Top

blog

Stories

 

Osama Bin Laden Photos Might Be Released After All -- If U.S. News Media Has Its Way

Categories: Media

Thumbnail image for osama sitting.JPG
This guy. But the dead version.
You might get to see those grisly photos of Osama Bin Laden's dead mug after all.

Associated Press has filed a Freedom of Information Act request to see photographs and video taken by U.S. personnel during the May Day raid on Bin Laden's Pakistani compound.

The act allows citizens to obtain public documents. However, the military and the Obama administration could argue they are "intelligence" and covered by protection of state secrets. We'll see. In any case, AP says ...

... even if it gets its hands on the photos, it doesn't mean they'll share them with you.

The photos, of course, would appear to include ones of Bin Laden's corpse after he was shot by at least one U.S. Navy Seal.

AP director of media relations Paul Colford told News Photographer magazine this:

... We would decide about publishing all or some on the images based on our own editorial standards, which include such factors as tastefulness and whether they could cause harm or danger to others.

Conservative groups Judicial Watch and Citizens United have also asked to see the pics, according to KPCC (89.3 FM).

The government has 20 days to respond to the requests. If it fails to so or denies them, the matter could end up in court.

Let's assume it will -- and that it'll be a long time before we find out if we can see Osama the corpse.

Is it our right? We think it is: It would be hard for the government to argue that this is a state secret that is of essential importance to security matters such as troop movement or intel, etc.

Now, while the images might enrage Muslim extremists, that shouldn't be the concern: The government cannot preemtively censor based on projections of or conjecture about what the reaction might be.

We don't necessarily want to see Osama's dead ass. But it could put some rumors to rest of journalists were allowed to take a gander. And, bottom line, photos of him are public documents -- by the people, for the people.

What do you think?

My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
Brandon Silverman
Brandon Silverman

Personally I want to see them, just out of curiosity, but I understand the reasons for withholding them. Release them in 20 years.

A little help
A little help

Dennis doesn't proof read! "But it could put some rumors to rest of journalists were allowed to take a gander." I think he meant "if" instead of "of." At least Dennis is for our freedom in this article. It is probably just window dressing, but wouldn't it be great if he actually covered issues such as censorship and our freedoms. Dennis, it seems you have a lot of liberties in writing your blog (and quite the soap box too), so please report on the actual news... even if your bosses or handlers don't like it. Dennis, you say "It would be hard for the government to argue that this is a state secret that is of essential importance to security matters such as troop movement or intel, etc." I agree. Please write an article regarding Wikileaks and Bradley Manning and the fact that no state secret that is of essential importance to security matters such as troop movement or intel, etc was released in that case either. Thank you

p.s. copy and paste your final article into MSFT Word. It will highlight your spelling and grammatical errors so that you can fix them before publishing. (preemtively ?)

Jheelly2
Jheelly2

Necessarily? Would a quick proofreading of your articles be difficult?

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city