Top

blog

Stories

 

L.A., California Streets Crumbling, Will Need Billions To Fix, Report Says

Categories: Transportation

Thumbnail image for pothole-art.png
mypotholes.com
If you think our streets are crumbling before our very eyes, you're not alone.

The latest California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment by the League of California Cities shows that our roads are in "rapid decline" and that our budget to fix them is perhaps even worse.

The assessment says that unless we come up with the cash to fix our streets ...


... one out of four of the roads across California will be in "failed" condition within 10 years.

The assessment says it we're under-funding our street maintenance and repair by more than $82 billion but that such an investment would protect $189 billion worth of taxpayer dollars underlying our roadway infrastructure.

In other words, as League of California Cities executive director Chris McKenzie put it:

It costs far less to repair and maintain roads than to replace them. State and local governments, the Legislature, and the people of California have a choice. We can either spend money now and make the repairs, or expect to pay a lot more in the future.

If you read LA Weekly you already know that Los Angeles continually ranks as one of the very top cities with the worst roads in the nation, a distinction that used to belong to East Coast towns like Philadelphia and Washington, D.C.

The cost of saving L.A.'s roads will by far cost more than rescuing streets in any other California county: $12.5 billion over 10 years, according to the assessment.

california roads assessment.JPG

L.A. county roads remain "at risk," as they have since 2008, the study says.

Matt Cate, executive director of the California State Association of Counties:

Unless this crisis is addressed, costs to maintain the local system will only continue to grow, while the safety, quality and reliability of California's local transportation network worsens. California needs economic growth and jobs right now, and restoring our deteriorating transportation infrastructure will foster both.

My Voice Nation Help
32 comments
Insurin
Insurin

Over the next few years our roads are going to deteriorate at a faster rate do to the extreme weather we have been witness to. We can correct this by building roads with better materials, we can generate the funds by holding more local events and using the parking dollars / tax dollars to update. We have many choices.

Insurin Insurance

(623) 252-4010

http://www.insurin.us

Only the best insurance will do!

louispfreely
louispfreely

Gotta pay bloated pensions are benefits though for public employees.  We have our priorities straight here.

briansays
briansays

any taxes will have to go to fund the unfunded pension liabilities created over the years first so if you increase taxes the legislature will loot the current budget general fund for that first

abramsrl
abramsrl like.author.displayName 1 Like

Thank you very much for providing a direct link to the study.  That thoughtfulness is too often over looked.  Providing access to the hard data right inside the article itself greatly enhances the journalistic credibility of the publication, the author and his article.  Readers are able to verify the accuracy of the article for themselves.

Thanks again

andreihp42
andreihp42 topcommenter

how bout cracking down on the unions that do the work? how often do you see guys just standing around while one guy works? get some oversight there and we'll see how fast things get fixed

Steven Mcguire
Steven Mcguire

California is now a "super majority". Not 1 Republican vote is needed for anything.

abramsrl
abramsrl

@Steven Mcguire   LA could have had a GOP mayor -- but the GOP starved his campaign when he need the cash most -- early on.  Why?  Because he was GAY and they did not want to upset the Tea Party jerks like Rubio by having Kevin James become Mayor of Los Angeles.

The LA TIMES spent more time and money distorting James' position and telling everyone he was GAY and GOP than the regular GOP spend to elect him.  I'm a Dem but I gave him money early on.  Finally when it was too late, two Texas Non-Tea Baggers gave hundreds of thousands but by then it was way too late.

Johnny O's
Johnny O's like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

5 times as many people are using the state's infrastructure as are paying into it........enforce immigration laws and watch everything else get better.

abramsrl
abramsrl like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Johnny O's  Like most bigots, Johnny O's, facts are not your longest and strongest suit.

erikkengaard
erikkengaard

@abramsrl- Johnny makes an excellent point. The California Legislative Analysts' office confirms that California has a disproportionate number of immigrants living below poverty level. LA County Supervisor Michael Antonovich has expressed concern, in print, over the burden of immigrants.

suzie
suzie

@abramsrl according to you..every thing and everyone is on the verg of absurd except you!

