The Apparently True Story of the Man Who Secured Gay Lovers for Old Hollywood

Categories: Hollywood, Sex

Raymond Burr: His longtime partner confirms that they met thanks to Scotty Bowers -- who arranged "tricks" for dozens of closeted Hollywood stars.
It was a real-life Perry Mason moment in the public trial of Scotty Bowers' credibility.

In his sensational memoir, Full Service: My Adventures in Hollywood and the Secret Sex Lives of the Stars, Bowers claims he procured female lovers for Katharine Hepburn and had threesomes with Cary Grant and his longtime companion, Randolph Scott. He depicts Old Hollywood as teeming with closeted gay stars willing to pay for discreet sex because they were worried about morals clauses, studio snitches, Confidential magazine and those self-appointed Hollywood watchdogs, columnists Louella Parsons and Hedda Hopper.

But the press has largely covered Full Service as cocktail-party gossip. Even the New York Times simply repeated Bowers' claims, with the down-and-dirty details -- e.g., that Charles Laughton liked shit sandwiches, that the Duke and Duchess of Windsor were both gay, that Cole Porter would suck off as many as 15 young men at a time -- heavily sanitized.

Bob Benevides' conversation with the L.A. Weekly, then, was something new: fact-checking. Reached by phone, previously unaware that he was even mentioned in the book, he confirmed everything.

phpliQMWHPM.jpg
Yes, Benevides admitted, it was Bowers who first "introduced" him to actor Raymond Burr in 1959.

Yes, Bowers frequently "introduced" young gay guys to older men like Burr.

Yes, Bowers took no money for making the "introduction."

"Scotty just liked to make people happy," Benevides says.

In fact, Benevides confirmed three of the most controversial claims in Full Service: that Bowers, now 88, was the go-to procurer for many Hollywood stars -- gay and straight -- in the pre-sexual revolution, pre-AIDS, pre-Craigslist, postwar era; that he gladly shared his sex partners of both genders; and that he was not a "pimp" in the traditional sense because he collected money only when he personally serviced the customer.

Burr was not a star on the elite level of Spencer Tracy or Tyrone Power, both of whom Bowers writes about in graphic detail. But thanks to the enduring fame of Perry Mason, Burr was on the next level down. He also had prominent roles in several classic films: the relentless DA in 1951's A Place in the Sun and the wife murderer in Alfred Hitchcock's 1954 masterpiece Rear Window.

Bowers claims he turned tricks with Burr for years before setting him up with the much younger Benevides. "I arranged a quick trick for Ray," he writes. Benevides then became Burr's life partner for the next 33 years, until the actor died in 1993.

Keep reading to learn how photos revealed at a book reading suggest Bowers is telling the truth.


My Voice Nation Help
49 comments
cowboyjaybop
cowboyjaybop

I lived and worked in Hollywood during the 80`s when I was in my 20`s. I occasionally met older gay men who had worked at some of the studios and they would sometimes casually mention "funny stories" about famous "stars". I took this all with a grain of salt and believed pretty much everyword I heard. People like Scotty are out there and if you hang around Hollywood long enough stories like his are simply "no big deal".

krpegelow
krpegelow

Depending on who he discussed in this book he will be fortunate not to have discussed the wrong person.  The book may not be scandalous enough to get him sued, but there are still some who are mentioned in this book to make someone want to make him disappear.  Also, since he openly discusses what constitutes illegal activity (pimping and operating a prostitution ring) he could find his royalties confiscated by the government.  There are also issues, since he mentions the Royal house of Windsor, that there could be international complications as a result of his comments that could put him in hot water that go beyond issues of law suits.  I will agree with Dave Seaman in that what they did in private was nobody's business but their own.  We admire them for their professional achievements.  I am sorry that Scotty felt it his job to demean their memory.

Shellyb126
Shellyb126

I feel that there is no reason that Scotty would lie. I am a lover of old films and the old studio system was quite strict. Stars had to act appropriately or careers would be ruined. Marriages were often arranged to save gay stars from gossip.Scotty is 89 years old and maybe just wants to tell his very interesting story and get some recognition . He is given credit from many people who know him as being a very kind and caring person.He was sexually abused at a very early age and semms to equate sex with love.

Lakeview68
Lakeview68

Thiis guy is 88 years old. Why would he make stuff up? To further himself? LOL. Midwesterners are brutally honest.

Lakeview68
Lakeview68

If he got dates or times wrong, I'm sure it's because of his age. Many elderly people do this, so that doesn't mean anything. Hollywood is sleazy. It's the devil's playground. Everybody knows this.

