Porn Industry, Steven Hirsch, Kayden Kross, File Suit Against Mandatory Condoms In L.A.

Categories: Porn

@Kayden_Kross kayden kross.JPG
@KaydenKross
As we predicted, freedom of speech is shaping up to be a key issue in the porn industry's fight against mandatory condom use on-set in Los Angeles County.

Smut business titans including Steven Hirsch, chief of Vivid Entertainment, announced that they have filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Los Angeles that says the law, approved by county voters in November, violates porn's freedom of expression.

The AIDS Healthcare Foundation this afternoon begged to differ:


The organization, which spearheaded the effort to get the mandatory condom measure on the ballot (it passed 57 to 43 percent), predicts that the industry will lose this fight.

Tom Myers, general counsel for the foundation says this in a statement sent to the Weekly and other outlets:

Despite what the adult industry's lawyers are claiming in this lawsuit, Measure B is not directed at speech, and as such, their First Amendment claims will likely ring hollow with the court. Measure B is about safety in a commercial endeavor. Nothing in Measure B restricts the content of what can be shown ... The same reason one requires condoms is the same reason a stunt man or woman would have to use a net, or be tied to a harness.

The suit names Hirsch and performers Kayden Kross and Logan Pierce and plaintiffs. Defendants include the County of Los Angeles, county health director Jonathan Fielding, and District Attorney Jackie Lacey.

kayden cross wide clubkayden com.JPG
clubkayden.com

According to a statement from the industry lobbying group, the Free Speech Coalition, the measure's rules ...

... place an intolerable restriction on freedom of expression. The lawsuit also challenges the County's jurisdiction to regulate adult production on performer health and safety.

Some in the business have also questioned whether such a law is constitutional in situations, for example, where a husband and wife want to have sex on camera without a condom: Can the people enforce birth control?

Hirsch of Vivid says:

The new law makes no sense and it imposes a government licensing regime on making films that are protected by the Constitution. Measure B will have vast unintended consequences which may undermine industry efforts to protect the health of our actors and actresses.

He says the industry's monthly testing protocol (some performers get tested every other week) works and has kept the business safe from HIV, though there have been scares, both in 2004 and again in 2011. Leaders in the business argue that none of those performers who ended up with HIV got it on-set.

The business has argued that customers won't buy condom porn and that enforcement of the law will force production to leave town.

AIDS Healthcare Foundation president Michael Weinstein:

Unfortunately, the industry has tried everything so far except exploring how they might actually comply with the law.

[@dennisjromero / djromero@laweekly.com / @LAWeeklyNews]


My Voice Nation Help
21 comments
Andrew Silluron
Andrew Silluron

The analogies in the blog post to any stuntmen is just plain bogus. Forcing all porn actors to wear condoms is like forcing all car chases to remain under the speed limit. You cannot equate or compare a clear, present and mortal danger that threatens to swallow up innocent bystanders (such as a car stunt) to a danger that is clearly weighed and accepted by consenting adults.

Curtis DeMartini
Curtis DeMartini

should be overturned ...perhaps regulate testing and strict rules for any carriers ...but forcing condoms - which are certainly not full-proof ...is counter-intuitive ..

Jane C. Arge
Jane C. Arge

Why should i care what porn actors do for hygiene? A percentage will contract one thing or another... their choice, their issue.

Bryan Kim
Bryan Kim

just film in ventura or pasadena

Tammy Ryan
Tammy Ryan

As long as there are no unions to protect the health and welfare of these actors, it will be left to the state.

Erik R. Winston
Erik R. Winston

Why not? Lawyers' mistresses & drug dealers shouldn't have to suffer because the County wants to stop porn stars from going raw dog.

Jerry Hernandez
Jerry Hernandez

Poor girls'll have to taste latex and themselves now.

Naren Renz
Naren Renz

its just more pointless bureacracy.

Celia Soudry
Celia Soudry

even condoms can't protect against everything. so it's their risk, their choice.

Pat Walsh
Pat Walsh

Yes. The city is driving out business to other cities with it's over regulation, and loosing revenue. Now they want more tax money from property owners to fix the pot holes. SMH

Will Gara
Will Gara

Do they ever make porn musicals?

Randy Focazio
Randy Focazio

we all love porn without em but the thing is they fuck people outside the set afterward and spread an epidemic ..so no I don't. Its basic health issues.

Malicio Leos
Malicio Leos

where's the money shot? ...Its In the bag!

rskillsta
rskillsta like.author.displayName 1 Like

Another do-gooder law that morons voting didn't put any thought into and creates huge unnecessary police state bureaucracy for rubber wrapping thousands of penises like sausage meat.  Do you have to put condoms on dildos for lesbian porn with this silly-ass law, too?  2012 marked the year of conservatives and conservative acting Democrats declaring war on vaginas and penises.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city