Now that is just absurd!

abramsrl
abramsrl

@erikkengaard @abramsrl  You have verged into the absurd.  Over-populated?  Who is over populated?  America? California? Los Angeles? Hollywood which lsot 26,198 people between 2005 and 2010 (Garcetti's Hywd Com Plan, FEIR p 3.1)

"Controlling the borders" is a buzz word with no real meaning.  The undocumented workers who come to the USA thru uncontrolled border are good for us.  The criminals associated with the drug trade are bad for us, but we are the ones who made the drug trade into a multi-billion industry controlled by criminals.  Like the dumb Sequester, Congress created this problem and it could end this problem tomorrow by legalizing and regulating the drug trade.

abramsrl
abramsrl

@erikkengaard  Gee whiz, that sure sounds like bigotry or is it just old fashion greed or is it ignorance.  The policies which you promote do not bring prosperity.  The South could never understand why it continued to be poor while other parts of the country were zooming ahead.  They wanted to preserve benefits for themselves and THEIR families.

abramsrl
abramsrl

@erikkengaard @abramsrl All businessmen want to keep down costs while charging more for their products  There is no reason it should be different for labor.  Lowest initial costs as opposed to lowest overall cost, however, can be a myopic strategy.

Your comment about density and the cost of homes seems to be searching for some point, but it is not clear what point you want to make.  Are you complaining that workers' real wages have not risen as much in the last 30 and 40 years as housing prices?  If so, the problem is not the cost of a home, but the transfer of wealth to 1%.

One way wealth is transferred from the middle class and even the upper middle class is via Transit Oriented Districts [TOD's].  Crowding "growth" to these small areas makes certain that growth is directed onto a few parcels of land which is owned by the 1% who then get the city to create community plans creating TOD's.  Then, the city declares the need for subways to handle the density and naturally another mega-wealthy developer is there to construct a subway.  Then, the city discovers that the subway has operating costs way beyond its fares and requires public subsidies and then the call goes out for more TOD's which then results in calls for more subways.  It is an endless cycle of fraud.

Without TOD's like Bunker Hill, Century City and Hollywood, business would be spread through the entire city and middle class and upper class land owners would find their properties worth more, but the 1% would find their TOD's worth a lot less.


erikkengaard
erikkengaard

@ abramsrl - and its not about bigotry, its about self (as in selfish) interest, preserving benefits for ourselves and OUR posterity.

erikkengaard
erikkengaard

@abramsrl  What does the GOP have to do with the essential issue - we are overpopulated. And who said the undocumented were at fault? We are at fault for not controlling our borders, allowing in those who will make major contributions, and excluding all others. 

erikkengaard
erikkengaard

@ abramsrl - this isn't about undocumented aliens. It's about immigration and population density.

erikkengaard
erikkengaard

@abramsrl - American business wants cheap labor. As for elementary economics, it, and our experience, tell us that when the population density exceeds a certain point, the cost of land for comfortable residences is priced beyond the reach of the middle class. Do you doubt that houses in Mill Valley, CA, once affordable, are now beyond reach of the middle class? Come on, I watched it happen!

abramsrl
abramsrl

@erikkengaard @abramsrl Johnny's point, however, is not well taken.  One does not look solely at a "cost" without looking at the "benefit."  Under Johnny's view, people should not shop at Ralphs because before they leave the store, Ralphs gives them a bill to pay. Such complainers would ignore the fact that they are taking home a lot of food and other necessities for life.

 Studies have shown for decades that the undocumented workers add far more to the economy than they subtract.  To an extent, undocumented workers add to the population density and density contributes to most of L.A. problems.  One needs to take an overall view and when we do elementary economics tells us that we are far better off with undocumented workers than without them.

