Rudy Martinez Vs Jose Huizar: Did Huizar, the L.A. City Council District 14 Incumbent, Sic a Building Inspector on Rival Rudy?

Categories: Election

By David Futch

building inspector.jpg
Rudy Martinez's worst nightmare
The feud that could see an outsider (Rudy Martinez) unseat a Los Angeles City Council incumbent for the first time in 24 years all got started over ... an over-sized patio?

That's what it looks like in the Martinez Vs. Jose Huizar race for Council District 14, judging from paperwork handed to L.A.Weekly by Martinez's camp. It shows that Martinez started getting a hard time for his restaurant upgrade plan from L.A. Building and Safety officials after he told Huizar he was running against him for City Council. Here's more:

First, to be clear, this is dirty tricks season. The two sides are surfacing all kinds of questionable and/or petty attacks on one another leading up to the Los Angeles March 8 election.

This could easily be a dirty trick, but it's still worth noting the facts.

In 2007, Eagle Rock businessman-turned-reality-TV-star Martinez applied to California Alcoholic Beverage Control for permission to assume the alcohol license for a Highland Park restaurant he'd purchased.

His application looked pretty strong, especially because his pal, Jose Huizar, the City Council member representing the 14th District, wrote a letter in support of the switch.

Five months later, with the switch stalled, Huizar's Deputy Chief of Staff Henry Casas wrote another letter to the ABC and attached a one-sentence letter on Building and Safety stationery, signed by inspector Henry Ojeda. Ojeda's letter said the city approved serving alcohol on Martinez' planned addition -- specifically "a 16' x 20' patio behind the bar/restaurant."

The friendship between Martinez and Huizar continued with emails back and forth about meeting for coffee.

That is, until early 2010 when, over a cup of joe, Martinez told Huizar he was going to run against him.

And what a coincidence!

A week later, an inspector from Building and Safety came to Martinez' restaurant and ordered Martinez to tear down the patio, which turned out to measure a larger 24-by-24 feet than approved.

A vendetta? Maybe.

"If you agree with Jose Huizar, you get what you want," alleges George Gonzalez, flack for Martinez' campaign. "If you're against Jose, you get fucked."

Ouch. But let's be clear: Martinez, one of the stars of "Flip This House," has been here before.

One episode of the house-flipping show depicts Martinez' crew building something without the right permit, then trying to make sure the inspector won't notice that their existing permit didn't cover the work.

On TV, the inspector never noticed that a brand spanking new set of concrete stairs led to the house's front door -- and no paperwork.

City building inspector Mark Van Slooten says city policy prevents him from saying who issued the complaint against the upgrade of the restaurant patio (uh, Mr. Van Slooten, we doubt that this kind of secrecy from Building and Safety will actually hold up in court, so we'll do a California Public Records Act for the info).

But Van Slooten says nobody in Huizar's office or the mayor's office filed the complaint.

"That may be what Mr. Martinez thinks, but I never told him that," Van Slooten says.

Martinez says the inspector he talked with was almost apologetic. "When he showed up he said there was a complaint from the police department, and I asked him who at the police department made the complaint," Martinez says.

"He said he couldn't tell me, then he smiled. I'm either going to have to tear down the canopy or appeal."

Or maybe Rudy Martinez should wait to see who wins the election. He might intimately know a new City Council member who could help him out.

My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
go rudy!!!
go rudy!!!

Funny the name Mark Van Slooten comes up...he's currently the inspector doing what I think is a sub par job inspecting the building that I live in...

ladbs is the muscle
ladbs is the muscle

this brings up many questions about our city employees and what powers they are abusing.

Stewart18
Stewart18

Is there any such thing as a politician who is really for the people? This just sounds like a "quienes mas macho" contest.

TM
TM

Yes, Huizar is very child like when he does not get his way, at a celebration Huizar purposely bi-pass me when shaking hands with all the stakeholders sitting at the same table. It was good, because I was not going to discuss politic for respect to the host, Huizar gave me no choice is attempt to justity why he did not extend a shake of hands to me.

Tall Madge
Tall Madge

"tm4rudy" - By your very screen name (Theresa? I believe it is, from Boyle Heights, who rudely heckled Huizar at a Glassell Park forum until others all around couldn't even hear his answers - and who traveled to City Hall to ask for pity that the Councilmember doesn't seek your "expertise" in things related to your community). It's obvious you're feelings are hurt over a "negative" rating and you're not even close to being a neutral party or willing to consider just how concocted this "vendetta" Mr. Martinez is, including a timetable that just doesn't hold up, especially considering the violations involved and when he really announced his candidacy. (You've made your choice, and like most highly partisan posters, can even find a way to try and make it appear that Mr. Martinez was right in asking the City to look the other way at his violation - even using friendship with a sitting councilmember to skirt the law). That's something we all would condemn in anyone else. Mr. Martinez's track record shown on his own television show of trying to skirt City rules, without the required variance, is also reported here and I've seen it myself. Very damning, very unfair to other businesses, and certainly a lot more serious that someone "not shaking hands" with someone who's unruly, rude, and petty at public meetings. You've really ruled yourself out as a "judge" over anyone's qualifications -- and all because your feelings are hurt.

Tall Madge
Tall Madge

According to your story, Mr. Martinez's patio didn't meet code. If it was approved anyway, wouldn't that have meant he was being shown favoritism? Is his complaint as a candidate now that he wasn't shown preferential treatment by the man he once called a friend. As his opponent now, hasn't Mr. Martinez charged that the incumbent did treat his supporters better than others, and that that is wrong to do - and if allowed to replace Mr. Huizar, that he won't show others the kind of special treatment he's now complaining that he didn't get? Because that's wrong?

This is a very odd complaint, and seems to suggest that the challenger wanted his councilmember to behave unethically when it benefited him, but otherwise, it would be wrong.

tm4rudy
tm4rudy

It is nott odd, basically you are correct, if he gave Martinez approval for the variance, which other business may request too, the city will approve it. If Huizar now want to change his decision he better come up with a good excuse as to why. Mr Martinez has improved and upgrade the area. Is Mr Huizar renaging on all variance he has approved, or only for Martinez? That is the real question....

CD12watcher
CD12watcher

I am fully endorsing Brad Smith for D 12. I work in Chatsworth and its the same old politics as usual out here. We need as fresh face to this district and I putting up signs and registering people who come into my business to vote!!!! If we can get Englander into a run-off that will be a victory in and of it self!!!

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city