Top

blog

Stories

 

McCourt Divorce Settlement Leaves Dodger Future Uncertain

Categories: Sports
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for mccourt illo.JPG
After a late night of negotiations, Frank and Jamie McCourt reached a settlement this morning in their bitter divorce feud.

The settlement, however, leaves a lot unsettled. Most of all, it does not even resolve the question of who owns the Dodgers. That will have to be determined at a one-day trial in August.

Have you ever heard of a settlement in which the parties agree to keep fighting? Well, that's Frank and Jamie for you.

Moreover, the settlement does not resolve the "second front" in the Dodger divorce litigation -- the intensifying battle with Major League Baseball. The deal is contingent on MLB's approval of a Fox television contract, which seems uncertain at best. If MLB withholds its approval, the deal is off.

Here's what the settlement achieves. It sets up an all-or-nothing one-day trial on Aug. 4, in which Jamie will argue that the Dodgers should be split 50/50. Frank will argue the team is his alone.

If Jamie wins, the Dodgers will be sold. (So if you're pro-sale, keep rooting for Jamie.) If Jamie loses, Frank gets the team. Jamie gets the houses, plus $100 million, which is not a bad way to lose.

The settlement also contains some terms that MLB will be likely to look askance at. It contemplates a $385 million loan from Fox, of which only about $200 million will go into the Dodgers. Another $50 million will be set aside to pay off Jamie. The rest will be used to pay down debt* and pay off attorneys' fees. One other stipulation: "Each party will receive an additional $5 million to use as she and he desires." Great!

Frank has previously said that he would put all the up-front money from the Fox transaction into the Dodgers -- and that it would not be used to pay off Jamie -- but that was apparently not intended to be a factual statement.

Now it's up to Major League Baseball to decide whether to approve the Fox deal. Outside court, Frank said he fully expects the deal to go through. If it doesn't, expect him to sue the league.

"This is a huge milestone," Frank said. "There's a very clear pathway to resolution on Aug. 4th.... It's dragged on far too long. I'm sorry. I feel horrible about it."

On that much, at least, Frank and Jamie seem to agree.

"The most important thing is to have resolution," Jamie said. "I love the Dodgers. I love the community. I love the fans."

Update, Monday: Indeed -- surprise, surprise -- MLB has a problem with the "diversion of Dodger assets for the personal use of Mr. McCourt." Deal is nixed. Settlement is void.

*Corrected. The original version referred to "personal debt," but the debt in question -- $80 million -- is owed by the Dodgers.

Here's the settlement.

My Voice Nation Help
1 comments
Abortmccourt
Abortmccourt

Ideally, Judge Gordon makes his decision on community property before Selig has to make a decision on the Fox deal. A ruling in favor if Jamie would make the Fox deal a moot point. A lawsuit by McCourt would paralyze the front office's ability to make personnel transactions, and the Dodgers could see players like Kemp and Kershaw sail off to greener pastures.

http://abortmccourt.blogspot.c...

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city