Measure L: Due To Severe Budget Cuts, L.A. Librarians Struggle to Help Students and Families


lapubliclibrary.jpg
Richard J. Riordan Central Library in downtown L.A.
Update, 2:50 p.m.: The Library Foundation of Los Angeles gave a major boost to the Measure L campaign, contributing $200,000 to get the ballot measure passed. Read more after jump.

Last summer, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and the L.A. City Council took the extraordinary step of closing the city's entire public library system two days a week -- the only major city in the United States to do such a thing in recent years.

The result, according to Teri Markson, a children's librarian at L.A.'s Fairfax Branch, has not been pretty.

"What we've gone through the past year has been incredibly painful," says Markson, a 15-year Los Angeles Public Library veteran, "because we can't do what we've previously been able to do."

Due to drastically reduced library hours and staff, which were caused by severe, City Hall-approved budget cuts, Markson says her outreach work to local schools has been diminished, it's very difficult to arrange student field trips to the Fairfax Branch, and the library is now closed on Mondays -- a crucial day that starts off a student's academic week.

"The library is where (kids) type up their homework," says Markson, noting that many students from low- to middle-income families don't own a computer and printer and go to a library to use those things.

It's a shocking situation, in which politicians have quickly turned one of the largest and most respected library systems in the country into an institution that's now less kid-friendly, less student-friendly, and less family-friendly.

L.A. Weekly, in fact, uncovered these embarrassing truths in the widely-read feature story "City of Airheads," which outraged many L.A. residents.

But Measure L, an initiative authored by L.A. City Councilman Bernard Parks, seeks to help those kids and families by better funding L.A.'s public libraries.

The ballot measure will not increase taxes, but dedicates a slightly larger slice of existing money in the city's general fund to the library system.

Measure L has been endorsed by Valley Industry and Commerce Association, AFL-CIO's Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, the Los Angeles NAACP, the PEN Center USA,
former Mayor of Los Angeles Richard Riordan, and many other politicians, labor unions, and civic groups.

The Los Angeles Times and Los Angeles Daily News oppose the measure, throwing out an argument that essentially says the increased monies for libraries could take away funding from the police and fire departments.

The L.A. Times and Daily News don't consider the fact that Villaraigosa and the City Council have plenty of opportunities to avoid such a situation by cutting still-existing fat from the city's budget.

If voters don't approve Measure L on March 8, things may only get worse at Los Angeles's once highly-regarded library system.

"There's a real concern about what cuts may come if the measure doesn't pass," says Markson.

Update: Library Foundation Chairman Jeff Brown says about a recent $200,000 contribution to the Measure L campaign: "We have to save our neighborhood libraries. If we are going to succeed, I need every individual and organization that cares about our civic life to join us by sending a donation and getting involved."

He adds, "If Measure L does not pass, an already injured library system will be further decimated and Angelenos will see more closures and reduced hours."

Contact Patrick Range McDonald at pmcdonald@laweekly.com.

My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
Richard Kraus
Richard Kraus

Rap with the L Raisers: Angelenos time to ring the bellAbout voting yes on Measure L Library friends let's keep the faithVote Yes on L come March the 8th Want libraries open more, not lessThen go to vote on March 8th, L Yes L.A. needs those who like to readGet Measure L passed, yes indeed Keep libraries open for all the kidsBefore budget cuts makes libraries hit the skids Measure L is for Libraries, L Yes, L Yes Keep libraries open for learning to readIn the city of L.A. that's a real need Measure L is for Libraries, L Yes, L Yes Keep libraries open for those in the mobOut searching and hoping to get a job Measure L is for Libraries, L Yes, L Yes Keep libraries open for free accessAnd not even call for more in taxes Measure L is for Libraries, L Yes, L Yes Libraries offer much for both rich and poorPass Measure L so we can open the door Measure L is for Libraries, L Yes, L Yes Keep libraries open for our community prideSo we we'll never see the day the city died Measure L is for Libraries, L Yes, L Yes Library friends let's keep the faithVote Yes on L come March the 8th Richard Kraus

Peter Thomas Senese
Peter Thomas Senese

In many ways, a society may be best measured by how instrumental its library system is. Unquestionably, a library is not simply about books and reading but about an assortment of programs and safe havens that it provides all of patrons, young and old alike. To not provide the necessary resources that all libraries need, is in my opinion an act of betrayal to all citizens, but particularly to our children - who need to embrace their imaginations and see the wonderments of knowledge best exemplified by these great institutions.

Our libraries forster hope for each of futures. We need Measure L to pass.

Peter Thomas SeneseAuthor

Gabbie
Gabbie

Please explain to me. I love the library . My kids love it. It angered my family that we would show up on a day that it was now closed due to cutbacks. It comes back to us, the people, to help save the libraries?! Why don't some of these political/government/city councilmen making 100K+ salaries come down off THEIR high horses and donate some of their own cash! This is ridiculous along with all their other reasons for cutting back on education related issues.

Maddybk
Maddybk

I would also like to take this opportunity to point out that this increase, while important, is small. Over four years, Measure L will increase that percent of property tax that the library department already receives from .0175% to .03%. This means that in four years, the library will be able to restore 6 and 7 day service and the drastically cut materials budget. Of the 8 largest cities in our country, Los Angeles spends the least per person. We put up a tough fight with City Council, both librarians and the public, last year to no avail and suffered the biggest cuts of any city department. I work in a city library in South Los Angeles and every day, we are packed with adults, children and teens. That being said, I've also worked in two other libraries in the past year located in the Mid City West and Hollywood regions and can vouche that they are just as busy. There are lines at both the reference and circulation desks, especially on Tuesdays after we've been closed for two days. And I'm talking about lines of twenty and thirty people, not two or three. In a city that is experiencing over 11% unemployment, what the library offers is a safe haven for discovery, learning, exploration and even just hanging out and book browsing. We have free materials to help with homework, SAT classes, ACT classes, free art classes, computer classes and resume workshops. The library provides the information specialists that people need in an age of information overload. Library services are essential to the cultural and social health of any city, but for those who are suffering greatly in tough times, the services that libraries provide are an essential lifeline. A Vote for Yes on Measure L is a vote to preserve a service that is essential to viable city.

Skrashen
Skrashen

Some facts about libraries:

In the 2010 America's Most Literate Cities report, Los Angeles placed 70th out of 75 cities in public library quality.

California has the worst-supported school libraries in the country, in terms of both holdings and staffing. Los Angeles City Schools does not even fund school librarians in elementary schools.

Study after study shows that library quality and library staffing (presence of a credential librarian) is related to higher scores on reading tests. It is therefore not surprising that California children do poorly on reading tests: Children get better in reading by reading a lot, and they read more when they have access to books.

Our research strongly suggests that access to books in libraries can offset the impact of poverty on literacy development. Write me for a copy: skrashen@yahoo.com.

We cheerfully spent huge sums on tests, which have no research support, but we cut funding for libraries, while the relationship between reading achievement and library quality is solidly established.

Stephen KrashenProfessor EmeritusUSC

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city