Cagey
Cagey like.author.displayName 1 Like

I lived next to the house Scottty now shares with his wife.  At the time it was owned by one of Scotty's ex'-lovers.  Scotty was a  loya lfriend  to this man until the man's death.  He came by three to four times a week to check on him, to make sure he had food and his health was okay.  He catered and served as a bartender for this man's familiy get togethers. And he did  all of the handyman jobs that needed to be done. And he did this for free.  ( His kindness has been rewarded with the fact that he now lives in this current home free of charge and he inherited a large amount of money from this gentleman.    The owner of the house I rented used Scotty as a handyman. He he told me of many of the things he had witnessed over the years with Scotty.  Scotty liked sex.  He did try to get me into bed on more than one occasion.  And he had told me about two dozen of the stories that are in this book.  This was over 18 years ago.  I believed him, then and i belive him now.   Scotty is a kind, generous person.  I do think he just wanted to get the truth out there, if for no other reason that to show how things had been, and that the world did not end because of sex.

krpegelow
krpegelow

Unfortunately, pimping is still an aspect of prostitution and how well he treated others has no bearing on the fact that this action was and is a criminal offense.  There are laws on the books that prevent people from making a profit from criminal behavior.  Whether the statute of limitations has passed on the crimes or not, the basis of the book is based upon his behavior, not his kindness to others.  He stands to loose all royalties the book creates if someone chooses to prosecute under that statute and it this law is in effect in several states in one form or another.  If the book is offered for sale in any of those states, each state could go after him separately.

 

In the interest of "preserving history", he may have opened an unwelcome can of worms for himself and any heirs to his estate.

keith
keith

He used his penis to feed his family ?!? Jesus Jumping Jesus on a pogo stick ! What the Hell passed for "food"  in the old days? The people who drank the drinks that he prepared as a bartender must be getting sick to their stomachs after reading about what the creep was feeding his family.

Dave Seaman
Dave Seaman

Scotty was famous for keeping his silence asnd suddenly he chooses not to. I don't get it. Is it because he himself sees that in his late 70's this "historical" information will dissapear? Is it because being homosexual is no longer the career destroyer that it was  when Monty Cliff and Rock Hudson were working? Or what about Mike Brady? Neil PAtrick Harris could score with any of your wives or husbands yet he is treated so very differently than Ellen DeGenerous was in the mid 90's. For God's sake, It becaomes what the media makes of it and Scotty's book is part of that media. Sure. J. Edgar Hoover worse women's clothing. My business? Not at all. Katherine Hepburn slept with women,. None of my business. But she was damned good in "On Golden Pond" and "The philadelphia Story". Unless we, as the media consuming media, demands better then we're just feeding the fire. At what point will people simply thank people foer doing thri jobs? It costs ten bucks to see a motion picture in the theatre. It costs about the same to purchase the DVD; do people honestyly beliecve that these actors owe us more than their performance? The American way: Gimme my free lunch.

Adelma367
Adelma367

All right. Let's say that every word is true. There is still no way around the fact that the book is horribly written and, were it not for unhocking revelations of sex in Hollywood, it would never have been published.

KF916
KF916

Exactly.   This is just the National Enquirer in published book form with a slip cover.  It's horribly written, meanders, is disjointed. It gets by on its salacious content and not a whit more than that.

Dave Seaman
Dave Seaman

clap! CLAP! CLAP! CLAP! Sex in general and Hollywood during the time period that wasn;t real. The very definition of Nostalgia eliminates the bad and broadens the beautiful. Think of Weidman? Sondheim's musical "Follies."

Old Gay Guy
Old Gay Guy

I just finished the book and thought I would check out Scotty Bowers on the internet and came across this site.  I enjoyed the book although it wasn't particularly well written and Scotty repeated himself several times.  I actually enjoyed his recollections of growing up, his time in the service and his marriage to Betty more than I did his revelations about the people he tricked with.  I was also intrigued because Scotty is the same age as my dad who also in WWII.  Everything Scotty wrote about seems plausable to me - but I'm not going to run around quoting from it.

East Lakeview
East Lakeview

It doesn't strike me that anything he is saying is that shocking or unbelievable or hasn't been talked about in the past.

The only story I had not heard before was the Duke and Duchess of Windsor were gay/lesbian.  But I always heard that they had a strange relationship based on sex, so its not a big jump for me to think they were covering up for each other. 

Payton
Payton

 Actually, it's a huge jump since Bowers is the only person who has ever said this.  You know, Bowers, the guy who called the Duke of Windsor: Eddie.

