Welcome to blogs.laweekly.com
Blogs
  • News
    • Daily News
    • LA Daily
    • Deadline Hollywood
    • Horoscope
    • Weekly Newsletter
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Music
    • West Coast Sound
    • Music Picks
    • Music Newsletter
    • Find a Bar or Club
    • Submit an Event
    • Summer Concert Guide
    • Detour
    • Digital Jukebox
    • Entertainment Ads
    • Nightranger
  • Calendar
    • Top Picks
    • HoopLA
    • Valentine's Day Events
    • Events Newsletter
    • Submit an Event
    • Entertainment Ads
  • Restaurants
    • Squid Ink
    • Restaurant Guide
    • Ask Mr. Gold
    • Restaurant Reviews
    • Gold Standard Newsletter
    • First Bite
    • Online Sponsored Menus
    • Restaurant Ads
  •  
  • Arts
    • Art Features
    • Book Features
    • Style Council
    • Theater Features
    • Theater Reviews
    • Theater Newsletter
    • Stage Raw & Theater Listings
    • Theater Awards
  • Films
    • Features
    • Reviews
    • Voice Film
    • Now Showing
    • Theaters
    • Good Rep
    • Short Run
    • Screeners Newsletter
    • Movie Ads
  • The Ads
    • Ad Index
    • Flip Book
  • Classifieds
    • Free Classifieds
    • Personals
    • Virtual Career Fair
    • Real Estate for Sale
    • Personals Blogs
    • Alternative Healing
  • Blogs
    • LA Daily
    • West Coast Sound
    • Squid Ink
    • Style Council
    • Voice Film
    • Slideshows
  • Columns
    • LA Life
    • A Considerable Town
    • Candyland
    • LA People
    • Style Council
    • Horoscope
  • Best Of
    • Bars & Clubs
    • Food & Drink
    • People & Places
    • Nightlife
    • Shopping & Services
    • Sports & Recreation
    • Best Of Ads
  • Bars/Clubs
    • Bars + Clubs Home
    • Bar+Club Ads
    • Marijuana Dispensaries
  • Archives
  • Reader Recommendations
  • Promotions
    • Ad Index
    • Events
    • Flipbook
    • Gold Standard Newsletter
    • LA Weekend
    • Theater Awards
    • Web Awards
    • Detour
    • Txt Alerts
    • Street Team
    • Join the Street Team
    • On Sale!
    • Free Stuff
  • Site Map

Top

blog

Stories

  • City News

    Jackson Doc Charged In Pop Star's Death

    By Dennis Romero

    1
  • City News

    Can You Openly Carry A Gun In L.A.?

    By Dennis Romero

    2
  • City News

    Charlie Sheen's Car Crashes Without Him

    By Dennis Romero

    3
  • City News

    Freaked Out High Flyer Blames Medical Pot

    By Dennis Romero

    4
  • City News

    Police: Fake Cop Deports Relative's Wife

    By Dennis Romero

    5
  • City News

    Pregnancy Deaths Triple In State

    By Dennis Romero

    6
  • City News

    Report: Jackson Doc Facing Manslaughter

    By Dennis Romero

    7
  • City News

    Mayor V. Jive Talks With 'Brother' Jaime Foxx

    By Dennis Romero

    8
  • City News

    Report: Jackson Doc Ready To Surrender

    By Dennis Romero

    9
  • City News

    Apple Gets Razzed For iPad Name

    By Dennis Romero

    10
  • City News

    Today In WTF: Man Masturbates Next To Freeway

    By Dennis Romero

    11
  • City News

    Today In WTF: NBC Buys Show From Conan

    By Dennis Romero

    12
  • City News

    Should Hollywood Be Afraid Of The...

