Top

blog

Stories

 

Photography is Not a Crime: ACLU Suing L.A. Sheriff's Department For Detaining Photogs Simply Because They Took Pictures

Categories: Above the Law

Thumbnail image for jonathan castillo sexy photographer.JPG
Jonathan Castillo
Stop or we'll shoot.
Updated at the bottom with juicy details about how this anti-photog movement in policing actually grew out of an LAPD policy. First posted at 1:29 a.m.

We got a lot of attention when we scolded Long Beach police Chief Jim McDonnell for declaring that detaining photographers for snapping pictures "with no apparent aesthetic value" is within department policy.

That kind of thinking, of course, is utterly unconstitutional bullshit. (Next thing you know they'll come after journalists for taking notes with no aesthetic value).

Maybe the ACLU has heard us, because the civil rights group is going after cops for ...

... "detaining and searching photographers" simply because they're taking pictures, according to an ACLU statement.

Unfortunately, the group didn't go after McDonnell's department. It's suing the already embattled L.A. County Sheriff's Department (inmate beatings, deputies shooting off-duty ... oh my) in U.S. District Court in L.A..

Interestingly, while it was a Long Beach Post photog (Sander Roscoe Wolff -- detained solely for taking shots of a refinery) who inspired our original post, it's another Long Beach Post reporter (Greggory Moore -- detained for shooting outside a courthouse), who appears to have inspired the ACLU to sue over deputies' actions.

The ACLU:

... Eight sheriffs deputies surrounded, frisked, and interrogated him, saying that because he was taking pictures across the street from the Long Beach courthouse, his behavior was suspicious.

The org says cops often detain photogs in the name of post-9/11 "suspicious reporting activity." In mentions these incidents:

LASD deputies detained and searched Shawn Nee for photographing turnstiles on the Los Angeles Metro, asking if he planned to sell the photos to al-Qaeda and threatening to put his name on the FBI's "hit list." On another occasion, deputies ordered Nee not to photograph on the sidewalk outside the W Hotel at Hollywood Boulevard and Vine Street on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. LASD deputies detained and searched Shane Quentin, a photographer with an M.F.A. from UC Irvine, while he was photographing brilliantly lit refineries in south Los Angeles at night, frisking him and placing him in the back of a squad car for about forty-five minutes before releasing him.

This is scary stuff, people. Journalists are some of the few citizens out there who get to police the police. If photogs are treated to Third World-style detention, this could seriously upset our democratic system.

Peter Bibring, senior staff attorney at the ACLU:

Photography is not a crime. It's protected First Amendment expression. Sheriff's deputies violate the Constitution's core protections when they detain and search people who are doing nothing wrong. To single them out for such treatment while they're pursuing a constitutionally protected activity is doubly wrong.

This could require federal intervention. Or, as we've suggested previously, maybe a flash mob, this time to take shots outside sheriff's headquarters, would send a message.

[Update]: We talked to Bibring, the ACLU senior staff attorney who has taken the lead on this case.

For one thing, our joke about being detained for taking notes is no joke. Under this policy taking notes around public buildings and places of interest is considered suspicious activity. Really.

Why not go after the Long Beach Police Department for its similar harassment?

Interesting story:

Bibring says that the "suspicious activity" policy enacted by many departments in the last few years is actually based on an LAPD initiative that lists 48 activities, including taking pictures (with "no aesthetic value") and notes, that could be considered suspect in a post-9/11 world.

As you might know, L.B. Chief McDonnel is an ex-LAPD Chief of Staff.

The counsel said that the sheriff's department, however, seemed to have the most incidents and most aggressive policing of people taking pictures, thus the ACLU targeted it in hopes of setting a precedent that would be followed by all departments.

"Police officers can always ask questions and engage with the community," Bibring says, "but they can't frisk, search and treat us as criminal suspects when we're engaged in constitutionally protected activity."

When we mentioned that this was an especially dangerous tactic given that the press have a role in policing the police, Bibring told us the suit (link here) mentions an incident in which LA Weekly photographer Ted Soqui was allegedly harassed at the sheriff's controlled L.A. County Jail while taking shots for a cover story on deputies accused of beating people inside the facility.

That's one way of doing p.r. According to the suit six deputies showed up to deal with Soqui as he snapped shots of the jailhouse and a bail bonds business from a sidewalk. They allegedly told him photography wasn't allowed on Bauchet Street and that this was an issue of "national security."

When Soqui refused to tell them what the story was about that he was working on, one of the deputies even put his hand on is gun, according to the suit: The cops searched Soqui.

