Top

blog

Stories

 

Occupy L.A.: City Hall Plans To Clear The Camp As Early As Monday

Categories: Occupy L.A.
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for city hall occupy la.jpg
Simone Wilson
Updated below with details from today's meeting.

L.A. City Hall officials informed representatives of Occupy L.A. today that they intend to clear out the two-month-old encampment sometime next week.

The Occupiers will be given 72 hours' notice to pack up and get out. City officials said the "evacuation" could take place as early as Monday.

The Occupiers are meeting now to plan their next move.

Though L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has been more tolerant than other mayors, he has lately been getting impatient with the Occupy movement.

The mayor's staff has been meeting with Occupy representatives, in hopes of brokering some mutually agreeable exit.

But those talks broke down Tuesday, after details of the city's offer for subsidized office space were disclosed at Monday's General Assembly meeting.

Occupy L.A. rejected that offer on Tuesday night, by which time it had already been withdrawn.

More details to come...

Mario Brito and Jim Lafferty, two members of Occupy's City Liaison team, addressed the group a short time ago. They said they walked out of today's meeting at City Hall because they believed that the mayor's staff is not negotiating in good faith. Others with the Occupy movement, however, continued to negotiate.

The message from the mayor's staff was that there is a firm deadline in place for the "closure" of the City Hall park, and it's next week. Brito and Lafferty said they intended to rally support from SEIU and from clergy members. But they are also trying to prepare the group for mass arrests.

No confirmation or comment yet from the mayor's office.

Update:
The mayor's office has confirmed that City Hall Park will close next week.

"The encampment as it exists is unsustainable," Deputy Mayor Matt Szabo told the AP.

Update 2, 4:30 p.m.: Occupy L.A. has posted notes from today's meeting with the mayor's office. And once again, you can see a total disconnect between the two camps.

Here's Szabo explaining why the camp has to shut down:
Most reasonable people would understand that what is going on down there is not sustainable. You don't have the right by yourselves to occupy forever a public park. The public does not come through there every day as they have before. It is not a place that can be taken by [one] group for one cause. You're prohibiting others from using public space. My boss [Villaraigosa] has been fighting on your side [aclu] his entire career, but he does have the job of protecting public assets for the public.
And here's Lafferty giving an impassioned defense of Occupy L.A.:
WHY IS THERE SUDDENLY A RUSH? Why is Monday more important than the process of finding a resolution? I can't get my mind around it! You can talk about sanitation, dope, dead grass, etc on the media. But WE ALL KNOW, THE 500 PEOPLE ALL KNOW, THAT IT IS ALL BULLSHIT. I'm not angry with you, Matt, I have a hunch you're as disappointed with all of us There is NO HUMAN, MORAL, ETHICAL REASON TO RUSH TO AN END GAME. NOW HARM WILL BE DONE.
Not a lot of common ground there. Lafferty then walked out, and apparently is now planning to file an injunction in a last-ditch effort to prevent the city from clearing the camp.

Also worth noting: Lafferty said the city had promised to give 72 hours' notice. However, the notes of the meeting don't say that. All it says is that Occupy will get "notice." Could be five minutes, for all we know.

Obviously, that's important, because the more advance warning Occupy L.A. gets, the more time they have to rally supporters to come to City Hall to block the eviction.

Update 3: Here's the official statement from the mayor's office. Note that there's no 72-hour-notice provision:
Today, the Mayor's office informed members of Occupy LA that City Hall park will be closed at some point next week for rehabilitation. Members of Occupy LA will be given sufficient notice prior to the closure.
Still unclear: What rules will apply post-eviction?

Update 4: The LAPD is explicitly trying to avoid "another Oakland," per the notes from today's meeting. The notes quote an unidentified LAPD representative warning that there will be more officers around the camp in coming days.

"The use of force will be determined by the actions in the camp," the LAPD rep said. "I'm not looking to have Oakland. But I don't want officers shot with paint, fire extinguishers, etc."

First posted at 2:16 p.m.