    By Dennis Romero

    13
  • City News

    Many On Council Had 'Joint Committee' Experience

    By Dennis Romero

    14
  • City News

    SoCal Mosque Spy Sues FBI

    By Dennis Romero

    15
 
City News

Union Seeks to Block City's Early Retirement Pact

By Steven Mikulan, Wednesday, Jul. 1 2009 @ 1:27PM
Comments (22)
Categories:


Bob Aquino must feel a little besieged these days. Not only has the Los Angeles city employees union he heads been the target of membership raids by a rival union, but now his members find themselves on the municipal chopping block as the first municipal employees facing layoff notices.

The story has its roots in Aquino's Engineers and Architects Association's bitter feud with Local 721 of the Service Employees International Union, a union long allied with Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. SEIU 721 and the Association of Federal, State, County and Municipal Employees are the dominant players within the Coalition of L.A. City Unions, the umbrella organization that since 2008 has been negotiating with the city's Chief Administrative Officer to shield as many of its 22,000 constituent members as possible from the current budget meltdown.The EAA is not a member of the coalition.

The coalition has pressed the city to allow its members to retire early, rather than force them out through layoffs and furloughs. Although Villaraigosa had seemed to backtrack last March on pledges to consider early retirement, on Monday the two sides reached a tentative agreement embracing early retirements. When the pact was announced, however, it also became clear that members of EAA, which was not a signatory to the deal, would be the first city employees laid off. Today, EAA lawyers are going to court to try to block the agreement, contesting the legality of unilateral furloughs.

When asked Tuesday by the L.A. Weekly if he thought this was payback for the ongoing membership war between the 7800-member EAA, which includes accountants, chemists, forensic scientists and other highly paid specialists, and the much larger SEIU 721, Aquino did not hesitate to answer.

"It's completely related," EAA's executive director said, and then outlined his version of SEIU's alleged raiding war against EAA, a dispute in which SEIU encouraged Aquino's members to decertify from EAA and re-affiliate with SEIU.

"The mayor was underwriting SEIU's attempt to take over EAA," Aquino said. "The mayor had city management support SEIU - supervisors directly told [our] members to vote for SEIU. He gave city office space and telephones to SEIU. He used to work for SEIU and derives a lot of political capital from SEIU."

SEIU 721's regional director, Julie Butcher, denies Aquino's charges.

"If there's such a thing as union malpractice," Butcher says, "he's guilty of it. We've been helping [EAA's] members escape to find a union that respects their work. His animosity towards the city overshadows his ability to represent his membership."

It's no secret that over the past year deep fissures have broken out in an American labor movement first split in 2005 when the SEIU and its international president, Andy Stern, led a walkout of six other large unions from the AFL-CIO. This has been followed by open warfare among unionized healthcare, hospitality and service workers belonging to SEIU locals and rival unions. In a remarkable decision, the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, whose actions are largely spearheaded by SEIU locals, passed a resolution in April condemning SEIU interference in the affairs of other L.A. unions.

Yet EAA is hardly without its own critics. Aquino and his union often find themselves at odds with the rest of the local labor movement, some of whose leaders view EAA as an enclave of highly paid white-collar workers who don't feel sufficiently motivated by labor solidarity. (For a description, see Jeffrey Anderson's 2005 L.A. Weekly article, Second Banana.) Last year, for example, EAA came out against Measure R and its half-cent tax hike -- while the rest of L.A. labor, led by the County Fed, mobilized its members to ensure its passage.

Its prickly relations with other unions may explain EAA's refusal to join the coalition, whose other unions include Teamsters Local 911, Laborers' International Union Local 777, International Union of Operating Engineers Local 501 and the L.A./O.C. County Building and Construction Trades Council. Aquino claims that its board of governors decided not to join the coalition because EAA would not have voting representation proportional to its size. Beyond this, he says that additional nonstarters included the other unions' willingness to accept "reopeners" - mechanisms that permit contracts previously hammered out with the city to be renegotiated during times of economic emergencies. Aquino told the L.A. Weekly that, like other city unions, EAA had agreed to consider wage freezes, but would not part with a three-percent cost of living raise it had won in its last contract with the city.

Here again, though, memories of his union's fights with SEIU 721 may have played a role in Aquino's unwillingness to participate in those negotiations.

