Top

blog

Stories

 

West Hollywood City Council: Will John Duran and John D'Amico Bring Change in 2012?


west-follywood.4625588.40.jpg
Ted Soqui
WeHo City Council member John D'Amico
We're all for protecting bicyclists, the humane treatment of puppies, reasonably guarding the health of restaurant and bar workers against second-hand smoke, and many of the other feel-good, headline-grabbing ordinances the five members of the West Hollywood City Council consider on a regular basis, but how about undertaking legislation that actually matters?

It's been nine months since West Hollywood voters unseated incumbent Lindsey Horvath, moving power away from council members Abbe Land and John Heilman and into the hands of John Duran and John D'Amico, with Jeff Prang acting as a sympathetic swing vote for the latter two.

West Hollywood voters, as a result, have expected big changes at City Hall, but there's a vibe among community activists that Duran and D'Amico have not fully utilized their new power to make the city a better, more citizen-friendly place. In 2012, we hope things will be different, and we have a few suggestions for where they can start.

Possibly the most important change Duran and D'Amico can institute is how West Hollywood conducts its elections.

WeHo has chronically low voter turnout every campaign season, which incumbents aren't all that upset about -- for various reasons, fewer voters make it easier for incumbents to get re-elected.

As a result, politicians like John Heilman stay in office for too long, the city is run like a fiefdom that's there for the pleasure and benefits of elected officials rather than serving its citizens, all sorts of power cliques form, and the city becomes more like a monarchy than a democracy.

Yet the city that likes to consider itself a progressive beacon for the rest of the world could easily improve voter turnout and democracy in West Hollywood by switching to mail-in balloting -- it would also probably cost less to hold an election that way.

In the L.A. Weekly cover story "West Follywood," experts say it's a no brainer. Citizens get their ballots in the mail, they check off their favorite candidates, send the ballots back to City Hall, and, wallah, it's over.

Part of the problem with elections in this small city is that a lot of people don't even know they're happening. A ballot in the mail would certainly change that, and the convenience is sure to create a spike in voting totals and improve democratic participation.

Even better, new blood with fresh ideas may get elected and the self-serving politics that plagues West Hollywood City Hall will end ... or at least be diminished.

Another thing we often hear is that City Hall is filled with staffers who are deadwood, and deadwood that costs taxpayers a lot of money in salaries and health benefits.

Not only that, the deadwood staffers have been working there for years and years and often have strong allegiances to long-time incumbent John Heilman, who's been serving himself -- sorry, we mean the city -- since 1985.

With staffers serving the interests of Heilman and not the residents, it's no wonder change comes slow at City Hall. Clear out the deadwood!

West Hollywood politicians, particularly Heilman, always talk about creating more affordable housing. Sounds great, but their solutions are unimaginative and often don't serve gays and lesbians, who make up nearly 40 percent of WeHo's population.

How about affordable housing for gay and lesbian seniors? We recently talked with an older gay man who's been living in West Hollywood for his entire adult life and doesn't want to move. But high rents are making it more difficult for him to stay, and we have no doubt that there are many others facing the same situation.

In addition, many younger gays and lesbians, who used to flock to West Hollywood, also can't afford rent in the city and live somewhere else. Why not create affordable housing for them, too?

Shouldn't West Hollywood, one of the world's gay meccas, be more than a temporary destination for gay tourists? Why not lure and help gays and lesbians to stay in the city?

One good change by John Duran has been that the West Hollywood Recovery Center, an invaluable place that serves thousands of recovering alcoholics and drug addicts, appears to be safe from relocation -- there had been plans at City Hall turn it into a childcare center.

The recovery center is smack dab in the middle of Boys Town on Robertson Boulevard with easy, walkable access for many people. And there's a huge parking garage down the street. We can't think of another neighborhood in WeHo that's more appropriate for a recovery center.

The location is also highly visible, letting active addicts know as they walk to the nearby Abbey or some other bar that there is help literally around the corner.

Let's hope that the City Council follows through on its new intention to offer the recovery center a long-term lease.

These things are much more needed than new bicycle lanes, don't you think?

Forget about banning fur and the rest. Real people with real needs need real solutions in West Hollywood. The time has come for change and substantive policy making.

Contact Patrick Range McDonald at pmcdonald@laweekly.com.


My Voice Nation Help
10 comments
Martincomet
Martincomet

Well, I've been trying to post a comment on how this autocratic style of calcified city government is on display with the current Plummer Park controversy. An effort by the city to literally destroy a park that has been designated a State Historical Landmark in order to create underground parking for $41.3 Million against all community input. But for some reason my comments didn't get approved here. Anyone listening?

Guest
Guest

Love the column - totally agree. 

But "wallah?" Please.

This is WeHo, let's use the French! Voilà!

Martincomet
Martincomet

as reported on the laweekly blog: salaries in West Hollywood are out of control, the city manager has a higher salary than the mayor of LA (who doesn't even have a city manager on staff) or the governor of California. 

http://blogs.laweekly.com/info...

Martincomet
Martincomet

I agree that mail-in balloting would be a good start to revitalize the calcified political process in West Hollywood. The influence of developer campaign donations on long time incumbents is truly worrisome. The current $41.3 million plan that amounts to the de facto destruction of historic Plummer Park which residents are fighting tooth and nail (www.protectplummerpark.com) is an example of a misguided process that has woken up the electorate. Community input on the plan that will forever destroy 54 old growth trees and 2 historic buildings in order to build an underground parking structure in the park has so far been ignored.