East Lakeview
East Lakeview

I did a quick web search and there were rumors that the Duke was gay and a masochist and rumors that the Duchess was a hermaphrodite who had an affair with openly gay Woolworth heir, Jimmy Donahue. I have no clue if the rumors are true but don't find them unbelievable. Frankly, I really don't care one way or another; the royal family never interested me.

East Lakeview
East Lakeview

Payton,

You indicated that "Bowers is the only person who has ever said this"  And I responded that these rumors have existed for quite some time. I added that "I have no clue if the rumors are true"  so I don't understand why you would make the snide comment "if you found a rumor on the Internet it must be true."  Relax, its just a book.

Payton
Payton like.author.displayName 1 Like

 Well if you found a rumor on the Internet then it must be true.  After all, the Internet is the source of all truth.

Venson
Venson

I'm not much one for lending an ear to muckraking but this book does show an interesting perspective of so-called "Hollywood."  I'd always been given to believe that there was no one else for Hepburn than Spencer Tracy and vice-versa.  They weren't gay to us; just adulterers but barely a word was said about it nor many rocks thrown.

In that surviving relations are not suing makes Mr. Bowers seem all the more a source we may trust.

I've heard talk of Cary Grant and Randolph Scott from older gay men for years but always took it with a grain of salt.  The book, if the text's true,  proves what I was told.  I read a Cesar Romero interview long before stating an encounter with Desi Arnaz.  I'd always thought Romero was heterosexual.

Such stories may come as a surprise but are good for moving us out of the cobwebs of myth on toward reality.  A movie star's sex life is really none of my or anyone else's business but any fact that counteracts Hollywood lies is kind of freeing.  For too long a time, we bought into Hollywood's off-screen invention of saints meant to lead us to believe what it wanted us to believe.  At last, a reminder!  There's no such thing as the Tooth Fairy.

Philip Mershon
Philip Mershon

 It's interesting to me how upset people get over the notion that famous people in the golden era enjoyed themselves and had a little sex.  And god forbid if it was with someone of their own gender!

Were you guys all, like, missionaries abroad when we had the sexual revolution over here?

Detgoochberg
Detgoochberg

It isn't what they were doing that bothers people, but that a person can write all this without any evidence just because the celebrity is dead. I think if it were true, he would have written this memoir 30 years ago. He says he didn't because he was a gentleman and didn't want to tell tales, but a real gentleman wouldn't tell the tales just because the person died. The person who waits until the people are dead to tell tales is probably a liar. Also, he said he never wrote anything down but just remembers it all. I can't remember details of conversations or even guys I dated a few years ago. But he remembers thousands of such encounters from 60 years ago?!?

Payton
Payton

 Bowers' book has nothing to do with the sexual revolution.  It's just about someone lying about dead celebrities to make money.

And, also, Walter Pidgeon really does not have a grandson.  There are numerous citations for that fact.

Dave Seaman
Dave Seaman

He was fantastic in "Funny Girl", yes?

Payton
Payton

 Neither dead people nor their estates/heirs can sue for libel.  Once you are dead anyone can write anything about you.  Why do you think all the people in Bowers' book are dead?

Ninety Something
Ninety Something

Sugar thinks Bowers is an old gas bag! Sure there were tons of old fruits in Hollywood, but the only real trick Bowers turns is convincing people ALL this stuff is real. Please I should write the real Old Hollywood history!

Guest
Guest like.author.displayName 1 Like

Of course the Benevides/Burr story is true.  Benevides is still alive and nothing untrue could be in the book about a LIVE person who could sue him.  Once someone is dead their rights cease, as do the rights of their family, to sue for any falsehood.  Get real.  You can say anything true in a book about a live person and not be subject to a lawsuit..  What you cannot do is lie.  Why do you think Bowers waited so long?

krpegelow
krpegelow

I am going to question your remark that once a person is dead the author cannot be sued.  You are not taking into consideration the fact that the person's estate might still be active.  One can be sued on behalf of the person's estate by the executor.  Even if an estate is closed, it can be re-opened by a petition to the courts and, once again, be pursued on behalf of the deceased's estate.  Death does not take away their rights.  It only takes a different avenue to pursue it.

Joan, Alive & believing!
Joan, Alive & believing!

     Once again Guest is missing the point that Scotty did not have an idea that Benevides was alive or dead.  Scotty wrote about Burr because he knew it was true and he was not worried that someone would check.  Kudos to "LA Weekly" for tracking down Benevides and confirming Scotty's story about Burr"s gay relationship with Benevides.

Payton
Payton

Oh, and by the way, the story about the nine year old Scotty being fondled by a friend's father doesn't fly either.  Scotty's family didn't live on a farm in 1930.  He states in the book that the fondling started in 1930 and lasted until 1932 when they left their farm.  However, according to the 1930 federal census (taken in May, 1930), the family was not living on a farm but was living in the town of Lockport, IL where Bower's father was a prison guard.  The timeline for the alleged fondling simply doesn't work unless the sexual assault happened when Bowers was age four to six (or younger.)

