L.A. City Council Approves $5 Increase in All Parking Tickets

Categories: Budget

la parking ticket laist.jpg
LAist
The red envelope gets fatter.
L.A. politicians are pleased to announce this afternoon that they avoided laying off any city employees in the 2012-13 city budget. (So union heads can put down their daggers, for now.)

But guess where they found $2.4 million of the emergency cash they needed to save their City Hall family?

Your overflowing parking-ticket fund, of course!

L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa originally suggested that four particular types of parking violations -- red-zone, street-sweeping, fire-hydrant and fire-lane -- cost an additional $10 each. That would have raised some fines as high as $100, a number that sent even apathetic Angelenos into a frenzy of activism.

But in a stroke of political genius, the Budget and Finance Committee saw a way to make this indirect taxation look a little less harsh, yet collect the same amount of money from residents.

Here's what they did at last week's meeting, according to the Los Angeles Times: They "replaced a proposed $10 hike in selected parking fines with an across-the-board $5 increase to dozens of other violations."

We called Councilman Paul Krekorian's office for a full list of violations that will now cost us $5 more.

His spokesman, Jeremy Oberstein, says that all Krekorian and his committee did was "lower the increase of that fee from $10 to $5." But he does acknowledge that the $5 increase will now be added onto more violations than the original four. He agrees to send us a full list. (We'll post it as soon as we get it.)

Do you understand what's happening here, Los Angeles? In order to balance a budget that they've singlehandedly botched into a state of disrepair, your elected officials are now asking you to pay even more for trying to get around this transit-challenged city in your car.

Yes, that may include oversleeping for 10 minutes while your car sits in the path of the street sweeper. (Even if the sweeper doesn't ever come.) Or parking a wee bit awkwardly because there aren't as many spaces in your neighborhood as there are people who live in it.

Back when the mayor pitched his $10 increase, L.A.'s Coalition for Economic Survival called it an "attempt to balance the City budget on the back of renters, the poor and workers."

And the same can be said of the $5 across-the-board version. Now, the fine will just be levied in smaller, less intimidating increments.

So the 20 percent of L.A. households living below poverty level -- and the 13 percent of L.A. residents without any job to speak of -- might want to stay mad, or whatever.

[@simone_electra / swilson@laweekly.com / @LAWeeklyNews]

My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Original Parking
Original Parking

This is not fair the raise in the parking has done because the government don't have enough fund to pay the union employees.

Andy Marcel
Andy Marcel

what George replied I'm amazed that anyone able to earn $5349 in one month on the internet. did you see this site

lazycash42.c()m

Eagle_Rock_Tom
Eagle_Rock_Tom

From 1912 on, the Automobile Club of Southern California kept asking/demanding that Los Angeles and other cities require off-street parking for businesses and residences in L.A., and other cities---and it didn't happen until 1977. Why? Because Proposition 13 changed the monetary equation.

Up until 1977, cities received property tax monies on structures that were built upon property. There was no tax money to be received in requiring off-street parking. In fact,  the more buildings built, the better! After Prop. 13, cities received most of their monies from sales taxes, which meant they needed to make things more commerce-friendly. All of a sudden, new commercial buildings had to have much more off-street parking, as, belatedly, did apartment buildings.

Now the city wants to collect more monies in parking tickets that are a result of its short-sighted development, from which the city has ALREADY received the extra monies that short-sightedness was designed to create. I think that is called "double-dipping."

The rest of us have to live with the consequences of our mistakes, even those which were unintended! Why should not the City of Los Angeles be required to do the same?

Confused by your idiocy
Confused by your idiocy

I don't understand your point at all. I'd hate to pay more money if I got a ticket (which, admittedly, would be my fault), but how would my councilperson be at fault? You said, "your elected officials are now asking you to pay even more for trying to get around this transit-challenged city in your car." How the fuck do you arrive at that? Are they taxing us for driving? Are they fining us for simply being in our cars? Or are you saying they should not ticket anyone cause there's not enough parking in this city and no one should get tickets? Did I miss something or are you just an idiot.

Simone Wilson
Simone Wilson

Almost everyone gets parking tickets. They're a part of life. This makes parking tickets an indirect taxation — one that's steadily rising without our consent or control. If the CHP charged $1,000 for speeding tickets, and caught you going 75 MPH, would you say, "Oh well, it's my fault"?

Confused by your idiocy
Confused by your idiocy

First of all, they are not a part of life. I tend to ride my bike and use the Metro instead of using my car. Secondly, there's a difference between added court costs from state, county and local fees and a $5 increase the city is adding to parking fines. Plus, there's a difference between speeding on the freeway and parking illegally within city limits in red zones, handicapped spaces, etc. (Though if I got ticketed for speeding, it would still be my fault!) Do I like the added fee? Hell no. But I also realize that it's nice to have bike lanes, libraries, parks and other things in LA - something that can't as easily be done without some fees. So I ask again, how is the council charging me more for getting around this city?

smashdivisions
smashdivisions

haha, you're seriously telling me that  this 5 dollar increase is specifically for bike lanes, parks, starving children, etc.? the city is going to be swamped in DEBT because of future pension obligations. trust me, it has nothing to do with maintaining bike lanes.

also, how much is too much for you to pay for a parking ticket? 80 dollars? 100 dollars? 200?

anonymous
anonymous

Keep feeding the union fat-cat employees---dumb LA residents.

Dave Anthony
Dave Anthony

Yep.  It's only about unions.  Your genius is needed.  Tell us more.

anonymous
anonymous

The parking hikes are to augment the city budget which in turn supports the over-paid union employees with cadillac pension and health benefits.  Each time the city is able to tax the residents the lay-off threat is minimized.

Anthony Dave
Anthony Dave

Unions are definitely hurting the economy now. They were needed once and I do see their historical value, but it's time for the Union Dinosaur to become extinct. They've grown too large and corrupt.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city