Top

blog

Stories

 

Eric Garcetti Flip-flops to Support Parent Trigger School Reform After Media Pressure

Categories: Election 2013

doomscraper-here-comes-hollywood-s-first-ever-megascraper.2126112.40.jpg
Gregory Bojorquez
Eric Garcetti
Los Angeles mayoral candidate Eric Garcetti flip-flopped days before the March 5 primary election, embracing Parent Trigger, the dramatic law now spreading nationwide that lets disgusted parents take over bad schools through petition.

On February 15, when L.A. Weekly pressed the five top mayoral candidates for their positions on Parent Trigger, Wendy Greuel, Jan Perry, Kevin James and Emanuel Pleitez backed it. Garcetti, who is getting campaign help from UTLA, the powerful teachers union that hates Parent Trigger, said he wasn't ready to back the law. Apparently, he's evolved.

Garcetti changed his mind at an education summit sponsored by United Way of Greater Los Angeles, after L.A. Times columnist Jim Newton further pushed Garcetti on his position on the law.

Most teachers unions see the Parent Trigger law as a threat to their power because it lets parents take charge of disastrous public schools if they can get enough signatures from enough fed-up parents at a given school.

But it's clear that parents want more power over anti-reform unions and school boards.

Education reformers are now pleased as punch about Garcetti's change of mind, although some folks are skeptical about Garcetti's eleventh-hour change of heart, L.A. School Report explains.

Parent Revolution executive director Ben Austin, a guiding force behind the Parent Trigger, sent out a press release trumpeting the fact that "all the candidates for mayor of Los Angeles have now publicly stated their support for 'Parent Trigger' and its use by parents in failing schools."

Austin noted that, "This is an idea that didn't exist during the last mayoral election, and just a few years ago was considered too radical for mainstream politicians to embrace. Now it's radical not to endorse the simple idea that parents should have power over the educational destiny of their own children."

The first Los Angeles parents to tap their new powers under the Parent Trigger law did so at the badly failing 24th Street Elementary School in West Adams. Those parents are now moving ahead, after L.A. Unified officials chose to back the parents rather than fight them.

Check out the award-winning L.A. Weekly cover story "California's Parent Trigger."

Contact Patrick Range McDonald at pmcdonald@laweekly.com.

My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
abramsrl
abramsrl topcommenter

Ideas determine actions.  If the people who trigger the new school have sound ideas, they should end up providing a better education.  If they have bad ideas, they will provide a bad education.

When the parents prove that a particular school has failed, then the ideas running that school are bad ideas.  The new school may have good or bad ideas, but what's wrong stopping a school which is a proven failure and allowing someone else to try?

Here's a bad idea -- trusting anything Garcetti says. I hope the new schools teach people to think so that Angelenos can elect better leaders. 


WHITELADY99
WHITELADY99 like.author.displayName 1 Like

NO PARENT TRIGGER WILL EVER WORK UNLESS THERE ARE SUFFICIENT MIDDLE CLASS WHITE LADIES LIKE MAGGIE GYLLENHAAL TO ENFORCE THEM

From the Vault

 

General

Music

Loading...