Los Angeles Bus Cuts: MTA Axes 305,000 More Hours of Service, Stranding Low-Income Workers in L.A. Outskirts

Categories: Transportation

757 bus cuts images.jpeg
Beverly Press
The 757, from Hollywood through Koreatown, will no longer run on weekends.
About every six months, we receive a deja-vu press release from the Bus Riders Union, furious at the Metropolitan Transit Authority for a new wave of massive cuts to the decrepit L.A. bus system.

The cuts, little by little, are stranding the city's lowest earners hours from their workplaces, with no mod metro station (which MTA officials always offer as consolation) in sight. The MTA rationale for this new round of cuts, which begins on Monday, is that, on average, only 42 percent of L.A. bus seats are filled. Here, we explain why that argument makes us want to crush some serious skull.

Also: Will you be out of a ride next Monday? List of changes, after the jump.

It's true that the subway system in L.A. is inching toward relevancy as politicians talk Obama into pitching in more federal funds. (It's not too difficult: Many other states can't handle the transit revolution right now, and the POTUS is a total rail romanticist.)

But until billions upon billions are poured into new subway lines -- partly to fight off the legions of angry homeowners/environmental activists who oppose them -- the $12,000-per-year working class is left out in the cold.

"We're living in a 4,000-square-mile county," says Bus Riders Union spokeswoman Sunyoung Yang. "And our job systems are not concentrated. ... Because of the costs and the years that it take to construct [new rail lines], what happens in the meantime? People can't physically get where they need to go."

Here are the lines that will be eliminated completely by Monday: The 902, the 26 (from Echo Park into downtown), the 442, the 445, the 335, the 247 and the 634. Over 20 more will be truncated and merged; get the complete list here.

Yang says she has calculated a total of 28 affected lines -- and more than half of those, she says, actually see above-average ridership. On a nationwide level, it's also worth noting that L.A. has the most crowded bus system after New York.

Rick Jager, MTA spokesman, notes that eight lines will also be augmented. But overall, the system is losing 305,000 hours of bustime, saving $20 million per year.

"People hate change," Jager says. "Anytime there's talk about modifying services, people are concerned about that -- because it changes their routine."

Former transit official Thomas Rubin debunks the notion that 42 percent ridership is a low figure, via LA Streetsblog:

Unlike an airline flight from LAX to JFK, Metro buses make many stops along their routes to pick up and drop off passengers. Bus scheduling is developed around the maximum carrying capacity of a bus at the peak load point of the route during the peak ridership period. This means that, for much of the day, and for most of even the busiest bus trips, there are a lot of empty seats. That's the nature of the transit business.

Art Leahy, CEO of the MTA, was given op-ed space in the LA Daily News today to defend the June cuts. He talks for a bit about all the lovely new subway stations -- "Witness the Kodak Theater, home of the Oscars, which sits atop a Metro Rail station, the lodestone of sports and entertainment ... at Staples Center downtown, and plans by NBC/Universal to relocate their headquarters above the ... Universal City station" -- and pats himself on the back for cracking down on bus promptness since he stepped into office almost three years ago.

(The Bus Riders Union, on the other hand, notes that over the last four years, L.A. city bus ridership has decreased 12 percent. Leahy would attribute that to subway and municipal bus-system growth, but the union calls BS.)

In his piece, Leahy breaks out all the classic MTA stops:

"Angelenos voted with their pocketbooks for a new more balanced transit system that would move people cheaper and often faster than they could slog through congested streets and freeways. They voted to retain a solid bus program and fare subsidies, but they also voted for a massive expansion of rail. We need both. ...

That doesn't mean the pendulum has swung back to rail. It means we must finally recognize the dynamics of transit here are changing. Rather than duplicating bus and rail routes and wasting scarce public resources, we must better integrate the various public transit services."

