Top

blog

Stories

 

Richard Riordan Starts Signature-Gathering Campaign to Slash L.A. City Employee Pensions, Warning 100 percent of L.A.'s Cash Will Soon Be Consumed By Pensions, Fire and Police

mr-fix-it.3306986.40.jpeg
Kevin Scanlon
Richard Riordan
Long sounding the alarm for city employee pension reform, former L.A. Mayor Richard Riordan is no longer waiting for the City Council and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to come up with the big fix.

On Friday morning, Riordan will file papers with the City Clerk so he can start a signature-gathering campaign and ultimately place a pension reform initiative on the May 2013 ballot. The former mayor says that if voters approve the measure, the city will save "hundreds of millions of dollars" every year by 2017 and an upwards of a billion dollars by 2020.

In an exclusive interview with L.A. Weekly, Riordan explains that his dramatic move, which will pit his campaign against powerful city employee unions and City Hall politicians, is to "prevent the city of Los Angeles from going bankrupt, and preventing the closing of our parks and severe damages to services. In short, it's to stop us from becoming a third-world city."

Riordan calls his plan the "Fair Share Pension Reform Act of 2013." Friend and billionaire Eli Broad and attorney David Fleming are helping with the effort.

Riordan's plan will have current city employees contribute a "small and fair amount" to their pension benefits and will enroll new workers in a 401k system with a maximum 10 percent contribution from the city. It also promises to end employee "double-dipping."

Los Angeles City Council passed a small pension reform plan in September, which is expected to only save between $30 million and $70 million over a five-year period. City employee unions fought hard against that minor fix, so they'll undoubtedly wage war over Riordan's plan.

Los Angeles politicians also won't be thrilled that Riordan is now going over their heads and taking pension reform to voters. The former mayor, who brought City Charter reform to voters in the late 1990s, remains unapologetic.

"The politicians at City Hall have not taken this seriously," Riordan says. "They passed legislation that takes care of 1 percent of the problem."

Riordan says that if no major changes are made within the next five years, 100 percent of the city's budget will be dedicated to paying for pensions and police and fire services.

If that becomes the case, Riordan says, the quality of life for all Angelenos will be affected, especially the poor, who rely on various city services.

Critics have already said that Riordan as mayor made his own poor choices when dealing with city employee pension plans. He counters, "I wasn't a perfect mayor. But we're not talking about what I did yesterday or what the current politicians did yesterday. We're talking about today and the future of Los Angeles."

(Editor's note: Patrick Range McDonald co-wrote Richard Riordan's as-yet-to-be-published memoir.)

Contact Patrick Range McDonald at pmcdonald@laweekly.com.

My Voice Nation Help
13 comments
jasonarobertson
jasonarobertson

Fair share? EVERYONE should pay their fair share...including Richard Riordan, Owner of the Original Pantry Cafe. This cafe operates as many other Angeleno businesses do...they accept CASH ONLY! If you think these businesses are paying/claiming their fair share, then I've got a bridge to sell you.

MrHand
MrHand

Oh Please.

 

Tell me why a gas station mechanic, a legal secretary or a burger flipper ought to be paying higher sales or other taxes to support a city employee who barely works, can never be fired, and who retires at age 55 with a pension no one else has?

 

Union employees are sucking the City and County dry with ridiculous benefits and pensions no one else has. On top of that they can almost never be fired. if they screw up badly they go on "paid administrative leave" till things blow over.

 

One union contract provision requires the city to pay a penalty if the City lays off workers.  LADWP workers go to strip clubs when it rains.  Teachers cannot be fired and even the one accused of molesting kids recently was able to RESIGN rather than be fired (keeping his pension of course).

 

I won't even start on what county Union employees did to MLK Hospital--the feds had to close it because it was so bad! Anyone who has lived is LA and read news for 10 years or more knows all about our city and county unions.

 

Our roads are falling apart; our schools need to ask parents to bring in supplies. And upwards of 100% of the city's revenue will be soon needed just to pay pensions of employees who retire at age 55!  We are on the way to being Detroit if we don't bring this under control. The Unions won't do it: they think we work for them!

 

If this isn't stopped we know what the next step will be: the unions and their politicians will propose raising taxes again, driving more business out of the city. They'll raise ticket rates even higher. Close more libraries. Hire fewer cops. Borrow more money.  All so they can make more for doing less, and retire early while we all continue to work! How to pay it--hey thats going to be our problem! Look at Camden! At Detroit! That is where we're headed!!!

 

Thank god this Rirodon person is doing something about this. Most rich people have lost it--lost their loyalty to the City, to the ideal of public office and to common sense. Rich people don't want to be bothered  with problems. They tire easily, like parties and stay away from Los Angeles and its messy problems.  That old fighter still cares. Thank you Mr. Riordon.  

 

 

 

 

animalcaretech
animalcaretech like.author.displayName 1 Like

To hell with his plan and to hell with this biased article giving this millionaire free press. I work my butt off everyday for the the city I love and no one NO ONE has a right to change that. Not Riordan, Not the Koch Brothers... No one! I seriously hope that the LA residents and tax payers wake up and realize and appreciate what I and my co-workers do so well and so efficiently. I hope they also understand that the rising tide lifts ALL ships in the private sector. This is a time when we should be applauding the hard work they do... not shunning them for the hard earned benefits they get (which aren't much as is) and which they've paid for, continue to pay for... AND DESERVE!

fairshareadvocate
fairshareadvocate

Riordan, Broad and Fleming might have a little more credibility if they indicated support for Proposition 30 so they could pay their fair share in taxes.    Seems these guys are always vocal in seeking tax subsidies for themselves while asking everyone else to pony up. Credibility on municipal fiscal issues is not their strong point.

abramsrl
abramsrl like.author.displayName 1 Like

Myopia rules! 