"721 is not a union," Aquino says flatly. "SEIU doesn't argue with management - all their leaders want are dues."

"The bottom line," says Barbara Maynard, a spokeswoman for the coalition, "is that we saved the city a lot of money and saved jobs for our members."

Even now, with EAA's lawyers trying to derail the still-unratified agreement between City Hall and the coalition, Aquino sounds conciliatory.

"We're still willing to negotiate," he said.

Tags:

Antonio Villaraigosa, Barbara Maynard, Coalition of L.A. City Unions, Engineers and Architects Association, Julie Butcher, Robert Aquino, SEIU 721
Comments (22) Write Comment
Share

Related Content

  • City Employees Ratify Budget Pact July 22, 2009
  • In Miguel’s Shoes June 9, 2005
  • Not So Fast August 4, 2005
  • Caretakers Take Charge March 4, 1999
  • Pocket of Trouble March 9, 2006

More About:

  • Bob Aquino
  • Service Employees International Union
  • Antonio Villaraigosa
  • Labor Unions
  • Jobs and Labor

Comments (22)

Irene says:

The famous Bob Aquino spin is at work in this article. The truth is that it was EAA members (not the Mayor) that approached SEIU and asked for help to decertify from EAA and affiliate with SEIU. EAA members (including me) are tired of always getting the worst contracts, of being embarrassed by Aqunio who likes to bicker with other unions and with elected officials, and who is never professional. We wanted to get out. Aquino has been a terrible union head. Nobody wants to deal with him - EAA should have joined the coalition and we would be planning our Fourth of July weekend today instead of comtemplating lifestyle changes to accommodate our redcued salaries. With Aquino at the lead, EAA will NEVER get a good contract. He antagonizes the Mayor and Council members consistently - the very people that he is supposed to be negotiating with. EAA deserves a better leader - EAA deserves a professional leader. This article doesn't tell the whole story - the coalition of unions is being rewarded for deferring their annual cost of living increases by getting larger increases in the later years of their contract. EAA members get a 10% pay and probably lay-offs. The coalition worked with the City to develop a plan that would prevent furloughs and lay-offs. EAA refused to negotiate.

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 2 2009 @ 3:11PM
Sue says:

There is one glaring mistake in your article. When you say EAA would not give up their 3% COLA you were only partially correct. The City demanded they give that 3% up before the City would even sit down and talk. EAA would not make a prior concession before even saying "hello". The City is the one refusing to talk.

Sadly, Irene is obviously one of the handful of EAA dissenters and actually believes the lies she repeats. In fact, SEIU spent $5,000,000 to try to decertify EAA and hatched their raid in Washington at SEIU headquarters long before any EAA member was even remotely involved. This is standard Andy Stern procedure. EAA could not have spent even 1/10 as much, since they did not bring in hordes of outsiders like SEIU did, yet the vast majority of EAA members chose to stay with their union. If one were to actually read the new agreement the Coalition has, one would see that is once again a completely management friendly document, not a worker friendly document, and not a mutually friendly document.

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 2 2009 @ 3:37PM
Sue says:

Glaring mistake in your article: City demanded that EAA give up its 3% COLA before they would even say "hello" to EAA, let alone negotiate. EAA believes there should be no prior concessions, but that all items should be properly negotiated.

Sadly, Irene actually believes the lies she repeats. In truth, the SEIU raid on EAA was hatched in Andy Stern's offices in Washington, D. C. long before any EAA member was involved. SOP for Stern. SEIU spent $5,000,000 and brought in hordes of outsiders to raid. EAA could not have spent even 1/10th as much, yet the vast majority of EAA members voted to stay with EAA! And if one actually analyzes the agreement between the Coalition and the City and analyzes the retirement incentive, one would discover that, as usual, the Coalition has agreed to an substandard and management friendly-contract.

