Top

blog

Stories

 

Sarah Mason, TIME's Protester of the Year: More Photos, Details Behind Occupy L.A. Cover

Categories: Occupy L.A.

sarah mason face.jpg
UPI
Sarah Mason, TIME covergirl sans beanie and bandana, far left.
Update, December 28: Occupy L.A. photos by Ted Soqui, the LA Weekly photographer behind the TIME cover, are going on exhibit at the gallery where Sarah Mason works.

Updated on second page with even more up-close shots of Mason -- these ones taken by Soqui. Originally posted December 15 at 4:40 p.m.

Ah, the elusive Sarah Mason -- she of the knit yellow cap and 99 percent bandana, gracing TIME's already iconic "Person of the Year" cover for 2011, yet turning her face from this new spotlight and returning no press calls (that we know of).

Just as any good, principled occupier would do. However, because we're mildly obsessed at this point, we spent the day ravaging the Internet for photos, videos and stories that could fill in the holes behind Mason's cover shoot.

time cover protester shepard fairey original photo ted soqui 2.jpg
Ted Soqui
time protester.jpg
TIME Magazine
(Which was, as we already told you, shot by LA Weekly freelancer Ted Soqui and cartoonified by L.A. street artist Shepard Fairey. See right.)

Mission accomplished. It appears the dreamy-eyed 25-year-old was among 20 Occupy L.A. protesters who linked arms in a circle around a pop-up encampment at the center of Bank of America Plaza on November 17. That day's march had begun at a downtown intersection, where LAPD riot cops arrested various protesters for failure to disperse, and ended at the B of A.

Mason -- a Highland resident who works at a Santa Monica art gallery -- was arrested at sundown, as was the rest of the elbow-linked chain. The bandana she wore was reportedly soaked in vinegar, "just in case the police sprayed them with gas or pepper spray."

sarah mason ring close small.jpg
Reuters
Mason, second from right.
(Occupy factions across the country held demonstrations on the same date -- a "National Day of Action" meant to remind Wall Street and the 1 percent that the Occupy movement was still alive and growing on its two-month anniversary. A massive march and police crackdown likewise took place in New York.)

Back in L.A., Occupy was hoping to set up a mini camp outside the Bank of America to supplement their sardine-packed encampment on the L.A. City Hall lawn.

But police officers (and the banksters in the B of A high-rise) weren't having it. Tension was high between cops and protesters as rubber-bullet guns were cocked and tents ripped from their stakes. And at nightfall, 20 arrests were made -- nothing like the eventual raid on the City Hall encampment, which ended in almost 300 arrests (some allegedly brutal), but the biggest clash up to that point.

sarah mason bank of america sign right.jpg
Ted Fisher
Mason, in yellow, far right.
On the night of the final raid, Mason explained to the Los Angeles Times that she could no longer stand her ground because of the jailing on the day of her cover shoot.

Protesters Sarah Mason and Scott Shuster did decide to leave, because both said they couldn't risk arrest.

Mason, who was arrested during a protest at Bank of America this month, said, "There's no curfew on the 1st Amendment."

sarah mason's hands.jpg
UPI
Mason's hands.
Shuster, the guy she was apparently hanging with that night, now tells the Times that Mason "was surprised and a little embarrassed to see her picture on the cover of Time." However, he might be a little biased:

He said she had earned the honor for her work at Occupy, where she is known as a consensus builder who once taught police how to participate in the protest's nightly general assembly meeting. Shuster said Occupy had helped Mason grow politically and personally.

"She found her voice," he said, and then paused. "I'm probably not the best person to ask, though. I've had a crush on her since the moment I met her."

A little awkward, but by all accounts, she was a magnetic person to be around. Soqui, the photographer behind the TIME cover, tells the Weekly that he was immediately drawn to her as a subject, though "when I was taking the pictures, she was real nervous, and I was just trying to calm her down." (He eventually did so by telling her he worked for this newspaper. Boo-ya. Soqui has also spoken with Mason since the TIME issue came out, and says she's "truly humbled by it. She says, 'It's not about me.'")

More fawning: A couple days before the Bank of America action, NPR called her a "tall, 25-year-old [who] could be a GAP model." She was having a bit of an existential crisis at that point:

SARAH MASON: I am here because I feel a moral obligation to speak out against injustice.

NPR: Mason has been camping out here a few weeks, but leaves each day for her full-time job at an art gallery in Santa Monica. She admits to getting weary, and lately has been thinking...

