Top

blog

Stories

 

Will Mayoral Candidate Wendy Greuel Turn Back Clock on Slum Housing Prevention?

greuel new hair.JPG
Read more about Wendy Greuel's housing record: "Rent Activists Hit Greuel and Garcetti."

Update, 1:05 p.m.: City Controller Wendy Greuel's office releases a statement, after the jump.

Los Angeles City Controller Wendy Greuel, who's running for mayor, is stirring up outrage with a recommendation that could return L.A. to a time when slum housing conditions went largely unchecked by the city.

Greuel wants to move housing code enforcement away from the Housing Department and to the troubled Department of Building and Safety -- even though her own audit shows numerous problems with DBS.

"It would be a disastrous thing to follow through on," says tenants' rights activist Larry Gross, who promises that other activists will strongly oppose and fight the recommendation.

The L.A. City Council has yet to vote on Greuel's suggestion, with the L.A. City Administrative Officer currently developing a report on it. Mayoral hopefuls Eric Garcetti and Jan Perry, who both sit on the City Council, have yet to voice any loud opposition to Greuel's plan.

Last year, on October 3, 2012, Greuel had released a damning audit of the Department of Building and Safety, which had been rocked by major scandals of employees taking bribes. Greuel found that the ailing agency needed to "streamline the processes of permit issuance, respond to code violations, and improve administrative functions."

In other words, DBS needed a sweeping and major overhaul to do basic work.

Greuel noted that DBS "does not always conduct required follow up inspections to determine whether cited safety or building code violations have been corrected." The city controller also found that DBS "appears to be over-billing some customers [and] others appear to have been undercharged."

Greuel, however, came up with the idea that housing code enforcement that's been conducted by the Housing Department, where activist Larry Gross says things have been working fine, should be transferred to problem-plagued DBS.

In a November 29, 2012, report, Greuel justifies the move as a way to "improve intra-department communication and service delivery, management oversight, customer service, and ultimately in cost savings processes."

So apparently Greuel's recommendation is "ultimately" based on meeting the bottom line.

Gross is so beside himself with shock and horror he can barely contain himself.

Greuel's recommendation will "jeopardize people having safe and sanitary conditions to live in in all of Los Angeles," says Gross, longtime executive director of Coalition for Economic Survival.

Greuel also apparently doesn't know her city history.

In 1997, the city created a Blue Ribbon Citizens' Committee on Slum Housing, which found that the Department of Building and Safety was dropping the ball on stopping slum housing conditions in L.A. -- its inspection program was a certified mess.

In response, the blue ribbon panel recommended that the Housing Department take over housing code enforcement, which was approved by the City Council and Mayor Richard Riordan. Now Greuel wants to change that.

"For no reason whatsoever," says Gross, "the controller is suggesting we go back in time when the city wasn't enforcing housing code violations."

Greuel's office did not respond to queries before press time.

Gross says, "We've been there and we've done that and it doesn't work. We would oppose [Greuel's recommendation] vigorously."

The ball is now in the court of L.A. City Council President Herb Wesson and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa -- as well as council members Eric Garcetti and Jan Perry. So far, they have shown signs of going along with Greuel's idea, which had been quietly working its way through the system.

Update: Greuel's office gives L.A. Weekly this statement today:

"Wendy is committed to protecting taxpayers, and she's advocated for safer housing and smart enforcement of safety codes.

"Wendy is also deeply concerned with tenants' rights issues and has performed audits of the Housing Department, Housing Authority and Building and Safety to make sure they are working efficiently and effectively.

"Wendy's most recent audit of Building and Safety recommends placing the program that enforces safety codes within that department to make the program more transparent and streamlined, and to save taxpayer money. And, if consolidation occurs, she will ensure that the department works with all groups, including tenant advocacy groups, to ensure we have the most effective code enforcement programs."

Read more about Wendy Greuel's housing record: "Rent Activists Hit Greuel and Garcetti."

Contact Patrick Range McDonald at pmcdonald@laweekly.com.

My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
fongoolioso
fongoolioso

That was a really weak response from her camp. We can never get anything but rhetoric from people running for office. Sad!

patrick.range.mcdonald
patrick.range.mcdonald

Thanks for all the feedback. All very interesting stuff. I gave Greuel's camp plenty of time to get back to me, with a deadline. They missed the deadline, so I moved forward with the post. It's clear that I did not rely solely on Larry Gross's view on things. Various documents were quoted, etc. The change Greuel proposes could easily be a boon for landlords, who know Building and Safety has an incredibly shoddy record, among other problems, for follow up inspections, as Greuel's report notes. I am always interested to hear about problems at the Housing Department or other city agencies. Take care, Patrick Range McDonald, LA Weekly 

adambray
adambray

Claiming that moving inspections from one department to another means a "boon for landlords" shows a lack of awareness of what we are talking about here.

The City of Los Angeles via the LAHD has developed a unique inspection system for code enforcement and habitability inspections.   As time has gone by the restrictions on rental property owners rights have become larger and now the LAHD and LADBS are allowed to require repairs done in certain ways and SHOULD work together towards their common goals of raising revenue to support their departments and ensuring good quality housing with safe living conditions.   Regardless of who is doing the inspections it seems clear that the political leaders of the city will not reduce the level of inspections so it really comes down to deciding if we need THREE departments to handle these inspections and oversight for housing in Los Angeles.  Currently we have the Housing Authority, the Housing Department and Department of Building and Safety all performing inspections on residential properties.  