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 2 2009 @ 3:46PM
Irene says:

Sadly, Sue is one of the blind Aquino followers that cannot wake up and face reality. That, or she enjoys being embarrassed by EAA's many errors and missteps - what a strange fetish. Aquino is a failure - his time as the director of EAA has seen more blunders than the Bush administration. I've read the coalition's agreement and it again reminded me of the mistake EAA made by not being part of the coalition. Only EAA members will be furloughed? Remind me again who got the better deal.

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 2 2009 @ 3:48PM
al says:

As an observer and outsider, my instincts tell me EAA is right. Historically when Unions colludes with management the clueless membership suffers. This habit has been part the downfall of uniouns over the last 30 years or so.

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 2 2009 @ 7:23PM
freddy says:

Irene has made accusations and nothing to support them. Typical SEIU supporter MU

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 2 2009 @ 8:26PM
Frank says:

Irene is speaking typical SEIU babble. Sue has the facts right on. Julie Butcher spoke at my work location today and they were voting on an incomplete Early retirement Incentive Proposal (ERIP). Julie was asked a question about ERIP & said we are working to reduce/eliminate excluded/capped classifications. She also stated that ballots on ERIP/deferring COLA's should be received by members today or early next week. I would like to have the complete, finished document before I vote. Not a partially completed document that can change after I cast my vote!

I have been able to easily verify EAA's claims but SEIU's claims are partial statements and BULLS*IT! I wish I was in EAA instead of SEIU!!!! SEIU sucks with their Member Resource Center instead of REAL Labor Reps! I hope we can decert to EAA!!

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 2 2009 @ 9:44PM
Rocky says:

During the raid on EAA, a city employee accessed the Paysr database and stole (EAA represented), employee's personal information and turned it over to SEIU. Yet the city has looked the other way and done nothing to about this. This amounts to a breach of a database that contains birth dates, SSN's, and Direct Deposit Bank account information as well as home addresses and phone number which SEIU used during the harassment campaign of EAA members. You never saw that in the news! On the ERIP, all one has to do is read the agreement. The city has forced language into this agreement that would make retirees refund their ERIP money should this agreement be found illegal years from now!
Also if the .75% increase in contribution to the pension fund that ALL LACER participants will have to pay without getting the same benefit as those that retire, doesn't cover the actual cost of the EIRP, the city can force all active employees to pay more into the pension fund, without any of us getting to say one thing about it, and once this plan is in effect it can not be reversed. So the city will assume no liability for the ERIP and all of us employees will get screwed. So I ask you how is that a good deal for any of us. Why is it written like that, because the city knows it's illegal and they deferred the financial responsibility back on the city employees who are still working. that's why EAA is fighting this. Julie Butcher would have you believe that this was a great victory for city workers, you decided for yourself. Don't let her or any of her other cronies decide for you. If you are SEIU and want to get out and join a union that actually earns their union dues money, then do so, take the first step. I for one am glad that I am part of EAA and part of a Union that WILL fight for me. I don't like Unions in General, But I know, had it not been for EAA, The city would have screwed me and my co-workers over every time that they wanted money for another pet project. By the way, what ever happened to the 68 million dollars that the Mayor convinced the pension boards to invest in to the Genesis II Fund, REIT for downtown?

Posted On: Friday, Jul. 3 2009 @ 7:15PM
lacityworkers says:

Funny how spin is always thrown out.
There is a forum full of people complaining about these so called negotiations and complete failure to represent the majority of civilian workers. See http://www.lacityworkers.com

Why allow your union to collaborate with management?
The majority of people pushing for early retirement are retirement age, forcing everyone else to pay for there retirement through increased contributions.
It's a joke and so is the voting procedure.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 7 2009 @ 4:34PM
Zach says:

this Irene person is hilarious. The more I read about Bob Aquino and the more I hear folks complain about him, the more I LIKE him. Union guys are SUPPOSED to be a-holes, they are SUPPOSED to fight against Management. Otherwise, they wouldn't be a Union (see SEIU for a perfect example).