MASON: What are we doing here? You know, what is - what is the point of this? You know, can't we be doing this at home? Can't we be doing this somewhere else?

sarah mason standing ring right.jpeg
The Montreal Gazette
Mason, in green and black, fourth from right.
The most thorough character profile of Mason we've seen so far is by Cady Lang, for 360 Magazine. Some fun facts from the exhaustive piece:

  • Though Mason's small gray tent was unassuming from the outside, the inside was "a bohemian paradise, complete with tapestries, blankets and pillows in rich earthy tones, candles and picture frames" and "a cozy haven where one can hide from the chaos of a bustling day in downtown Los Angeles."
  • Mason has "inky dark hair and bluntly cut bangs" and a "straightforward, frank attitude." She also has a "girlfriend" named Meagan.
  • A dark, telling moment in her past: Mason accrued massive debt on a credit card issued to her by Bank of America, because of what she calls "pressure to look a certain way" -- perhaps contributing to her participation on November 17, and her current discomfort with all this celebrity. More from 360:

Mason is quick to assess that weakness though, noting that she still struggles now with spending. Her current job is at an art gallery in Santa Monica, where she's felt the pressure to keep up appearances.

"Being in Southern California, being around people where image or being on the cutting edge is priority puts me in a situation where I feel more conscious of myself; now, I'm working at an art gallery where image is very important, and I struggle with it still," she divulges matter-of-factly. "I frequently find myself walking around stores in the mall, ready to make big purchases, and buy impulsively just because I feel insecure. I make myself reflect, and then I'm like no."

OK, now that we know more about Sarah Mason than we do our own grandmother, we can get back to stalking nobodies like Lindsay Lohan and appreciating Occupy, instead, for what it needs to be -- a sea of discontented faces, not one beautiful set of eyebrows on the front of TIME Magazine.

However, we do wish TIME and Fairey would stop pretending its cover art isn't a single person existing in a single moment. From their "making of" story:

As the artist behind our Person of the Year 2011 cover commemorating this year's pick, The Protester, Fairey says his cover image is based on a composite of 26 different photographs of real protests from around the world. "These organic protest movements have arisen around the globe and a lot of it was fueled by social media, but it was a pervasive phenomenon," he said. "It wasn't one specific movement but general unrest. I wanted to look for ideas to represent that." ...

Though the protests themselves have been anything up light, Fairey didn't want the image to feel menacing. "A lot of these people are not threatening," he said. "A lot of them are just regular folks who feel dissatisfied." Instead he wanted to create something that "meant business, but wasn't scary." He used a collage of scenes from the Arab Spring to Moscow to Occupy Wall Street as a backdrop, images he said shows the dramatic accumulation of these global protests rather than displaying them as isolated events. 

BS. We found the soft-lidded, isolated one, and her name is Sarah Mason. "The spirit is definitely Sarah's," Soqui tells Metro. "The other 25 images wouldn't really support it." Watch her sing a solidarity song to riot cops with hundreds of her comrades, below. (She's the one in the yellow hat. Obviously.)

Soqui's entire November 17 photo shoot of Mason, on second page.


My Voice Nation Help
24 comments
Jason Rohrer
Jason Rohrer

Regarding the Time Magazine cover being a composite of 26 different photographs, it is. You just didn't look close enough. The other photographs are layers that create the texture over the main image of Sarah Mason. 

SuzanneGat
SuzanneGat

@Lawe Sarah Mason protester of the year...It’s unbelievable my buddy's step-sister makes USD77/hr on the internet. She has been out of work for 5 months but last month her income was USD7463 just working on the internet for a few hours. Here's the site to read more... http://linkpot.net/dumpy/

Mikoe Wozz
Mikoe Wozz

Another restaurant cliaimed to use fresh mozz arella cheese,where it'sdishes were actually made with economy cheddar.the "freshpasta"advertieshed on another meau tumed out to be frozen.--Agedate. ℃⊙M--anice and free place for younger women and older men,or older women and youngermen,to interact with each other

Nathanlee
Nathanlee

Nice one time. Picking the some random White girl with hot eyeballs. Not one of them other protesters...like the guy who lit himself up in Tunisia. He was too Brown.

Craig Toennies
Craig Toennies

"Dreamy-eyed?" Really? Because I see a steely, principled resolve in my sister, Sarah Mason's eyes. I guess this kind of passive, almost unintentional sexualization of women (who are CLEARLY protesting - not posing for fucking cameras of their own volition and for their own profit) is what passes as the end result of modern feminism in America? You might as well have written, "We want to fuck that doe-eyed lesbian straight." 