Soqui was not named as a plaintiff, however.

[@dennisjromero/djromero@laweekly.com]


My Voice Nation Help
22 comments
Christopher Buttner
Christopher Buttner

This from RadioBoston, August 30, 2011: "The U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling that affirmed, stronger than ever, the rights of individuals to openly record the actions of police officers." http://radioboston.wbur.org/20....

Makowmakow
Makowmakow

YEAH?????? WELL I'd like to strap on a 300 2.8 and ASS RAPE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THESE RANCID FUCKING PIGZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

PIGZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ IS ALL THEY ARE

I HAVE ZERO RESPECT FOR ANYONE WHO BECOMES OR STAYS A COP IN THIS DAY AND AGE

YEAH THAT IS WITH THE PETAL SHAPED LENS SHADE ON FOR MAXIMUM PLEASURE FOR THESE PIGZZZZ IN CASE U R WONDERING THATS JUST HOW I ROLL BABY

Dmead516
Dmead516

This is nothing new-if anyone has ever read the magazines from Great Britain, they have been dealing with this klind of harassment from the cops for several years. Of course, leave it to California to start this trend!

Sunshine1011
Sunshine1011

Yet the moment some muslim terrorist is taking pictures of the same refinery, taking "notes" at the courthouse and then he bombs it, the exact same "journalists" will be all over the cops for not doing their job.

And like any story like this, we only get to hear one side and it is always the "innocent" photographer who was just minding his own business, not causing any problems.

Meme Meyagi
Meme Meyagi

sunshine you bring a good point, so why exactly are mooslimes allowed to live in usa when all of them are terrorists?

Anonymous
Anonymous

Oh please, this is the worst kind of self-justifying bullshit. All the 'muslim terrorists' have to do is log into Google Street view. And yes, the photographers are 'innocent' because the legal system SAYS they are. Innocent until proven guilty, not guilty because some cop decides he's having a bad day and wants to fuck with someone. In a story like this, there's no Other Side. There's legal and illegal and the cops are on the wrong side of the law.

Anonymous
Anonymous

This should be elevated to a suit that follows the "Bivens vs Six Unnamed Agents" precedent:  according to the Supreme Courtt's decision in this case, McDonnell and those who acted in concert with him are [and should be] responsible personally.  The SC says that sovereign immunity does not protect against personal responsibility for violating Constitutional rights.

Chinggis Khaan
Chinggis Khaan

These pigs should be going to jail for outright corruption. Trying to implement policies that violate our rights that people have died to preserve and harassment. If their going to push these Nazi tactics, it's time to get armed and fight back. It's time to take our country back from the terrorist running it.

Sunshine1011
Sunshine1011

You win the "funniest post of the week" award.  And I bet you typed this from your mothers basement, right?

ZawRoo
ZawRoo

And they wonder why we rejoice everytime some stupid cop gets clipped in the line of duty!anon-toolz.tk

funnyandspicy
funnyandspicy

9/11 really was an excuse for every sort of tyranny available, wasn't it? A country which once prided itself on being the bastion of Democracy, looks more and more like a Communist state with very passing day! http://goo.gl/D4BMF

Cliff Chesley
Cliff Chesley

$$

Domenico Foschi
Domenico Foschi

I have been in the same situation. I am a street photographer and I often roam the Los ANgeles streets. When stopped by two cops for taking pictures of people I replied them I was doing nothing illegal and I showed them a sheet on Photographers rights that I always used to have with me in my bag. One of the cops, literally foaming from his mouth, asked me if I thought he didn't know the law. I replied I didn't know that, but what I did know was that the sheet I was presenting him WAS the law. The young cop got really upset, and his partner as soon as he saw that took charge and diffused the situation a bit, still claiming though, that I couldn't take pictures.It's worrisome that this is happening and I completely share KT view on the matter.I want ton thank LA Weekly for being one of the few magazines out there still worth reading. A bit rough at the edges, but that is what we need now.

KatDJ
KatDJ

Thats so smart that you take that sheet with you. You rock man!

KT
KT

This is truly terrifying on a lot of levels, and I think your statement about "policing the police" pretty much sums up the issue.  

One thing that really bothers me is this "no aesthetic value" nonsense. I mean, first, that's clearly in violation of the First Amendment.  Second, given that *nobody* can judge "aesthetic value" for *anyone* else (one man's trash is another man's treasure and all that), how is a cop suddenly an arbiter of what constitutes aesthetic value?  Third, isn't this policy (not a law) in violation of the Fourth Amendment protection from unreasonable search and seizure?  It's very totalitarian in its flavor.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city