Tomas O'Grady, District 4 City Council Challenger Calls Shuttering Libraries "Biggest Scam"


VTtriangle.jpg
L.A. Curbed
On Tom LaBonge's watch: the $875 thou median known as Vermont Triangle Park
Tomas O'Grady, the L.A. Times endorsed City Council District 4 challenger, told LA Weekly that Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and City Council's decision to shutter L.A. Libraries two days a week "was the biggest scam."

We couldn't agree more. If passed in the Municipal Elections March 8, Measure L will re-open libraries seven days a week at no extra cost to taxpayers by guaranteeing the Library Department a higher percentage of property tax revenue -- an issue that the Times out of character endorsement of a non-incumbent (O'Grady) to City Hall focuses on.

The L.A. Times endorsmement points out the obvious: City Council District 4 incumbent Tom LaBonge endorses Measure L, yet was among those who voted to take money from the libraries in the first place.

Typical is LaBonge's handling of city libraries: Like other council members, he accepted Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's tough but necessary cut in their funding; now he supports a ballot measure to protect them from people like himself.

O'Grady told LA Weekly today: "I think it's pathetic that we have to have it [Measure L] on the ballot in the first place. I'm supporting L and when elected, l'll be finding the waste so as to pay for L."

In response to a letter that O'Grady wrote, calling B.S. on shuttering libraries, LaBonge answered in this way, through an aide, after voting to support the Sunday and Monday darkened libraries.

Councilmember LaBonge asked me to reply on his behalf. Tom is as unhappy as you are that many Los Angeles libraries are now closed two days a week. That is why he worked with Council member [Bernard] Parks to place a measure on the March ballot that asks voters to increase the portion of the city's general fund allocated each year for libraries.

Another budget allocation issue O'Grady takes with LaBonge is what any astute observer might describe as a glorified street median. Officially it is known as Vermont Triangle Park and is located where Vermont Ave., Prospect Ave. and Hollywood Blvd. meet. It was re-landscaped under LaBonge's watch, for not the thriftiest of prices.

"There is a park that Tom LaBonge is blowin' about, spent $875,000," O'Grady
says. "I cost it out and could not find more than 40 grand. It's a joke, they never
should have spent it. I could have gone in there with a truck, a couple of shovels, a
couple of native plants and a bench and we'd be done. It's just his attitude, if the city
is awash with money, they are going to keep wasting money."

A spokesman for LaBonge wasn't eager to take credit. He tells L.A. Weekly, "I believe your 875-thousand dollar figure is accurate for the Vermont Triangle, but that is a
CRA [Community Redevelopment Agency] LA project, not a Council District 4 project, so you'll need to get exact figures from them. Thanks for your interest."

LaBonge himself, along with City Council President Eric Garcetti, were all smiles at the ribbon cutting ceremony for the "park," a project that could have easily been shot down by LaBonge if he had wanted to do so.

O'Grady credits his L.A. Times endorsement to his "no-nonsense approach to fiscal matters."

Getting back to the Library issue: O'Grady is in plenty of company supporting measure L.

A press conference that was held this morning outside the closed Angeles Mesa Branch
Library was attended by students, City Librarian Martín Gómez, librarians and Bernard
Parks, the City Council District 8 incumbent who authored Measure L.

"Libraries democratize access to information, allowing all residents, no matter what their age, where they live, or how much money they make an equal opportunity to learn and enrich their education, " Parks said at the event. "Our libraries today are much more than a place to check out books, they run after school programs, provide meeting space for community groups and allow thousands access to the global resources of the internet."

Contact Mars Melnicoff at mmelnicoff@laweekly.com / follow @marsmelnicoff


My Voice Nation Help
18 comments
Armenian
Armenian

All the while painting himself as a model off fiscal responsibility,

Mr. Box failed to disclose the multiple judgments recorded against him that belie this characterization

: SIX liens in the past ten years, including at least two state and one federal tax lien.

This is the man to lead our city out of it's fiscal crisis???

Box also promises a "rose garden" of sorts on private property of Hollywood and Garfield as an Armenian Genocide Memorial Park is like planting weeds and false promises! We are not stupid

Mr. Box claims the lot was empty for five years. A week before election he comes up with way to entice armenian vote and like

Matthew
Matthew

Tomsm O'Grady is a lying fraud who has abused children at Franklin Elementary when he was in position of authority. He abuses and uses children inappropriately for his own ends.

barristeralumni
barristeralumni

I feel like I can't believe O'Grady anymore regarding his stance on measure L. I have heard him flip flop from one forum to another and the lack of conviction of standing by his beliefs frightens me.

Guest
Guest

This is patently untrue. Do you have any links to support this statement? If one cares to go to Mr. O'Grady's website they will find a letter from last fall where O'grady found the 4million to keep the libraries open. So I urge anyone to take a look for themselves and not believe barristeralumni's childish and downright false claims of "flip-flopping".

Molamola
Molamola

"Stop insulting the guy for being sincere. I am voting for him for just that reason."Absolutely!!Go Tomas!!

Bookteeth
Bookteeth

I genuinely believe what O'Grady has achieved with little financial backing is exactly what CD4 needs. His achievements are there to see - He will halve his salary immediately if elected. Why?. because the average salary in CD4 is approx $50,000. Council members themselves earn $178,789 per annum.Furthermore, Tomas O'Grady is not afraid to speak out - This is the guy we need to force back some integrity\honesty into the system.