My Voice Nation Help
13 comments
Mel
Mel

"The encampment as it exists is unsustainable," I say: Life as it exists is unsustainable.My God!! Did you watch the youtube videos of Black Friday? Why don't you go and evict the "People" who are truly responsible for this mess. And it's much bigger than the mess in your local Occupy "encampment".."But I don't want officers shot with paint, fire extinguishers, etc."Well, WE DON'T WANT CITIZENS SHOT WITH CANISTERS, PEPPER SPRAY , PLASTIC BULLETS, AND HIT WITH BATONS. If you give them FAIR WARNING and the masses come .. ISN'T THAT A SIGN OF WHAT YOUR COMMUNITY WANTS.. Why don't you listen up!?

WalterIII
WalterIII

Just a hint, a mere clue: If you don't want citizens shot with canisters, pepper spray, plastic bullets, and batons, you just may want to consider vacating city hall park by midnight Sunday. 

Just curious, how about non-citizens? You are ok with them being shot?

WSmith
WSmith

So, whatever happened to ...First Amendment to the United States Constitution"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Guest
Guest

Here is what happened. The right to peaceably assemble does not mean you can pitch a freakin' tent. The right to assemble is NOT an absolute right.There are restrictions on this right as there are with other rights. The rightto assemble is not as strongly protected by the government as with otherrights, such as the freedom of speech. This is because groups that assembleoften do so not with just speech, but with some type of conduct such aspicketing, protesting, marching, or gathering in a park which may disrupt thepolice.Thus, the courts have ruled that while it is theresponsibility of the government to protect the people's right to assemble, itis also the responsibility of the government to keep the peace. Because ofthis, the courts have allowed governments to make reasonable restrictions onthe time, place, and manner of these assemblies. The government may placerestrictions on the right to assemble that will maintain law and order,facilitate traffic, protect private property, and reduce noise congestion. Sothese rights are NOT absolute rights.

TeaBagPartyRules
TeaBagPartyRules

WARNING: 1% asshole above, who does not believe in freedom and the right to protest.  He wants everyone to fall in line and be good little robots who go to work, watch TV, buy things and die.  Idiot...

WalterIII
WalterIII

Mr. Tea Bag: "Guest" must have struck a nerve with ya for you to resort to name calling.

Guest never said anything about the right to protest. Just 13 words and you derived all that outta that post? 

You are a boogerhead. 

focus!
focus!

OMG!! billflyby!!If only the Government would be so vigilant with the people who are destroying the Economy, Ecology and Spreading their Corruption World Wide.Stop focusing on the "rights" of the campers and focus on the damn message already. BTW, "protests" are like a strike.. do you understand that? Strikes are about causing disruption.. That's how you get the people to pay attention and care about issues at hand. Like say, SOCIAL JUSTICE!! Which right now is affecting all sectors. From your teachers to you nurses. From your pilots to your Postal Service. And so on and so forth. I don't know about you, but I'd rather have some campers on a lawn in a park, then some pissed off Pilot flying the plane I'm in. 

Guest
Guest

Exactly! Labor unions are corrupt as hell.

Oh well.

You guys WERE the 99%...

akavillar
akavillar

i hope these folks can stay forever.  what better illustration of the world view of obama and the national socialist (former democrat) party than a permanent camp of vermin encrusted loserson land payed for by taxpayers.  it's perfect.

Ego
Ego

you are an idiot.  If you own a gun, please point it at your head and pull the trigger ASAP!

Jared Iorio
Jared Iorio

Hey Gene, Jared Iorio here. The Los Angeles General Assembly just passed a group-authored response to the City. Hundreds of voices weighed in on the City's offer -- and this is what we got. There was also a statement made by the Assembly saying that the only way to negotiate with us was through the direct democratic process of the GA.

A link to our response:

http://losangelesga.net/2011/1...

Guest
Guest

Yes my friends, but ALL of this discussion is irrelevant as the general assembly is THE decision-making body of Occupy LA so any of these other negotiations do not matter in the least.

That "We're not Moving" song would come in handy at check-out time. 

I also love the idea of a $10 thousand "wrongful eviction" lawsuit, yeah, like that's gonna fly. Wouldn't one need a contract first?

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Home

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city