The Mayor and other Management officials are NOT looking out for the workers' best interests. They never have and never will, that's not their function. It's the Union that has to look out for us, and that's exactly what I see Bob and our Union doing for us.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 7 2009 @ 7:02PM
Dave says:

Strange how unions that work to try to a) prevent the loss of jobs, b) save people a real cut in pay (we'll ask EAA members how much less their next check is even with their 3% raise) and c) make it easier for the highest paid in the city's workforce move off the payroll without putting them on the unemployment line, is branded as evil while the union that refusues to negotiate and for years has proven they would rather fight than win, is branded the hero in this article. The LA Weekly has long had an anti-City bias, and this article proves it.

Let us make no mistake, the City got itself into this mess with years of mismanagement, and I am not trying to make apologies for it. But to ignore the very real economic conditions and the budget messes not only in the City, but the State and many other local governments at this time is to have your head in the sand. The Coalition unions saw this coming and went to their membership to ask for direction. Overwhelmingly the answer was no furloughs, no layoffs and an early retirement incentive. I know, I was at the meetings. The Coalition then took that as their platform to negotiate. They did what they are obligated to do by their bylaws and good conscience, and negotiated the best possible agreement to benefit the majority of their members. When did negotiation become collaoration?

Is the tentative agreement perfect? Well, no. But we are not in perfect times, either. The agreement affords a lot of protections workers will not have if it is voted down. Can the City afford to let all people go that might want to in a classification? Any reasonable person would say you have to have someone left to mind the store. And, by retiring people instead of laying off, the City will save up to 6000 jobs. That is very important these days. These people would end up a burden of the state on the unemployment line.

If the Coalition unions had done as the EAA did, and stood by and did nothing while their membership was furloughed and laid off, this article would be about why the Coalition had failed its membership. Why is Aquino being branded a hero when he so miserably failed his?

Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 7 2009 @ 8:55PM
Zach says:

Wrong, Dave. The Coalition agreed too much for blind assurances from the City that they would TRY not to lay them off. If the ERIP goes through, it WILL be more expensive than the crappy estimates they have. And the employees that the Coalition is supposed to be working for will be responsible to pay whatever that cost is. How is that a good agreement?

Bob and the EAA governors have tried to NEGOTIATE with the City, not just find ways for their membership to pay more and more back. The City has been dishonest this entire time, and it's weak unions like those in the Coalition who make it harder for REAL unions to protect their membership.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 7 2009 @ 9:30PM
Dave says:

Wrong, Zach. Again, I was in the meeting when the TA was finalized. No furloughs for two years, period. No one has a crystal ball, but all projections are that next year's budget will be worse than this year. There are seven steps in place that the City will have to take before proceeding with layoffs next year. Sure, the City could end up doing layoffs next year after all. But the incentive is to find any way possible to avoid it.

As for the retirement, again there is no crystal ball. We honestly do not know what the state of LACERS will be in future years. Most of it depends on the economy. While our extra contributions will be slightly more now, there is a limit, and there is a sunset. I am willing to pay a little extra now to ensure my retirement system is viable when I retire, and able to support those who retire now. Maybe EAA members just don't care about other City workers.

Bob sat in every meeting the rest of the Coalition did. The CAO has the sign-in sheets to prove it. Instead of negotiating, he cast stones at those that were honestly trying to save jobs, and he continues to do so. Zach, it's time to put down the Kool-aid and look around your membership to see why so many are jumping ship. For the record, I am not an SEIU member.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 7 2009 @ 10:01PM
David says:

Remember years back, EAA screwed up when the City unions were trying to increase the retirement percentage. EAA voted down the increase...remember! So, what did we all get out of that move by you guys?