They all run similar inspections and it probably makes sense in a financial spreadsheet to consolidate these duties but without details of what Wendy Gruel is proposing it is simply impossible to know based on your article. 

Your claim that the DBS doesn't follow up on inspections is simply not true on a larger scale.   Have you ever opened and closed a building permit in the city?   There are examples of bad apples in the LADBS and LAHD and HACLA.  

patrick.range.mcdonald
patrick.range.mcdonald

@adambray Adam, it's not a claim that I made about follow up inspections. It was specifically stated in Greuel's report. Adam, please read the article more carefully. You're turning everything up and around and upside down to fit your arguments, and you're ignoring simple facts that were included in the post. This issue has clearly struck a nerve with you, and I wonder exactly who you are and who you are doing your bidding for. Good luck to you, Patrick Range McDonald, LA Weekly

monique.bryher
monique.bryher

LA City Housing is not working "just fine" - it is as corrupt as LADBS. Many mom-and-pop small apartment owners have been harrassed by LAHD inspectors and its pro-tenant, anti-landlord policies. There have been many documented instances of tenants who know how to play the game of damaging their units in order to get LAHD to force the landlord in REAP (which really should be called RAPE) so that the tenant gets to pay reduced or no rent. As soon as the landlord repairs what the renter damaged, the renter re-damages, etc. And if Gross and other are worried about slum apartments, what do they think happens when a landlord is unable to repair his units because the LAHD is impounding and fining him into insolvency? The City, by the way, has a pretty strong record of being a slumlord itself - take a look at public housing and ask yourself if you would want to live there.

thephxrising1
thephxrising1

Wendy Greuel is a skum onto herself. During het tenure as comptroller she rarely did a thing that wasn't politically motivated in an attempt to position herself for a mayoral run. She reminds me of New York's governor Cuomo (sp?) who operates on the same piggish frequency.

And Garcetti is just as slimy -- just in different ways.

adambray
adambray

Patrick.  Your post is poor reporting because it didn't wait for a response and didn't include comments from anyone other than Larry.   

Maybe you can point out the link to this report prepared by the CES with public funds that explains their position and reasons they think the lahd scep system is superior. http://healthyhomescollaborative.org/Portals/0/HHEAT%20Policy%20Report2009.pdf

The main points in that study really come down to better integration of the many players trying to improve housing for the poor in our city.  All of the examples of tenants and photos in the report from the CES appear to be in lower income housing that also suffer from over-crowding due to housing affordability.    Of course, at some point there are true costs for housing in Los Angeles and there is rarely an article that points out that the vast majority of housing is provided by for profit providers and that people paying the lowest rental rates are more likely to get poor quality housing.  It costs real dollars to do good work.  

I hope you follow up with a proper response from the controller with her reasons and allow other people to comment.   The city collects a huge amount of money from this system and it deserves to be allocated as efficiently as possible.   

adambray
adambray

The only person you interviewed for this post was Larry Gross who, as you put it, is so beside himself with shock and horror he can barely contain himself.  These are the same people that pushed for a no-rent increase plan last year in a city. 

The LAHD and LADBS both have broken systems in place.   How about the LAHD inspectors demanding sex from property owners for help with clearing violations?  

Perhaps putting some insight into why Wendy thinks that this will be a more cost effective or superior system as opposed to simply working as a PR machine for Larry Gross is a better way to go.  All we know now is that he doesn't like it because LA DBS has bad employees. 

patrick.range.mcdonald
patrick.range.mcdonald like.author.displayName 1 Like

@adambray Hi Adam Bray, I reached out to Greuel, and she did not respond until just now. Greuel's audit says nothing about LAHD having a problematic inspection program, and in her recent statement to the Weekly, she doesn't mention such a problem either. If there was one, I'm sure she would have used that as a reason for the so-called streamlining. I explained her reasoning in this piece -- she wants to cut costs. All the other facts are there too. Greuel's recommendation is clearly troubling. Take care, Patrick Range McDonald, LA Weekly

adambray
adambray

@patrick.range.mcdonald @adambray

Not sure what happened but I typed out a reply to your points above.

- As of now, the only thing we know is that the CES, which is a professionally run and powerful tenants right's organization that has done many good deeds, opposes it because they think the LA DBS has bad employees.  

As an observer of the massive bueracracy in the city of Los Angeles and a residential property manager in the city I know that there are nuanced arguments for all sides of this discussion but your reporting is not any type of reporting of facts.   It's a simple copy and paste of the PR releases of one organization with a vested interest in the LAHD because they receive funding from that department.    There are numerous examples of bad employees in every department of the city and that is not a reason NOT to look for inefficiencies to improve on and better management principles to follow.   


Larry knows the history of rent control as well as anyone in the city but his 'horror' at a proposal to find a way to streamline city costs in the face of massive budget shortfalls is impossible to understand.  Is it more horrific to imagine the entire system falling apart for lack of funds in a few years?   Or perhaps more horrific that the LAHD is trying to increase the costs of these inspections and charges 200% late charges on the $70 yearly fee per unit that landlords pay?  


You might also want to research and discuss the source of funding for these inspections.   Are you aware that landlords are allowed to pass the cost of these inspection programs to tenants and that tenants are paying about $120 for each inspection they receive (3 per month and inspections are roughly once every 3 years)?

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city