Go see the Bolshoi in June !  I can guarantee you  there will be no "clomping."  Benjamin Millepied  - We need you !!  Merde !!

balletaddict
balletaddict

You know what mister....u obviously don't know what the heck your talking about....Ive seen LAB's swan lake and it was one of the best productions ive ever seen way better then the Bolshoi and im sure Benjamin will fail his ego will get in the way and it will suck.....DOnt see Bolshoi in JUNE!

ArtsLover
ArtsLover

Ben Millepied had put HORRIBLE ballet after ballet on stage at NYCB! why do we NEED him here? Stupid comment! 

Ellen1
Ellen1

How many more years are we going to give this "fledgling" company to pull itself together before we give someone  else the chance to be this city's ballet company?   Taking on a classic the likes of Swan Lake with a bunch of green dancers fresh out of ballet school just makes LAB look more amateur than ever.  What were they thinking? 

Believeinart
Believeinart

If you truly love fine art, you should be excited and intrigued to watch young dancers grow with each production, and even each performance.  To know that LA has its own viable ballet company with youth, beauty, and energy (something LA is obsessed with) eager to grow and mature, arts supporters, should be pleased to do exactly that: support.  No one is asking everyone to be raving, in love, always with every program, every production, but merely show support for young, talented artists, working extremely hard at their jobs to bring beauty and art to not only LA, but the world. 

ArtsLover
ArtsLover

Rome wasn't build in a day. Does ANY 6 year old have it ALL together? I don't think so, SO, after only 6 years of existence, i think it's quite astonishing that they performed Swan Lake! in addition with a company that small, the fact that those 'fresh out of school' dancers can do triple duty says something about their abilities. 

LalaCulture
LalaCulture

Okay, watch companies from Chicago and Seattle and every other city in the US come here. Just be sure that you know what you are talking about when you put down your own city's company. Are you truly savvy enough about dance/ballet/music/etc.coming here from other places to compare them to LA's efforts?

Caguy
Caguy

Okay. So dream on....You may say that you think LA deserves "better", but what are your suggestions for a solution? How long do you think that the Bolshoi and other companies from the long defunct Soviet system will be able to tour the world with its faded remnants? Look, and more importantly listen carefully (clomp, clomp, clomp) when you go to see them in June. Let's let LA remain in the cultural doldrums forever. We should continue to bow at the feet of Hollywood----Wow Natalie---Wow Benjamin Millepied! We had never heard of you (Benjy) before "Black Swan", but now let's be impressed because your "fiancee's" movie sold a lot of tickets last year. So much for LA culture....

Hbsweetypye16
Hbsweetypye16

WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM!? GIVE THEM A CHANCE FOR GOODNESS' SAKE!

Jsmith
Jsmith

I agree. it's as if some dancer who didn't make the cut hired her to write articles with a hidden agenda or something! sheesh! GET OVER YOUR ISSUES AND JUST REVIEW THE ART! 

PAM3196
PAM3196

I saw this production on both Saturday and Sunday. I disagree with many of the reviewer's comments. It was a lovely, ambitious effort. Yes, the intermissions may have been too long, but many of Bleiberg's comments are not accurate. The corps did an admirable job and looked very elegantly swan-like. And dancing on pointe, especially with a large cast that is required for a production like this, of course will produce the clomping noise she describes. Why don't you just include a schedule of foreign companies' upcoming schedules of performances of the classics to make it even easier for LA audiences to not support this wonderful, new company? Yes, yes, give this company it's deserved credit!

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Health & Beauty

Los Angeles Event Tickets
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city