Once again, EAA is off the mark. I don't care about SEIU vs EAA or vice versa. I care about City employees not being furloughed or laid off. Again, you let me know when you get your first check with your pay cut how you feel. Especially, the check with two furlough days. Ok, if EAA stops the furlough...guess what? Next, the City will move to layoff EAA members. I hope not, but it will move that way.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 7 2009 @ 10:30PM
Zach says:

WRONG, Dave. There is no cap on the employee contribution amount. Employees will be responsible for the TOTAL COST, whatever they figure that out to be, to cover these early retirements. .75% is a start and a guaranteed minimum increase. IT will go as high as it needs to to cover the costs of these early retirements. You obviously have NOT read the agreement.

As for your naivete on how much Management will "try" not to do furloughs. That's laughable.

"There are seven steps in place that the City will have to take before proceeding with layoffs next year. Sure, the City could end up doing layoffs next year after all. But the incentive is to find any way possible to avoid it."

Incentive? Ha! What's the incentive? All Coalition unions have a reopener in their contract, which FORCES them to meet and confer basically whenever the City says so. How much you want to bet in a few years when those Coalition "deferred" raises come due the City declares ANOTHER fiscal emergency and decides it wants to renegotiate these now two year old raises yet again.

What exactly is their incentive? They jerked EVERYONE around for over a year on the ERIP, just to take it off the table and negotiate a back room deal with ONLY COALITION UNIONS that not only opens employees up to limitless increases on their LACERS contributions but also makes them SOLELY RESPONSIBLE to pay for those early retirements. It's a crappy deal that was drawn up behind closed doors by crappy unions.

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 8 2009 @ 5:38PM
Astonished says:

I just got through reading the article and all the comments. I have NEVER been a union person, as result, as it so happens, of having to have been forced to be a member of 721 (it was SEIU 347 back then). I have also read that so called "tenative agreement" between the City and 721/Coalition unions. That is a very scary document and it is designed "Screw" all of their members if it is adopted! The facts listed in that document are: 1. If the City declares that they have lost 100 million in revenue from any fund, or combination of funds, the unions, under that agreement, must pay the City at least 1/3 of whatever the loss is. The City is already 530 million in the hole, so another 100 million isn't so far fetched. 2. There is no guarentee of protection from layoffs or furloughs, the wording says the City will "try" not to furlough Coalition and 721 members and if they do furlough, one of the COLA's is removed! 3. If that agreement is found to be illegal AT ANY TIME in the future, anyone who received ERIP funds must pay it all back! 4. All coalition and 721 members will have their retirement contributions raised to 6.75% immediately. If LACERS decides sometime in the future that isn't enough, they can raise the contributions to any amount THERE IS NO CAP! 5. Their union dues will automatically go to 1.75% of their pay, and will raise every time the members get a raise! So how much of your raises do you think their union members will pocket after that? 6. If this "agreement" fails, all coalition and 721 members will have to make up the 26 furlough days within whatever time is left in the fiscal year, be it 10 months or 6 months! Personally, I can tell a rotten deal when I smell one, and this one stinks to the high heaven! EAA feels that such conditions are extordinarily bad for their members, and I agree! Facts are facts folks. Hasn't any of the members of 721 wondered why Julie the Butcher has such a lucritive position in the Mayor's office? If that doesn't smack of conflict of interest I don't know what does!! Believe me, if you belong to the coalition or 721 and you pass that agreement you will live to regret it. But your union will love it! Me, I'll stick with EAA.

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 9 2009 @ 3:04PM
Joe says:

Why would anybody in their right-mind vote for this ERIP? It makes current employees liable for potential future pension fund deficits! Currently there is no such employee obligation. Absolutely mind-boggling!

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 9 2009 @ 6:18PM
Even More Astonished says:

Wow! Does this place ever stink of EAA shills (staff)! What do you guys care? You don't even allow your members to vote!

http://www.cpcs.umb.edu/labor_notes/files/29107.pdf

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 9 2009 @ 9:34PM
Joe says:

"Even More Astonished says:
Wow! Does this place ever stink of EAA shills (staff)!"

If you can't attack the message try attacking the messengers. Sorry, doesn't work. Please explain why SEIU gave away the proverbial kitchen sink on their ERIP "deal."

