Top

blog

Stories

 

Crooked L.A. Judges Try to Slide Marina Del Rey Project By: Residents Await Courts To Stop Developers From "Sprucing"

Categories: Above the Law


Thumbnail image for Videoblog_95_sm.png
L.A. County Judges don't like illegal bonuses pointed out
As reported yesterday through very rose colored glasses by the L.A. Times, Marina Del Rey is in a process of "renewal." "Leaseholder Jerry Epstein will raze his 202-unit Del Rey Shores apartment community on Via Marina and replace it with a 544-unit complex in fewer, taller buildings, that will be called simply Shores."

The Times forgot to mention this detail: The residents of Marina Del Rey vehemently oppose this method of "sprucing up." And they fought it in court - only to have the attorney representing them taken down by a judge being bribed by the County - the County is partner with the marina developer.

Now L.A. judges (who have all accepted illegal bonuses from the County) are throwing around the follow up case like a hot potato:

State Superior Court Judges in L.A. County have been accepting massive illegal bonuses from the county since the 80s. The law states that judges cannot accept money other than from their employer - which in this case, is the state.

The people of Marina Del Rey sought former U.S. Prosecutor Richard Fine to represent them against the developer behind "sprucing up" their neighborhood in a way very unwelcomed by the community:

Fine pointed out that the judge overseeing the case, Judge David Yaffe, had accepted $850,000 in illegal bonus money from L.A. County. And the county is a partner of Del Rey Shores.

Fine found himself behind bars, in solitary coercive confinement, for 18 months. Yaffe's method to get him there? He slapped a $46,000 fine on Fine for filing a notice to the court one day late. Although the fine is legal, it actually isn't:

Fine had miscalculated the days, due to a holiday: Forgiveness for unintended error is the law. But the court used this as an opportunity to smear Fine - posing him as a debtor.

Fine refused to pay the sum, refused to disclose his personal assets and was told he was in contempt of court.

Fine had been disbarred during this process -- while the developer's attorney was serving as president of the State Bar Association.

Full Disclosure got wind of the incident and was able to interview Fine at the courthouse, before he went to jail. This gave much needed exposure to what was going on.

The very judge that had been responsible for locking Fine up, Judge Yaffe, ultimately was the one who released Fine.

Back in 2008 during Fine's contempt trial, Judge Yaffe testified in court -- in a very unusual situation: while he was sitting on the bench and testifying as a witness at the same time. He testified that he accepted payments from L.A. County, is not under contract with L.A. County and is not employed by L.A. County in any way.

In his release order to free Fine, he made a rather astonishing admittance:

"By keeping him [Fine] incarcerated for 18 months, the court has deterred others from defying its orders ..."

Yaffe then resigned from office before his term was over.

"I did disqualify him," Fine says of Yaffe. "And he didn't get off the bench. He stayed on even though he was disqualified, so he broke the law. That means everything he did in that case was void and null."

Which means there should legally be no "sprucing up" by Del Rey Shores quite yet in Marina Del Rey.

March 10, Dr. Fine headed back to court to continue his struggle to nullify and void all of Judge Yaffey's rulings. Other L.A. County Judges are afraid to touch it, as they are all guilty of the same bribe taking. The case is being handed off like a hot potato - five judges have refused to give him a hearing.

They are all afraid to meet the fate that Yaffe did.

Contact Mars Melnicoff at mmelnicoff@laweekly.com / follow @marsmelnicoff


My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
ao
ao

99% of L.A. County Judges ignore the average person/underdog's rights, and ignore the facts and the law, to rule for the party that they believe has more political power - in other words 99% of L.A. County judges are crooked.   This happens, in small claims court, superior court, Court of Appeals, etc.  For example most judges will just automatically rule for landlords, or for attorneys in disputes with former clients, because they identify with them, and believe those people can protect their cushy jobs and $200,000+ a year salaries with unbelievable perks.  I have witnessed this over and over again, and often they speak leagalese to the average person, knowing they don't have the legal knowledge or experience to oppose the Judge's crazy and untrue statements.  One place this is particularly rampant, is Commissioner Robert Harrison's courtroom (governs mainly over small claims cases) in downtown at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse - he sits smiling like a peaceful joker on his throne while quickly moving through cases, and simply refusing to rule against attorneys, the city, landlords, or the MTA, no matter what the facts or the law.  If we cannot receive justice in our courts, we cannot expect it anywhere.  We must demand that judges follow the law and the facts, and/or also demand that judges not simply ignore the non-attorney represented party's rights.  Attorneys will tell you that you can legally justify anything if you are creative enough.  That is many judges know how to use the law and words to phrase things so that they give the appearance of following the law, even though everyone can see that they are in fact ignoring the law. Also many judges realize that most people don't have the time, money or knowledge to appeal their crazy/erroneous verdicts, and hence their word is final, and no one will ever see the judges egregious/illegal acts (although appealing is often pointless as well when you are the underdog). 