Since undocumented workers are like the Sequester, a dumb idea which Congress could end tomorrow, the fault for the situation rests with American law makers and not the undocumented workers.

It is interesting that so many GOP'ers are anti-undocumented workers,while they vigorously complain about any government regulation which interferes with the free market.  People come to America to work because American businesses pay them to come and American businessmen pay the undocumented to come to the USA because it is good for their businesses' profitability.

Angel Ciudad
Angel Ciudad like.author.displayName 1 Like

What about the millions it costs us to fix our cars that get fucked up everyday on these shitty roads!? Build the rails out from Santa Monica to Inland empire and build bullet trains from San Diego to Seattle, create solar panel farms along the way to help curb electricity costs and stop asking questions you already know the answers to. Unless all this redundancy is just for show and big oil still won't set us free from their back door deals to kill all these huge projects that are so desperately needed.

abramsrl
abramsrl

@Angel Ciudad  Pense en lo.  How will spending billions of fixed rail transportation dollars fix pot hole on Wilton?

Sia Abderezai
Sia Abderezai

YOU KNOW, TO ARREST POTHOLES! AND BRING THEM TO JUSTICE! CAPSLOCAPSLOCK!

Star Foreman
Star Foreman

or we could make the bullet train

abramsrl
abramsrl

@Star Foreman Yes, we can take the bullet train from Santa Monica to West Hollywood

Doug Osborne
Doug Osborne

Or we could vote for a very small tax increase to pay pennies on the dollar today to fix these things...oh I give up.

abramsrl
abramsrl

@Doug Osborne   We have already paid for these things.  I am in favor of taxation but I oppose corruption.  The reason our prior tax dollars did not go into roads, sidewalks, police, fire and paramedics is that Garcetti, Greuel, Zine, Wesson etc. gave our tax dollars to their developer friends.  The corrupt CRA Hollywood-Highland Project lost $424 Million and then Garcetti gave the developer an aditional $30 Million.  $42 Million went to CIM Midtown in Wesson's district.  52 Million went to Eli Broad, $67 Million went to a downtown hotel, etc.  In the last 12 years, over $1.5 BILLION tax dollars were diverted away from police, fire, paramedics, libraries, parks, roads, .... BTW, none of the CRA projects like Bunker Hill paid one cent in incremental property taxes.  Once again the 1% pay zero taxes while the rest of us pay, and pay and pay.  Wesson even gave CIM Midtown 100% of any future sales taxes from the project.

Yes, take the time to add up the billions which have been funneled to developers and away from the general fund and you will see why Prop A was another scam.  The money raised by Prop A would similarly have found its way into the developers' pockets.  Garcetti and the others are desperate to replace the CRA/LA slush fund which the State abolished effective 2-2-2012 in order to avoid bankruptcy. That's why Garcetti et alia started the illegal LA Economic Development agency and are giving its $32 Million.  That may be only 1/10 of what the CRA would have hauled in this year, but it shows Garcetti's firm and unbreakable commitment to send tax dollars to developers and away from roads, police, paramedics, firemen, etc.

gottaknow247
gottaknow247 like.author.displayName 1 Like

If you want to drive on good roads in California anymore, you need to visit our National Parks and monuments , like Death Valley or Joshua Tree.  I spent the weekend in DV and the roads were perfect, probably because they're not maintained with Caltrans money.  The difference between inside these parks and outside are stunning.  I can remember a time when California highways were praised. 

erikkengaard
erikkengaard

@gottaknow247 - that was before California went beyond the optimum population of 20 million mostly middle class people from Iowa, Minnesota and other points east. Look at the 1940 census data for Oakland, San Jose, Glendale and you find a thriving middle class.

GovernmentHooker
GovernmentHooker

"If you think our streets our crumbling before our very eyes, you're not alone."


If you think this writer should know the difference between OUR and ARE, stop reading LA Weekly. 

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

Home

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city