Lola
Lola

Maybe it would have done Yaya some good to have attended a lecture...or two.I, personally loved the lectures as I loved Go Go appreciation day.That’s what I like about John D’Amico.  He can have fun, be an intellectual & care about the direction of the city and the world...all at the same time.Why, on earth, would he be trying to impress the Cal Arts group?He’s bringing them to us, Silly.

Some important things have already been accomplished because of theanti-despotic waters. There will much be more to come.I have no doubt.

Yes, the local smoking ban is a bad policy that will hurt business in Weho..It doesn’t stop smoking at bars...only restaurants. That’s typical of the John & Abbe tyrannical ruleBut,  I see democracy on the horizon.  

Democracy is generally defined as a form of government in which all adult citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. <http: en.wikipedia.org="" wiki=""></http:>

Rdawgone
Rdawgone

@font-face { font-family: "Times New Roman";}@font-face { font-family: "Calibri";}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Times; }p.MsoBodyText, li.MsoBodyText, div.MsoBodyText { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-align: justify; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Times; color: black; }p.Default, li.Default, div.Default { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; color: black; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }

JeffPrang has had a decision to make since the March election… how to use hisconsiderable power as the swing vote on the City Council. Forgingreasonable compromises on the “nanny” issues would have been a good start butthey seem to be the issues he cares about most.

 

Theinvisible hands of Land and Heilman and all the staff beholden to them areapparently still too heavy on Jeff’s shoulder for him to break away.

 

A casein point is the divisive outdoor smoking ban to be implemented on January1. It was so poorly written, it turns out to be more about discrimination thansmoking. Though City restaurants and residents havepleaded with him and he’s the swing vote, Jeff can’t break the hold of Heilmanand Land even to fix something blatantly, ridiculously wrong.

 

Here’s what he’s unwilling to change. Restaurants areallowed to set up “unenclosed congregation areas” where smokers can…congregate, separated from nonsmokers. The restaurants can serve the smokersbooze, but are not allowed to serve them food. And, statistically, the patronswho will be refused food service are those from LGBT and Russian communities.Removing nine words from the Ordinance would prevent discrimination against theCity’s majority population and its indispensable visitors and he’s moreconcerned about crossing Heilman and Land.

 

IfPrang is so blinded after the long years of tutelage under the Prince ofDarkness and his royal consort, that he can’t go against them on something likethat… I see little hope of him having the courage to support major issues thatwould really affect John and Abbe’s power… like firing some of their over-paidpuppet staff.

 

yaya
yaya

John D'Amico should stop playing bigshot and spending our tax payer money to inpress his elitist calArts friends with those stuffy lectures.

Guest
Guest

The fur ban indicates the utter disconnect between the residents and City Hall, including council. No one except hardcore animal rights activists wanted this fur ban, and yet it consumed months and months of energy and created huge tensions within the community. But, as John D'Amico has obviously learned, it's way easier to push through silly, expensive, sparsely attended events like "Go-Go-Boy Appreciation Day" (if the residents knew how much this cost the city in taxpayer money, they would revolt) and moralistic legislation that gives the city a rosy glow of progressiveness than it is to actually make substantive improvements that benefit the residents, including upgrading and expanding the number of rental units on the market. When was the last new apartment built in West Hollywood? The only new housing units in years have been expensive condos, some of which turned into very high-end rentals when the developers couldn't sell them. Who wants to live in a city of full of ugly, old, overpriced apartments? We have a city that is increasingly going to be populated by the rich who can afford it and the very poor who qualify for low-income housing and social services.

joninla
joninla

Almost ALL of the 'sounds good on paper' ideas which the City Council so carelessly decided to actually make actual pieces of legislation, have the same 5 Council Members Unanimously vote to approve THE CREATION OF A NEW LAW before a fully packed PRESS CONFERENCE .....-"Sound Good on Paper" but their combined lack of knowledge about BASIC HIGH SCHOOL CIVICS (let alone the one's with actual law degrees and licenses and of Course Law Professor John Heilman).  There is absolutely no authority granted by either the State of California or the Federal Government to allow 1 square mile City to just make up and pass laws that abridge existing, legal and Constitutionally permissible as a resident of our FREE COUNTRY.-IT 'LOOKS' ON PAPER, however, to not only be totally unenforceable, but by taking their actions but under and with full press attending their APPARENT AUTHORITY TO ENGAGE IN FORMAL LEGISLATION is such a serious violation of the fundamental provisions instructing what types of "Decisions" can be made at each level of Government, but The West Hollywood City Council has effectively declared they are usurping the GOVERNOR OF THE STATE in conjunction the State Legislature, who are the only bodies of State Government who can "GOVERN OUR LIVES" and like the Federal Government, neither one can so GOVERN US individually, but only BY EACH BRANCH PARTICIPATING ... "Checks and Balances" .... to ensure there are not power mongers who can collect enough power to change the laws.

THIS IS NO JOKE - THIS IS A SERIOUS QUESTION FOR FORMAL INVESTIGATION AND INQUIRY FOR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FOR WILLFULLY VIOLATING THE STATES GOVERNMENT CODE, ELECTION LAWS AND POSSIBLE RACKETEERING OR OTHER APPROPRIATE LAWS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES IF FOUND (AND/OR FOUND GUILTY OF COMMITTING IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL).

Their self-importance from a system (not an absent number of people voting) that was designed by Heilman to have this "council that rotates Mayoralship SO A MAJORITY VOTE WILL NEVER BE NEEDED, AND IT WILL BE CLOSE TO IMPOSSIBLE TO FOR ANYONE OUTSIDE THE EXISTING INCUMBENTS TO GET ELECTED.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city