Nice work, Simone. I couldn't have effectively dismissed a woman of principle by lauding her physical traits any more if I tried to impose my own male privilege... Perhaps you want to analyze her wardrobe from N17? Should we talk about her choice of a wool cap, her accessories (A bandana - for pepper-spray! How utilitarian!), or any more of her post-apocalyptic American "ensemble?" Maybe next week...For fuck's sake... I thought the LA Weekly was "down." It appears, however, you're just another individual-adoring, patriarchy-reinforcing bastion of idiocy. This entire piece is unprincipled, fawning fucking dreck and the author should be kicked in the vagina repeatedly for all eternity in the second circle of hell (the one reserved for "lust") for contributing to the delinquency of our culture, its ongoing and pervasive moral turpitude (and by moral, I mean - objectifying women systematically to marginalize their voices), and the 'cult of personality' worshipping mindlessness that is embodied by similar "celebrity worship."Sarah Mason is not a celebrity. She didn't ask to be considered a "GAP model," to have her life reduced to so much fodder for the voracious appetite of our sheepish consumer society, to have her hairstyle obsessed over (how many like blog posts exist about Mario Brito's hair or superficial appearance, who has been likewise adored and thrust into the spotlight - not by OLA - but by the LA press?), or to have her personal life thrown out for every troll to cast their unqualified excretions upon? Maybe someone should do a "what does Simone Wilson look like" hit piece? I'd personally love to read about where the author of this blog gets her makeup, what purse she carries with what shoes, and all the other important aspects of journalism... /sarcasm

How little did Sarah Mason feel comfortable being exploited by a photographer like this, or the potential for that photograph to become exactly what it has become - without her consent? 

"when I was taking the pictures, she was real nervous, and I was just trying to calm her down." (He eventually did so by telling her he worked for this newspaper. Boo-ya."  - SoquiI'd be willing to bet Mason wouldn't be consoled anymore by his involvement with this paper, or with the Leni Riefenstahl of corporatism - Shepherd Fairey . And this piece is precisely why...

The fact is, we are all Sarah Mason. And we should all be fucking ashamed of ourselves.

Justin Hampton
Justin Hampton

Please, Craig. The amount of self-righteousness and exceptionalism you ladle on with a backhoe here is really quite embarrassing. Moreover, it's outrageously sexist in its own right. Sarah, and any other woman involved in Occupy, can stand on her own two feet. They're not so weak that they need YOU to defend them your own distorted, quasi-feminist and utterly immature objectifications of them in full display. 

I mean, come on - whatever else you want to say about Farey (and I totally agree with you on his cynical aesthetic thievery.) and Time, they don't need to pay ANYONE to take a photo in a public place where no one has any specific expectation of privacy. If she signed a release, that ends it right there. She's a protester involved in a political action, not a Wilhelmina model. And neither she nor anyone else can pick and choose the sorts of coverage she'll receive, or the reactions it will engender. 

It's called freedom of expression, Craig. Not yours, Craig - EVERYONE'S. Get used to it, or get off the streets, because their view of events belongs there every bit as much as yours does.

Theotherguy
Theotherguy

I love the Meteors.  The Zorch Men are coming.

rickabrams
rickabrams

Yes, let's do this fluff piece on history and kill any current stories relating to billions of dollars of corruption at City Hall so as not to displease mayor-wanne-be Garcetti

hdmi
hdmi

Maybe she'll get the Nobel Peace Prize.

ZangKoo2
ZangKoo2

It really does make me wonder who comes up with all that stuff. Wow.www.Total-Privacy dot US

ShakinBoots
ShakinBoots

Simone is confused. Sarah is "NOT Time's protester of the year." She has been made into a cartoon character meant to represent ALL protesters. Ironically, Time, Shepard Fairey and Ted are making money from her image. Did Sarah get paid? Hmmmm???

This article is SO creepy, not even in a fun way. It's plain old internet stalking. Simone, get a grip.

It's WEIRD that she's trying soooo hard to make this girl look like some sort of hero. And no, she does NOT look like a model. Not saying she's hidious but why are people trying to make her something she's not? Weeiird! It's one random person in group of protesters who happend to get her picture taken. Big woopty doo. Babies do it everyday. As far as people calling her intelligent, the only intelligent thing I can see she's done, is to not return media calls.

She SHOULD return the money she stole from Bank of America. B of A should be protesting her ass. She's just as culpable as they are. She spent $$$ she didn't have and now thinks she's some kind of rebel for reneging on her promise to pay it back. Two wrongs don't make a right...right!? P.S. Shepard Fairey seems to lie about much of his art. We can all see that is not a composite of 26 images.

Jason Rohrer
Jason Rohrer

Fairey didn't make a dime off of this. He sold 450 prints at $60 each and donated all of it to the occupy movement. In fact, he lost money on the cost of producing the prints. 

As for it being a composite of 26 images, it is. The other images are layers over the main photograph.

Next time you want to question someone's intelligence or integrity, you might want to look in the mirror and question your own. 

