City of L.A. Smuggles $884 Million From Redevelopment Agency At Surprise Meeting, Ducking State Cuts And Public Scrutiny

Categories: City News

cralaimages.jpeg
Update: Do we really want $1 billion and the future of L.A. urban development to remain trapped in the incestual CRA-City Hall family?

Update: Turns out they actually transferred all CRA assets and projects, bringing the total city transfer to more like an abstract $1 billion, according to Kaye.

Ron Kaye, ex-editor of LA Daily News, spotted the sneak thundercloud yesterday: a mysterious "special meeting" posted to the Community Redevelopment Agency's website, at which CRA commissioners would decide the fate of $884 million. (Too bad we were busy pulling our hair out over that silly meeting on the Zoning Code.)

The note was only posted 24 hours before the meeting's start time -- a painful 8:30 a.m.

This morning, despite the best efforts of Kaye and erratic city activist John Walsh to thwart them, all six CRA commissioners OKed the $884 million "cooperation agreement" with the City of Los Angeles.

How did they get away with this?

Yesterday afternoon, in a panic, Kaye urged his loyal readers to barrage L.A. City Attorney Carmen Trutanich and CRA-involved officials with a cease-and-desist letter of sorts, "to call for the immediate halt of this fraudulent action of the CRA to try to evade the legitimate budgeting process of the State of California."

The meeting announcement contained only the following vagueties:

AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE A COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF LOS ANGELES FOR PAYMENT O APPROXIMATELY $885 MILLION FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CERTAIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CURRENTLY DESIGNATED 31 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS

However, by all appearances, the gigantic transfer is a blatant attempt to evade a July 2011 slash of all local redevelopment agencies like the CRA -- one of the many strict budget decisions made by Governor Jerry Brown in his first week at the helm of California. Brown's proposal would save the state $6 billion a year.

Even the Associated Press caught on:

The Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency has allocated $885 million for projects throughout the city before it is possibly dissolved under terms of the austerity budget Gov. Jerry Brown has proposed for California. ...

Commissioner Kenneth Fearn says there would be no assurance the money would go back to the city of Los Angeles if it falls into state hands.

Eliminating local redevelopment agencies is proposed in Brown's budget, which calls for $12.5 billion in cuts.

L.A. city officials also had the usual pack of political citywatchers to look out for. However, their efforts kinda backfired, in our opinion, considering they managed to violate the Brown Act's 72-hour-notice requirement on an item in which state officials have every reason to invest themselves. (Kaye notes that the reason for the Brown Act was actually invented right here in L.A., when City Councilmembers unanimously approved a certain "Number X" -- a boost in their own salaries -- without notice. So yeah, you see the precedent we're working with.)

In the sample letter form, Kaye states:

"The CRA has no legal authority to proceed with this special meeting. The CRA has failed to comply with the Brown Act. This decision, if it is approved today, will result in massive public outrage against the elected and appointed officials of the City and CRA, including a City Attorney that allowed this patently illegal meeting notice to be posted. Actions taken at this proposed meeting of the CRA will be subject to nullification in the Los Angeles County Superior Court."

No one is answering the phones at the Community Redevelopment Agency this morning. What we really want to know is: Where exactly will the $884 million go now? Same place as all those other "special" funds, we suppose.

Update: Kaye just posted a video of the meeting. It appears CRA Board President Kenneth Fearn also motioned for an agreement with City Hall that would essentially preserve all the CRA jobs, including their pensions, by making the agency into a city-run nonprofit. So much for Brown's bright idea...

My Voice Nation Help
6 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Mv1957
Mv1957

you can tell they all crooks they dont look up chicago illi, bell ca at best i just wonder how long will taxpayers rate payers will take this we have got use to this trash politicians bending us no vaceline eater is sad to see los angeles rank sack in on eyes they dont care if you all see they belive we dont care and in side of me i belive they right we dont

Bob
Bob

This motion may be overturned. The Brown Act Violation complaint is on the administrative record from both emailed correspondence ot the CRA and City Attorney and comments made at the hearing. If the CRA does not apply a remedy, there is time to file a lawsuit.

Bob
Bob

"erratic city activist John Walsh" - John Walsh is about erratic as the original Columbo detective from the late 60s, early 70s. He is right on target. Los Angeles should thank Walsh for making it down there and calling it on the Brown Act Violations for the Record. Thank you Mr. Walsh for your service!

WalterMoore
WalterMoore

This is what we in the legal business call a "fraudulent conveyance." Will the City Attorney stick up for taxpayers? Or will he throw in with the bad guys? Moment of truth time....

Rick Abrams
Rick Abrams

The City Attorney is the attorney for the city and not for the public. When they are accused of fraud, it is his legal duty to defend them. The City Atty can advise his clients privately never to do what what they are doing, and the law forbids the City Attorney to ever tell anyone that he advised the City -- "Do not do that."

That is why Stephen Box (CD 4 candidate) has called for a City Prosecutor who has the power to prosecute all criminal cases including felony cases involving City Hall. That is the County System -- County Counsel to advise the County and District Attorney to bring criminal cases. The City of LA has no counterpart to the District Attorney. The City Atty's job is to protect City Hall -- including from criminal charges.

The City Attorney may not engage in fraud, but if a councilman takes a bribe in front of the city atty and tells the city atty, "what you are seeing is privileged under the Atty Client privilege," the city atty has to keep that secret.

If you want to stop corruption, vote for Stephen Box -- he wants a City Prosecutor.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city