Posted On: Friday, Jul. 10 2009 @ 8:00AM
Disgusted says:

EAA rigs their own elections...

SEIU buys elections.... check out the latest County Supervisor Election. 90% paid for by SEIU coalition...

They are all greedy self promoting corporate players. We should become a "Right to Work State"... and knock all the bozos down to size...

Posted On: Monday, Jul. 13 2009 @ 8:02AM
Deadwood-NOT says:

They should just begin the layoff process, its going to have to be done sooner or later...

Posted On: Monday, Jul. 13 2009 @ 11:31AM
Deadwood-NOT says:

They should just begin the layoff process, its going to have to be done sooner or later...

Posted On: Monday, Jul. 13 2009 @ 11:31AM

Write Comment


Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By clicking "Post," you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms.

Tools

Search LA Daily


Follow

Email tips to tips@laweekly.com

SlideShows»

  • Haiti Relief Benefit Concert @ El Rey Theatre
  • Jammin' & Wailin': A Bob Marley Celebration at Mr. Musichead Gallery
  • First Fridays feat. Warpaint and Yeasayer @ Natural History Museum
  • More Slideshows >>

Most …

  • Residents Protest Massive Westside Development
  • Credit Agencies Warn City On Budget
  • 'Save the Peak:' Deal In Place To Preserve Land Adjacent To Hollywood Sign
  • New Foothill Evacuations Ordered Ahead Of New Storm
  • David Beckham's Soccer Academy Goes Belly-Up
  • More Recent Entries...
  • Redneck-style bust in Mar Vista on Westside: LAPD gets big load of machine guns (17)
  • Do You Have The Right To Bear Arms In L.A.? At Starbucks, It Seems You Do (16)
  • Tough Guy Used Text Messages To Extort Victims (14)
  • Villaraigosa Voted Worst Angeleno Of All Time (9)
  • Nearly One In Four Car-Vs.-Bike Collisions Are Hit-And-Runs (8)
  • Do You Have The Right To Bear Arms In L.A.? At Starbucks, It Seems You Do
  • Pregnancy-Related Deaths Have Tripled In California
  • Today In WTF: Man Allegedly Poses As U.S. Agent, Deports Relative's Wife
  • Redneck-style bust in Mar Vista on Westside: LAPD gets big load of machine guns
  • Villaraigosa Voted Worst Angeleno Of All Time

Calendar

  • Tue
    9
  • Wed
    10
  • Thu
    11
  • Fri
    12
  • Sat
    13
  • Sun
    14
  • Mon
    15
This week's best events
3 Best Things To Do on Tuesday, Feb 9
  • St. Vincent

    Where: El Rey Theatre

    Type: Pop, Rock

  • The TED2010 Convention

    Where: Long Beach Performing Arts Center, Center Theater

    Type: Conventions, Technology Events

  • Writers Bloc: Lori Gottlieb and Sandra Tsing Loh

    Where: Temple Emanuel

    Type: Literary Events, Talks

  • submit an event
  • 169 more things to do today >>

Twitter Feed

Follow LA Daily on Twitter

More Twitter >>

LA Daily on Digg

Services

  • www.MyBioDental.com

    View Ad | View Site

General

  • Pleasure Chest

    View Ad | View Site
  • Hustler Hollywood

    View Ad | View Site

Education

  • American Academy Of Dramatic Arts

    View Ad | View Site
More >>

Links

Blogroll

  • LAist
  • LA Observed
  • Mayor Sam
  • LA Voice
  • Fishbowl LA
  • Boing Boing
  • Curbed LA
  • Eater LA
  • Losanjealous
  • Streets Blog
  • Los Angeles Met Blogs
  • Blog Downtown
  • LA Taco
  • A Special Thing
  • The Coming
  • Los Angeles City Zine
  • Witness LA
  • Street Hassle
About Us | Work for LA Weekly | Esubscribe | Free Classifieds | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Problem With the Site? | RSS | Site Map
©2010 Village Voice Media All rights reserved.