Joseph Zernik
Joseph Zernik

To the Editors:

Crooked LA Judges? Your title is a gross understatement!

The case of Richard Fine documented a crooked justice system all the way from the Los Angeles Sheriff to the Supreme Court of the United States:1) The Sheriff arrested Richard Fine with no warrant and no valid conviction or sentencing, and held him in solitary confinement for 18 months under fraudulent records, stating that Richard Fine was arrested on location and by authority of the non-existent "Municipal Court of San Pedro".2) The US District Court, Central District of California conducted an invalid litigation of the habeas corpus petition, where the judgment was never certified by the Clerk of the Court, and a fraudulent docket was published online.3) The California Judicial Council retained Attorney Kevin McCormick to fraudulently appear, under false case caption, on behalf of Judge David Yaffe, while not authorized as Attorney of Record. Attorney McCormick then filed false records and a fraudulent declaration to affect the continued false imprisonment of Richard Fine.4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit published fraudulent dockets for the Petition and the Appeal, where none of the court orders were signed by a judge and none was served with attestation by a Clerk.5) The Supreme Court of the United States conducted pretense review of the Application and Petition, where no valid record were ever discovered.

For detailed review of the case of Richard Fine and the various levels of fraudulent legal records in the various justice system agencies involved in the case, please see links below.

Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)

LINKS:[1] April 20, 2010 Motion to Intervene and related papers in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court http://www.scribd.com/doc/3030...http://www.scribd.com/doc/3016...http://www.scribd.com/doc/3016...http://www.scribd.com/doc/3016...http://www.scribd.com/doc/3016...http://www.scribd.com/doc/3016...http://www.scribd.com/doc/3018...

Testeddad
Testeddad

Good article, seems like more residents need to get out and voice their concerns. Way to go Richard Fine and Leslie Dutton !!

Daniel H. Gottlieb
Daniel H. Gottlieb

It's worse than that, David. Epstein got a $125 million Non -Recourse Construction Loan, insured by HUD, that is by Federal taxpayers. HUD's mission is to help moderate and low income people buy homes. I looked up a Non - Recourse loan, and it is a loan in which Epstein is not obligated to pay back. He can just surrender the collateral, which usually is the property. But the County owns the property. I wonder what kind of financial engineering is involved with this loan? I wonder how many foreclosures of moderate housing would be forestalled in LA County by insuring $125 million of Non - Recourse Loans made to honest moderate income homeowners struggling to pay off their mortgages. I wonder which stimulates the economy better. A short temporary infusion of jobs for three years, or the continued health of otherwise abandoned neighborhoods decimated by foreclosures? So just as the farm subsidies program designed to save small family farms is now spending most of its money on subsidizing large mega farms, it looks like HUD is being diverted from helping moderate income home ownership to subsidizing high end apartment development. We should start our Federal spending cuts by eliminating first these Federal programs which have been subverted by wealthy well connected operators for their own profit.

Daniel Gottlieb

Bob-oso
Bob-oso

Excellent points Mr. Gottlieb, and thanks to LA Weekly blogs for getting this out there, MSM lacks any integrity when it comes to matters like this. Main stream media is the cause of it's own demise, and good riddance.What the MSM neglects to discus is the epic corruption in our just-us system. Go to "inproperinla" on blogspot for an eye opening catalog of the crimes committed by our judges and other elected officials, and the total commitment of law enforcement not to investigate these many major crimes. What we have here is judicial terrorism, our courts have been infiltrated by a criminal cartel way worse than the Taliban.

Savannah S. Winslow
Savannah S. Winslow

At last! THANK YOU for telling citizens the truth. There's even more to the story, though: this corruption goes all the way to the top, and includes former Chief Justice Ronald M. George and former Attorney General (now Governor) Jerry Brown (who refused to investigate, much less prosecute). L.A. County pays the illegal bonuses to judges so that L.A. County never loses in court when it is sued, and their Litigation Cost Management Reports prove it to be so. The County Supervisors have also received thousands of dollars in illegal campaign contributions in exchange for their (illegal) votes to approve the Epstein development project.

For more information, interested taxpayers tired of being ripped off (over $300 million given to judges to date) and conned (over TEN MILLION FELONIES retroactively forgiven by CA Senate Bill SBX2-11) are encouraged to review https://sites.google.com/site/... and http://righttrumpsmight.blogsp... , though the L.A. Weekly writer did a fabulous job reporting on those aspects he covered.

David Barish
David Barish

The LA Times also failed to mention that LA County TAXPAYERS are footing the bill for the affordable housing included in this project. Yes, the developer, Epstein, will receive an $11 million rent credit to cover the cost of constructing the affordable units. Why isn't the developer paying for it?

David Barish
David Barish

Let's not forget that the developer, Epstein, had his attorney petition Judge Yaffe to keep Fine in jail longer than the 18 months he had already served, saying otherwise, they will not collect their $46,000. Fortunately, Judge Yaffe came to his senses and let Fine go.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

Home

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city