Top

blog

Stories

 

California Bullet Train to Nowhere Gets $6 Billion Via State Lawmakers

Categories: Transportation

california high speed train authority.JPG
California High-Speed Rail Authority
California's bullet train dreams have had a nightmare of a year, including lagging public support and a need for billions in a bad economy.

But supporters eked out a dreamy victory today:

The state Senate approved an $8 billion package to fund the first leg of the train (from nowhere to nowhere):


The first-leg will go 130 miles, from Madera to Bakersfield. The line is eventually expected to take you from L.A. to the Bay Area, but at a whopping cost of $120 each way.

The Assembly already passed the legislation, so the next step is the governor's desk.

President Obama and California Gov. Jerry Brown were big backers, arguing that the train would be a job-creator in a bad economy. That, however, is debatable, according to a recent UCLA study.

Brown said this today:

In 2008, California voters decided to create jobs and modernize our state's rail transportation system with a major investment in high-speed rail and key local projects in Northern and Southern California. The Legislature took bold action today that gets Californians back to work and puts California out in front once again.

The California High Speed-Rail Authority chair Dan Richard also sounded triumphant, stating:

Not only will California be the first state in the nation to build a high-speed rail system to connect our urban centers, we will also modernize and improve rail systems at the local and regional level. This plan will improve mobility for commuters and travelers alike, reduce emissions, and put thousands of people to work while enhancing our economic competitiveness.

But $8 billion for a state that perpetually billions in the hole? Much of the nearly $6 billion for the line will come from state bonds and federal funds. Another $2 billion was committed to local transportation projects.

City News Service broke down the rail cash:

The money includes $2.6 billion in rail bonds passed by California voters in 2008 and $3.2 billion in federal money ...

The whole high-speed rail combo plate is projected to eventually cost $100 billion. Maybe more.

Some folks aren't happy about it. The California Trucking Association VP Michael Shaw says the money in today's legislation would have been better spent on improving the Golden State's rough-riding roads:

Anyone who drives on a California road or highway knows that potholes, ruts, and gravel are far too common. The use of the critical funds that trucks pay to maintain and restore our roads for high-speed rail debt puts California commerce and drivers at greater risk.

SB 1029 would sell bonds that California's General Fund cannot afford to pay for a project that will not move a single passenger for a decade while tens of millions of Californians struggle to make their way to work and back home on crumbling roads. We need to increase our investment in our roads to keep what we have at a standard to keeps traffic and commerce flowing.

[Added at 5:36 p.m.]: This just in, from Teamsters Rail Conference director John Murphy, who's totally cool with this whole bullet-train thing because it will mean gigs for his union members:

It's a terrific day for the residents of California and the rail union members who will put their skills to use in building and operating trains on this high speed rail line. The legislators in Sacramento got it right when they voted to fund this project since it will help hundreds of people find good union jobs and the high speed rail line will provide a viable alternative to car and plane travel in the state.

[@dennisjromero / djromero@laweekly.com / @LAWeeklyNews]

My Voice Nation Help
14 comments
tadchem
tadchem

$8 billion for 130 miles is $61.5 million PER MILE. A 4-lane divided highway costs about $10 million per mile, and an 8-lane would cost twice that. Still a bargain, and the technology is well-proven.

It may save a few minutes over air travel, but there is no limit to the number of planes you can have running the same route at one time.  How many trains can you put on the track going both ways? Answer that and you can figure out how long you would have to wait for the next bullet train after you miss your connection - a whole day.

I'm sure there are hundreds of people who live in Madera who want to commute every day to/from Bakersfield, and vice versa ... NOT.

Greg Patterson
Greg Patterson like.author.displayName 1 Like

 The problem is it going no where.  From Bakersfield to Fresno to Merced to Stockton to Sacramento?  Who wants to go to any of those places except politicians and farm workers. Are they going to pay for it?  Bet the politicians get a free ride.  Most people only stop in those towns to get gas.   Most people want to go from San Fran to LA or San Diego.   At least parallel the 101 or the 5, but they want to go way out to the 99 adding over 100 extra miles which adds time. The point is speed. Adding more miles adds more time adding more cost.     The flight is only one hour.      What are were going to do?  Load up the bullet with tomatoes, peaches and cherries to get to market faster?   It is only about politicians self severing themselves at tax payers expense. It is all about Sacramento.    A monorail system like Disney world and land in Los Angeles and the Bay area going right down the middle of all the freeways and major roads going to multiple stations going to the out laying areas would be better spent money.  No need for tunnels and the roads are already bought.  Just add support posts down the middle.  Plenty of space. 

Jeffrey Tong
Jeffrey Tong like.author.displayName 1 Like

Californians!   Do you see the VISION of this project - you've got to have VISION (So the politicians and developers say)!  Well, all I see is BANKRUPTCY!

guest
guest

What this article dosn't say is that the truckers pay taxes in weight fees for the up-keep of California's freeways and roads.  This bill steals that money (approximately 360 million) and gives it to the High Spped Rail project.  So folks, forget about getting roads or bridges repaired, it's going towards HSR's "Brown Streak"

DAinLA
DAinLA

I want to frame this.  A comedy writer could not produce such satire.

DAinLA
DAinLA

This article is a bucketload of stupid.

BobD
BobD

 It isn't going to save any energy...no one is going to ride it. Here is the take of one of  your fellow  liberals that you may want to consider:      nytimes.com/2011/04/24/opinion/24white.html

BobD
BobD

 Railroads were cool...but then airplanes were invented.

BobD
BobD

 you must be very wealthy or  a renter that doesn't  know that your landlord will increase your rent to pay the increased taxes. If you were around in the '70s you would know how foolish your assertion is. Your grandmother would be living under the freeway on ramp without prop 13.

DAinLA
DAinLA

Amazingly stupid.

BobD
BobD

 Nobody has a clue as to what this monster is going to cost...it is all lies. You can only count  on it costing way more than you can imagine.  It is likely that all the money will go down the  rat hole and the project will never be complete or functional. All the legislators and Brown should be thrown out by the people. I know the people voted for this thing but they made a horrible mistake that they will  pay dearly for.

anonymous
anonymous

They can approve all the trains to nowhere they want.  Just vote NO on Jerry Brown's tax hike.  If he has money for this, we don't need to give him more.

Sonya
Sonya like.author.displayName 1 Like

This is going to be a colossal waste of time and money. 

Steve
Steve

Railroads helped build this Nation, and Railroads will help drive it into the future. People discredit the idea of High Speed Rail citing the costs. How much does it cost to build and maintain one mile of an 8 lane Freeway? How about 12 lanes? How does that compare to rail? I'm certain if we were take an objective look at it, rail would prove cheaper in every situation. We might also find that a "Freeway" could more accurately be called an "Expensiveway." The cost savings provided by Rail could be an integral part of bringing this state (possibly the nation) out of the red. The real question is do we support or assail this project based on Prejudice or facts?

From the Vault

 

General

Home

Fashion

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city