LA is already sinking to the level of a city in a third world nation, especially if you count corruption.  Who was it that laid the foundation to turn Los Angeles into a Temple to Crimogenics?  Riordan.  The 1993 L.A. Telecommuting study advised that with a proper telecommuting program, using 1992 technology, LA could reduced traffic by 30% and the next for new high rises by 30%. Riordan is the one who reduced civil service and made department heads beholden to crooked mayors so all the departments are run for the care and feeding of billionaires.

 

Rather than heed the sound advice that density will harm the city and to institute the most modern telecommuting (which has now become TelePresence), Riordan planned for more and more density which meant about $ 2 BILLION more tax payer dollars to his buddies and the City's decline. Then, there are the billions squandered on needless subways. 

 

While there are decline factors beyond the city's control, a major factor across the nation in degrading urban centers was Density.  Riordan pushed for more and more density -- more subways and more CRA projects and bled the public treasury to give the city's life blood to developer cronies.  After he left, Hahn and then Villababosa and Garcetti raised corruption to an art form, capitalizing on the "charter reforms" imposed by Riordan.

 

Angelenos, being a very poorly educated lot, will no doubt vote to deprive cops, firemen, paramedics, and all other city employees of every cent that they can.  The result will be an exodus of the more qualified.  What people ignore is that while the power structure has been completely criminalized, the line workers in Los Angeles are good. Sure, being a world class liar may be the most important qualification to work for a councilmember, but the cops, firemen, paramedics, street workers, clerks at the counter are vastly better than the big wigs.  Destroy the compensation and benefit structure and we will have criminals at the top and fools at the bottom.

 

 

 

AD_RtR_OS
AD_RtR_OS

Why shouldn't the TAXPAYERS vote on your pay and benefits "jason", they're your employer?

Or, have you forgotten that in this Republic, government answers to the citizen, not vice-versa?

911jason
911jason

 @AD_RtR_OS For exactly the reason I wrote. Did you actually read my post?

911jason
911jason

I understand the vast majority of LA residents will vote for this and it will probably pass. But how is this fair to people who have already worked 10, 15, 20, even 30 years towards a retirement they have been promised? We have already taken several cuts to our paychecks, to our benefits, been forced to take furloughs, pay additional amounts for the healthcare of other people who have already retired and more. Put yourself in an LA city employee's shoes, how would you like to let the public vote on YOUR retirement plan and benefits? To think of it another way, maybe all employers should just start letting their customers vote on the benefits and retirement packages of their employees. Who thinks the customers will vote fairly on behalf of the employees? Of course they won't, they want lower prices so they'll vote to cut every time. What's the difference?

abramsrl
abramsrl

 @911jason  Even in the 1970's when Hollywood was in deep deterioration due to years of city hall, post WW II corruption which had decimated the R-1 neighborhoods in the Flats, there was an air of hope.  In the 1970's the City did take steps to reverse the decline by enforcing low density zoning, and Hollywood came back to life. The influx of Armenian families was crucial to our revival as they rehabbed many of the homes, but others also reinvigorated Hollywood's R-1 neighborhoods.  Abandoned homes all through the Hill were restored and property values increased and crime decreased.

 

Now that Villababosa, LaBonge and Garcetti have turned City Hall into Crime Central, Hollywood is headed back towards a slum.  Just watch the news.  Almost every night, there is a shooting:  Hollywood & Vine, Hollywood & Sunset, Cahuenga at Yuuca, along Franklin Avenue, a severed head in Bronson Canyon, people shot in restaurants, but Chamber of Commerce lies and declares there is no crime in Hollywood.  Rapes, muggings and murders do not count as crimes.

 

When one walks the R-1 Streets of Hollywood, one can see the impact of the violent crime which Villababosa, Labonge and Garcetti have brought to Hollywood.  Where there used to be blocks and blocks of craftsmen homes with no front yard fences, now we have streets filled with 10 to 20 foot tall crime fences backed up with bamboo, thorny bushes, electronic gates, and cameras. Every day new security fences are being erected.  People who feel safe do not live in armed fortresses.

 

Riordan touched over more than $2 Billion theft in public funds to go to his developer buddies and he hastened the deterioration of Hollywood, and his successors have perpetuated his ill-begotten policies. 

 

Now Riordan wants to turn on some of his victims and blame the city workers.  What is their crime, other than not being multi-millionaires or billionaires?  Expecting the City to honor their contracts. That's it.  They merely want what they were promised.

 

When Riordan started his fraud on public workers, he had to know for a fact the City could never keep its promises.  Did Riordan or his successors even try to make the contributions to the pension plans? 

 

But they had billions of tax payer dollars to give to Eli Broad, CIM Group, Larry Bond, and a host of other real estate developers.

 

How about asking Eli to cough up $52 M as his share?  Oh No we could do that.  It's better to steal a pension from a fireman.

 

Steve York
Steve York

Jesus. I wondered where that old far was all these years...he's 82 now! [I wasn't a perfect mayor. But we're not talking about what I did yesterday or what the current politicians did yesterday.]

Kata Kimbe
Kata Kimbe

Love him. That was the time when this City was run somewhat functionally.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city