Joan, I have a life I enjoy
Joan, I have a life I enjoy

  Get a life!  This sounds like that pathetic blogger Larry Harnisch!  Who devotes his life to attacking real authors who write authentic non-fiction books!        

Mary Mallory
Mary Mallory

Larry is not pathetic, he's a real researcher, a real historian, and someone who supports real writers, as Eve Golden, James Curtis, and I know.  None of the three of us wanted anything to do with that "book," because we don't believe a word of it.

krpegelow
krpegelow

So you are saying that published history is never contrived?  Real researcher or not, most of published history frequently glosses over fact in the interest of a good story.

Guest
Guest

 I find it interesting that the publisher had to get people like a fake grandson there to claim the book is true.  Methinks they doth protest too much.  And no one there can verify the majority of the claims in that book.  Yeah, he was a pimp, yeah, he worked at a gas station, yeah, he was a bartender.  And these people swearing up and down he's honest - the guy already has claims that he lied in another book (which I don't believe, I think he wanted to up his story a little for this one) so don't give me honest.  He also can't call himself a friend of any of these people. Or discreet.

Guest
Guest

I'm not saying Scotty didn't exist or didn't do many of the things he said he did.  But if you read the book carefully, the dates for many events are blatantly incorrect.  I for one have trouble believing Kathariine Hepburn got a gas station jockey/pimp to fix her up with 150 girls.  I also have a problem with this supposed "threesome" he had with Duke and Duchess of Windsor. As others have pointed out, he refers to the Duke as "Eddy" which no one did. This also violates another "true story" of the Duke and Duchess which contradicts everything Scotty says. That's nice that he introduced Raymond Burr to his boyfriend. That doesn't make 70-plus-year-old stories absent of any exaggeration or make them any more reliable. And if Peter Ford wants to out his father, I guess that's up to him.

crocheting4you
crocheting4you

You've missed the point about the referral of the Duke as "Eddy."   He did so to the guys he sent over to the Duke so they would think he was a regular guy, not the former heir to the throne of England...a fact that would lend itself to all sorts of blackmail at the very least.

Richard Horgan
Richard Horgan

Not sure which is stranger: The events that took place at Book Soup, or the fact that a former BHUSD administrator describes the co-author as just making do with "his big penis and charming personality."

Payton
Payton

According to IMDB, Pidgeon has no grandson.  He has two granddaughters,  Pat and Pam.  I would assume the "Grandson" was a plant by Bowers or his publisher.  Anyone who takes his book all that seriously, has my sympathy.

Joan, a believer
Joan, a believer

The idea that any publisher would go to all the expense and trouble to plant a fake grandson in the audience at Book Soup is straight out of a bad "twilight Zone" script!

krpegelow
krpegelow

I am going to go with the writer above who mentioned why the statement about Prince Edward and Wallace Simpson does not sound authentic.  Blackmail would most certainly been an issue with members of the Royal family and what is stated here would definitely have put them at risk.  The same goes with most of the famous people named in the book.  The best thing people could do is put this book back on the shelf where it belongs and refuse to buy it.  The publisher won't waste money on a book that does not make money for them.

Steve
Steve

I was at Book Soup when Scotty Bowers spoke. The man who identified himself as Pidgeon's grandson came across as a bit of a nut. He actually contradicted Bowers by saying that Pidgeon had never molested him as a child which in his twisted logic meant that he couldn't have imagined his supposed grandfather having gay sex (ie gay sex equated child molesting -- like I said, he came across like a bit of a nut). There were plenty of credible witnesses at both the Book Soup signing and another event at the West Hollywood Public Library a week later (including Glenn Ford's son) who spoke up on Bower's behalf.

Joan, no bias
Joan, no bias

I was at Book Soup and the "grandson" didn't come across as a "bit of a nut" !  In fact, he said that he was impressed with Scotty.

Payton
Payton

 Since Pidgeon has no grandson, however the man came across, he is still an imposter and probably a plant.

Payton
Payton

 Apparently the folks here at LA Weekly blog don't consider the credibility of people who make claims about what's in the book.  Why didn't they at least check to see whether Pidgeon even had a grandson much less that the person claiming to be that grandson had some kind of proof?

Philip Mershon
Philip Mershon

If you are basing all this on something you read on IMDB (a site fraught with inaccuracies) then it's you has my sympathy. 

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

Los Angeles Event Tickets
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city