In East L.A., commuters would tell you a different story. The replacement of the 30 and 31 bus lines with the Gold Line subway has meant many more blocks of walk time, which doesn't work well for the elderly and disabled (or anyone with time constraints).

And an in-the-works $930 million Expo Line, which the MTA will use to justify the shrinking of eight South L.A. bus lines later this year, is going to leave many crannies of the city inaccessible via public transit. Subways are less flexible than buses -- with fewer stops and hardly any turns.

Bus riders protested the cuts this morning, then stopped by L.A. City Hall to beg councilmembers to do something about all this. But, as usual, that won't change the fact that the cuts go into affect on Monday. The union's biggest hope at this point is a federal civil-rights investigation into MTA budget decisions that begins in July, hinging on the fact that 92 percent of bus riders are minorities with an average income of $12,000.

"The vast majority of these cuts are going to affect the profoundly poor in this city and the working-class people," a protester told CBS2 today. "We will never see economic recovery in South L.A. or anywhere else without access to quick, efficient transportation."

The slightly higher-income black city of Hawthorne had a good showing at the MTA meeting last night. Community members were there to vouch for the 442 -- a bus that connects the small city in southeast southwest L.A. County to jobs downtown.

No luck. MTA decided the line will be completely eliminated once a single stop for the 115 is instituted at the Manchester Harbor Transitway Station. For many commuters, this will add hours to their go-between.

Happy Monday, right? At least them Westsiders got their bus lane.

[@simone_electra/swilson@laweekly.com]

My Voice Nation Help
7 comments
Alexander The Great
Alexander The Great

I agree with the commenters. LA Weekly certainly appears to be a bunch of racists (just like Bus Riders Union) and cannot even get their facts straight. As for the bus cuts themselves, I condemn those as well. I am deeply disappointed with the Metro CEO Art Leahy, as he does not seem to understand the priorities of mass transit, treating his patrons as boxes of lumber on a conveyer belt, no more no less. In certain areas I agree with Bus Riders Union (when it comes to service cuts), and I sympathize them, that they are now stranded due to draconian service cuts by Metro. Personally, I used to use mass transit when the bus service was much better (5-7 years ago), but now I completely switched back to driving, more walking, and riding my bike, because I can no longer rely on LA's slow buses, for which I have to wait for 30 (!) minutes. While the subway service is still decent (I use it occasionally), bus service has become completely unacceptable. Shame on Metro! Shame on Arthur Leahy! Metro is defintely going the WRONG way.

Rasputin244
Rasputin244

I also love the snide implication that "them Westsiders" got a bus lane. Classy. As if since the 720 goes to the Westside that means it's a line for rich white people, not that it's literally the busiest line in the system and like all buses in L.A. mostly ridden by minorities and low income folk.

Simone Wilson
Simone Wilson

I'm a Westsider, and did not mean to imply what you suggest.

Rasputin244
Rasputin244

Why would you selectively *mention the route of* Line 26 but not the other lines that you listed? Really strange L.A. Weekly journalism.

Rasputin244
Rasputin244

Why would you selectively Line 26 but not the other lines that you listed? Really strange L.A. Weekly journalism.

South Bay Resident
South Bay Resident

First a small nitpick:  Hawthorne is in south WEST Los Angeles County, south of Inglewood, North of Torrance, East of Manhattan Beach, West of Gardena.  It is also one of the most racially diverse cities in LA County.  Again, just pointing out little details...

I say this because I live in Hawthorne, and the bus service eventually got so bad I gave up and bought a car.  They way they restructured service in January of this year, there was no way I was going to make it to work on time, and still be able to drop my daughter off at daycare in the morning.  I bit the bullet and bought a small, inexpensive used vehicle that adds even more congestion to our already over-crowded freeways because it is clear that MTA does not care in the least about those who are transit dependent. 

Simone Wilson
Simone Wilson

Thanks, mistyped "southeast." And by "higher-income black" we meant the blacks in that area are slightly higher income. Really appreciate the close read. <3

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city