MySpace Mom Back on Computer

• Thanks for the article this is just the thing I needed to see.

• I mean, come on... I know that the state will ban some people from carrying weapons for various crimes. By the standards that Drew is being allowed, these people should have every right to apply for a job where they would be allowed to handle & carry deadly weapons & then complain that they should be able to get special permission to handle said weapons. I don't care that Drew is unlikely to do such a thing again. All I care about is that now a very dangerous precedent has been set & in the future many other people, some who might do even more harm than Drew has, will be able to use this same argument for their cases & situations. This judge is a fool. If Drew wants to find a job then she can do what everyone else in a situation similar to her's is: find a job that doesn't entail using the banned items. If it has to be a lower paying or rougher job, well then tough cookies. You should've thought of that before you did what you did.

• I do have a problem with this. Drew committed a crime when she antagonized & bullied Meier. The punishment was that she was unable to use the internet. So why is Drew getting special treatment? What about all of the other criminals out there who have been banned from specific workplaces, living in certain areas, or going to specific places? Since Drew is apparently a special circumstance, shouldn't all of the other criminals out there be given special treatment as well? I don't think she'll ever do anything like the Meier stuff again, but that's not the point. The point is that Drew was given a punishment & evidently the courts don't think that she should have to stick to it. Drew could have very easily found a job that did not involve having to use the internet. Many office jobs do not require the use of a computer & some would have been willing to work around this. If she couldn't do the job without using the internet, tough cookies. You did something terrible & you have to live with the punishment. Considering that she helped fuel someone's destruction, she got off lightly. Maybe Megan would have killed herself because of something else, but that's not the case here either. Drew & her employee willfully bullied Megan into thinking that she would be better off dead. (In fact, they repeatedly told her that.) Whatever her previous mental status was, Drew & her employee's actions caused Megan's death. Shouldn't they both still be held accountable for it?

• Ms. Bennett's seems to be one that doesn't let a little thing like facts get in the way of her rant. Evidently, neither do you.

• Maybe the lads over at 4chan will get news of this. Lets hope.

TotalComments: 5