ShakinBoots
ShakinBoots

You should get your facts straight before you so wholeheartedly support someone's false statements (Fairey's).

I know all about layers and compositing. That photo is NOT a composite of 26 images...period. In fact, once Fairey was called out on it, he changed his own story to say that he was given 26 different images TO CHOOSE FROM. Go ahead, check his website. He backed off on his own false claim. Fairey has been caught in lies before. Even TMZ caught him on tape chewing his wife out for saying he doesn't do most of his own work anymore.

And don't think he didn't keep a little extra change for himself. He had to sell rights to the image in order for it to even be published. You can be sure he kept that money. We're not just talking about selling posters.

Still asking: Did Sarah get paid?

I question everything and will continue to do so. That's the difference between a thinker and a programmed robot.

Mafundi421
Mafundi421

I am one of the initiators of Occupy LA and Occupy The Hood LA Action Assembly....one of the hightlights of occupying LA City Hall was meeting and getting to know Sarah Mason...Yet why no pics of the many people of color that also were part of the occupy movement in LA?  Oh thats right...if you white... its allright...if you Black get back....Time magazine is still racist as it wants to be.  But, right on for Sarah....you go girl!

Leigh Conner
Leigh Conner

As someone who knows and went to college with Sarah, I can attest to the fact that she is as amazing as (and even better than) this article makes her out to be. She is principled, courageous, intelligent, and inspirational.

Paul
Paul

“Each paycheck that I would get, I would overspend. I got a credit card because I had no money and I needed a credit card to buy things that were essential to my life during this time. I had already spent all this money on clothes, make-up, accessories, and I got the credit card because I needed to pay my electric bill."

“I still have debt and I’m not paying it back because I feel like at this point, I have an obligation to try and disrupt and upset the financial industry, the credit industry…”

Nothing she has said is principled, courageous, intelligent, or inspirational. Consumer who spent too much, and now refuses to pay back for her lack of understanding income vs. expenses. There are plenty of people who can balance their budgets to avoid this situation - however, THAT requires intelligence, courage, and principles.

klgrider
klgrider

It is so very convenient to preach "personal responsibility" about all this consumer/credit/popular culture crap, but really, who's winning at this game? Does Bank of America suffer because of the Sarah Mason's of the world who they have deliberately and artfully manipulated and then sucked completely dry to the point that she (a young person trying to get her life started in a nearly impossible economy for anyone who does not already "have it all") dares to say "This is wrong. I've had enough! They don't play fair and I'm out." 

The one percent are not victims here. Sure, everyone should pay their debts, but the balance of the moral wrongdoing is clearly on the side of the privileged and powerful who deliberately set these processes in motion. They knowingly - expertly - created addicts just like the tobacco companies did. 

And they did a damn good job. They wanted to wring out every possible penny from every naive and vulnerable young, poor, minority, or other kind of "have not" who dared to think he or she might actually have a shot at this great shiny, picture perfect American Dream. They said, "Sure. You can buy that xyz-gottahavit useless piece of crap that has captured the current consumer culture short span of attention. You can, in fact, buy ten of them! You can, and you must, or you do not matter. Your are not legitimate. 

These credit card companies wanted to take consumers beyond the limits of their ability to repay. They wanted to feed on people's vulnerabilities and weaknesses, and take advantage of them for their own profit - to "capitalize" on them. 

Don't cry and whine about them not getting their $2000 from Sarah Mason. They are a deeply faulted parasitic slime that is killing its host. You idiots who think people like Sarah Mason bear the brunt of responsibility for this mess are deluded by the business/finance propaganda machine! Wake up. Free yourselves. There is a new world dawning and it's face is that of Sarah Mason - a real life, hero of the 99%!

Christopher Neal
Christopher Neal

Yes, but where does personal responsibility come in? The evil "they" as you put "knowingly--expertly--created addicts like tobacco companies did" - wouldn't it be nice if there was absolutely no accountability at all?"Buy ten of them, you can, you must... Or you do not matter, you are illegitimate." Not logical at all.And if the new world's face is that of Sarah Mason, I say put a bag over it.

Anonymous
Anonymous

most Time magazine readers are birds in their cages. then they shit on the cover.

Mlwues34
Mlwues34

Really most TIME magazine readers are birds in cages! I have fought in 4 wars and 3 peace missions !What have you a##h##s done for 99%! Go interlock hands and cry that there is different classess! Well if you want communism ? Come out and say you want communism bbecause it has never worked and never will! You thinkj Obama is a savior! ALL RIGHT WAIT TILL H GETS RE ELECTED AND SEE WHERE ARE COUNTRY IS IN 5 MORE YEARS OF HIS COMMUNIST RULE!

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

Home

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city