Megan
Megan

I will be upfront about the fact that I am an assistant on the O'Grady campaign. Tomas is glad to put to rest all these comments with regard to the fact that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He has made very clear that he can be reached every day at 323-644-1629 if anybody would actually like to speak with him and see what he does or doesn't know. Please call our office and Tomas will explain in detail how wasted pennies in city hall have added up to shuttered libraries. Tomas brought spreadsheets to his interview at the LAT showing how saving money, whether that be on his own salary and staff or on other waste, adds up to real solutions to our budget problems. This is one of the things that led to the endorsement. Again, Tomas’s number is 323-644-1629. Why not get the answers directly from the candidate?

Voter
Voter

Measure L rearranges fungible cash between departments from a set amount of property tax. It also changes the City Charter to allow the City to then legally heist that increased amount for indirect costs and utilities to place into the General Fund- something the charter currently makes illegal to do.

Not only will it eventually cost taxpayers - likely in lost services from other departments who lose part of their annual percentage allocation to the Library - but it removes one of the few protections the taxpayers had granted the Libraries from theft of their funding for the General Fund.

After reading this article, can you even pretend O'Grady knows what he's talking about?

You know darned well that LaBonge knows what he is perpetrating as the author of this thinly-veiled measure.

Measure L is a huge mistake, and most voters won't have a clue that they're making that mistake. Neither does O'Grady, based on his silly grandstanding commentary.

Voter
Voter

Let me restate my first paragraph for clarity:

Measure L rearranges fungible cash between departments from a set amount of annual property tax. It gives a higher percentage of that set amount to the Libraries, and because the total pot of money is fixed, other departments must therefore lose by the same amount. It also changes the City Charter to allow the City to then legally heist from Libraries that increased amount for indirect costs and utilities to place into the General Fund- something the charter currently makes it illegal to do.

birgit frisch
birgit frisch

if the charter makes it illegal, why has the city been doing it for the past year? seriously, I want to know, because it does seem like this is a sneaky way for the city not to have to pay for utilities and pensions for the lib.and pks dept. out of the general fund, which it does for every single other city dept.

punished4caring
punished4caring

"[i]Stephen Box is the only CD #4 candidate who knows the solutions now[/i]."

now at least we know who is writing all this crap. thanks, "swartzwartz," for clearing that up for us. unfortunately, it would appear that adding more bike lanes will not solve every problem this city faces. equally unfortunately, i tried and failed to find anything else that your candidate actually stands for.

now we know what box's reputation as a "social media guru" actually means. that he and his campaign are not above taking cheap shots "anonymously" on the interwebs. hint: you shouldn't say the same thing in every post you make. it sort of gives the whole thing away.

is this what the guy above meant by astroturffing? i havent heard of that before.

Swartzwartz
Swartzwartz

This is all hype for O'Grady, but the facts do not back him up. O'Grady still does not show any understanding of Prop L. In reality, all Prop L means is that parks and libraries will each suffer the same degrees of cuts next year. O'Grady's complaint about the expensive park shows he does not know the difference between the CRA and the rest of the City. The article's author had to fill in the fact that as a councilmember LaBonge has oversight responsibility for approval or rejection of CRA projects.

Stephen Box is the only CD #4 candidate who knows the solutions now -- Mr. O'Grady is waiting until he is elected to took into the budget. That is a little late. O'Grady has missed every budget meeting, while Stephen Box attended every budget meeting. Box knows which department duplicates the functions of any other department; he knows which jobs should be switched from one department to another. He knows how to save the City about $500 Million next year, while O'Grady says he will look into the budget if he is elected.

O'Grady has no approach to fiscal matters except simplistic, feel-good sound bites. He will cut his salary in 1/2 and cut his staff in half. O'Grady is a nice guy but those two ideas are foolish. The city has lost $1.5 Billion in property tax dollars while LaBonge has been in office, so cutting one councilmember's salary is like removing one grain of sand from sandbox. LA is at one of its lowest moments in history and we need all the help we can get resurrecting ourselves -- this is NOT the time to cut the staff who can bring us back to life.

Hospitals who try to save $ but cutting staff by 50% end up with a lot of dead patients. If O'Grady had any understanding of the magnitude of the problems facing LA, he'd want to hire as many Competent and Honest people as possible. The problem with the nice people on LaBonge's staff is that they waste their time doing things for Tommy and not for the City.

Box and his brain filled with minutiae, like how to save us $500 Million, will have a staff which will revive LA and not cater to his persona.

actually_votes
actually_votes

" If O'Grady had any understanding of the magnitude of the problems facing LA, he'd want to hire as many Competent and Honest people as possible."

wow! HIRE MORE STAFF, that is bright, very bright indeed. Obviously we have a smart fiscal guy on our hands. Kidding. NOT.

The B candidates ( Box and LaBonge) are losing and all they can do is plant swartzwartz here. I have never met O'Grady, but I got a postcard from him that says ACTUAL THINGS that he will do.

Stop insulting the guy for being sincere. I am voting for him for just that reason.

InCD4
InCD4

Wow - this shows how much Tomas O'Grady does not understand about how the City works since he clearly does not understand in even the simplest way what Prop O and it's funding is about.

So yay for him not wanting libraries closed. Until he learns even the most rudimentary workings of the City and City Charter, he's not electable.

c_douglas
c_douglas

Wow- this shows how this guy didn't even take the time to read the article and what it was about. And prop O? What's wrong with taxing oil drilled in CA? Rudimentary workings? LaBonge has been in that building since 1976, what has he learned and what significant stances has he taken?

c_douglas
c_douglas

Perhaps you are not familiar with the different measures? This article is about prop L, not prop O...

O'Grady has researched measure L extensively (along with other measures and city proposals) which is obvious from this article and from his website.

Paganangelborrowedcar
Paganangelborrowedcar

ignore the astroturfer; someone is following O'Grady's news around now that he's doing well.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city