Top

blog

Stories

 

Metro Chastised for Poor Civil Rights Practices

Categories: Transportation

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for metro graph.jpg
thestrategycenter.org
Bus Riders Union was right all along
Update: Bus Riders Union issues statement on the release of civil rights compliance review. More after the jump.

In October, L.A. Weekly reported that local civil rights groups indicted Metro for discriminatory practices. The groups hoped their report would spark the feds to intervene. Well, as it turns out, it did.

The Federal Transit Administration released its civil rights compliance review of Metro today. The result -- bad news for Metro.

According to Metro's blog The Source, "the review found that Metro did not fully follow federal regulations and guidance when the agency made service and fare changes."

In other words, the Bus Riders Union was right to question Metro's practices.

Bus Riders Union lead organizer Esperanza Martinez told the Weekly in October that "the rail does not serve the a large sector of Los Angeles' native community and that Metro does not place black, brown, and working class people at the center."

Update: Bus Riders Union organizer Sunyoung Yang issued a statement calling the review "the most serious compliance review findings issued in at least a decade."

Here is some more from the statement:

According to Richard Marcantonio, a senior attorney at the civil rights law firm Public Advocates Inc. and a national expert on civil rights enforcement, these findings are a landmark for transit civil rights. "FTA's findings are a damning indictment of a transit agency that was under a federal civil rights Consent Decree for 10 years. The strongest compliance findings we had seen from FTA previously were last year against BART. The BART findings sent shock waves across the country. This is BART times ten."

And an excerpt from the federal civil rights review:

The FTA audit of Metro was not an investigation to determine the merit of any specific discrimination complaints filed against Metro. However, it did find deficiencies with the methodologies and processes that Metro uses to assess impacts of fare and service changes on minorities and low-income people.
Metro has already responded to its punishment by creating a civil rights corrective action plan, which they posted within their blog post today.

Funny how Metro already had a 47-page document ready on the day the results were released, but at least they are owning up to their mistakes.

My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
TITAVIAN
TITAVIAN

METRO IS REALLY GOOD ON TELLING PEOPLE THAT THEY ARE CREATING NEW LINES BUT , HONESTLY THERE IS NO NEW LINES THEY JUST DEVIDE LONG LINES THEN LET THE RIDER PAY TWICE AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT CLOSELY IT IS GOOD ONLY FOR  CREATING REVENUES BUT THE LINE IS THE SAME AS BEFORE CHECK THIS LINES 90 ,91, 94 ,92 , AND WHAT HAPPEN TO LINE 902 THAT WAS SUPPOSE TO BE ALLOTED TO THE SAN FERNANDO VALLY PASSENGER THEY TOOK IT OUT COMPLETELY.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city