Top

blog

Stories

 

Jack Humphreville Fights Lone-Wolf Campaign Against City Hall Power Brokers and Los Angeles' Proposition A Sales Tax Measure

Categories: Election 2013

Screen Shot 2013-03-01 at 1.10.54 PM copy.jpg
Jack Humphreville
Read L.A. Weekly's news story on Proposition A: "L.A. Sales Tax Hike: Will $211 Million Increase Fix City's Problems?"

While nearly all of L.A.'s political establishment -- Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, City Council President Herb Wesson, and deep-pocketed special interests -- are lining up behind Proposition A, City Hall watchdog Jack Humphreville is conducting what's essentially an unofficial, one-man campaign to defeat the highly controversial sales tax hike.

Humphreville is getting some support from like-minded folks like former Los Angeles Daily News editor Ron Kaye, but it's basically his show -- and he's doing it with no official web site, no campaign consultants, and no budget.

"It's David versus Goliath," Humphreville tells the Weekly, "although we're not even David. We're a bunch of pip-squeaks trying to fight the establishment."

Humphreville, an affable, wise-cracking, 66-year-old father of three, twenty-something daughters, says the proposed sales tax would be used to put a small band aid on the city's broken pension system, and not for more city services.

"It's just going to feed the beast," he says. "It doesn't solve the problem. It's going to encourage more bad behavior."

Such as Villaraigosa's and the City Council's favorite habit of sticking taxpayers with under-the-radar parking, trash, and other fee increases to plug short-term holes in the city's multi-billion-dollar budget.

The Yes on A campaign has over $1 million in contributions, with powerful politicians Wesson and Villaraigosa leading the charge. The unofficial No on A campaign is led by Humphreville, a member of the Greater Wilshire Neighborhood Council and co-owner of the Recycler and Recycler.com. He lives in Windsor Square with his wife.

"And with the mayor," quips Humphreville, referring to the mayor's official residence in that affluent neighborhood.

Humphreville has lived in L.A. for nearly 29 years. He regularly comments about city affairs on the website CityWatchLA.com, and helped to defeat the troubled and very controversial solar power plan, Measure B, in 2009.

Back then, Humphreville had a few more friends helping him.

This time around, Humphreville is more of the lone wolf, but he's still reviled by the L.A. political establishment. "I am not the mayor's best friend," Humphreville says with a chuckle.

Humphreville's no-frills No on A push is only anchored by a Facebook page and a Facebook group. That's it. "I haven't spent a damn dime," he says.

But the watchdog probably spends up to 30 hours a week writing articles and talking with neighborhood councils across Los Angeles. He's also made a YouTube video.

"I haven't seen anybody who's really in favor of [Proposition A]," says Humphreville. "They don't just say 'no,' they say 'hell no.' There's a complete distrust of the system."

While there's no official slogan for Humphreville's campaign, he likes to refer to Proposition A as "Herb's sleazy slush fund," referring to City Council President Herb Wesson, of course.

Humphreville says simply about Proposition A, "It's a con job."

Contact Patrick Range McDonald at pmcdonald@laweekly.com.

My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
phinnoho
phinnoho

Jack is the Energizer Bunny that this city needs to pushback against one of the worst municipal governments in the nation.

scottzwartz
scottzwartz topcommenter

Jack H also fought against Garcetti's pet project, 1601 N. Vine, after other activists had uncovered a $1.4 Million appraisal fraud by Garcetti and his cohorts.  When the City bought the property from Hal Katersky- Steve Ullman for $5.4 M, they relied on a $5.4 Million appraisal which the developer-seller had obtained.  In the same month, the CRA itself obtained an appraisal for $4.0 Million.  Not only were "developer obtained appraisals not to be used," the penal code required the CRA and Garcetti to disclose to the other City Council members that there CRA appraisal said that 1601 N. Vine was worth $1.4 Million less than the Katersky-Ullman-Garcetti appraisal.  If one applied the Duck Test, their failure to disclose lower CRA appraisal was a criminal fraud (but when your Daddy was the DA, there's no need to worry.)

A few years later when the hidden CRA $4.0 M appraisal was found (leaked by CRA staffer), Garcetti had the City sell the land back to the developer for only $835,000.  That's right Garcetti had the City pay $5.4 M and then had the City sell it back for only 15%.  Also, the developer did not have to make any mortgage payments during the intervening years as the CRA "technically" owned the land.  That saved the developer about $6 M.  No wonder Garcetti raised so much cash to run for mayor.  The City is like the developers's personal ATM machine, but it is short of cash, so we have Prop A.

One of the major reasons that the City claims it needs to raise the city sales tax is that Garcetti, Wesson, etc have transferred so many hundreds of millions of tax dollars to their friends via such shady deals.  Naturally, they do no want Jack H writing about their scams. 

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city