Los Angeles - Los Angeles Median Home Value: $380,000 - LA Daily

Blogs

Previous: Stage Raw: Playboy of the Western World

Next: Anand Jon's Defense Begins - Sort Of

Los Angeles Median Home Value: $380,000

by Jill Stewart

October 15, 2008 12:31 PM

Amazing story in this week's Los Angeles Business Journal, which has been beating the hell out of the Los Angeles Times in reporting on all the billionaires in L.A. who have lost vast sums — including Kirk Kerkorian, Sumner Restore, Eli Broad — or those whose companies have vanished or might get snapped up — including Angelo Mozilo (Countrywide Financial, the disastrous subprime lender) and much lesser known billionaire Steven Udvar-Hazy (International Lease Finance Corp., which reaps its dough by leasing jets to Hollywood stars and billionaires.)

Too bad for them, eh? But this week's Business Journal cover is even more riveting, showing a $200,000 drop in the median value of Los Angeles County homes in just one year. On Page 31, the paper offers up a fascinating zip code list showing a collapse almost everywhere, from Burbank's pricey view community 91504 to Studio City's leafy, 'burb-like 91604 to Silver Lake's hip but sadly density-threatened 90039.

Last year, a Weekly story by David Ferrell laid out the beginning of these troubles, with economists warning that the worst of foreclosures and home value drops were yet to come.

As Ferrell wrote, for everyone in L.A. who was mystified at how "home buyers somehow were able to afford $585,000 homes — the median, at which 50 percent of L.A. home buyers paid more and 50 percent paid less — the mystery has been solved: Buyers couldn’t actually afford the prices, but bought anyway."

That piece was especially prescient, with Angelenos in severe trouble because they tricked themselves, buying a home with no money down, or, even worse, signing up for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's "liar loans" in which buyers did not have to prove their true income, and told very tall tales to get a house.

What was gripping Angelenos who, with a median household income of about $45,000, clearly could not afford a $400,000 or $800,000 house, yet bought anyway — urged on by the sleazeballs who ran Countrywide, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

It's the same thing that gripped the Dutch in the famed tulip craze of 1637, when the insane speculation in tulips collapsed right after the Bubonic Plague hit, and it turned out that many of the Dutch had listed their tulip investments as a key part of their wills.

They were certain the tulip bubble could never burst. Just like the housing bubble.

Tags: eli broad, housing bubble, kirk kerkorian, los angeles, los angeles business journal, los angeles median home value, los angeles times, median housing value, steven udvar-hazy, subprime, sumner redstone, tulip craze

Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)

Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mt.laweekly.com/mt-tb.cgi/85796

Comments

There are 3 comments posted for this article.

Lizzy,

Not a pretty sight.

Jay

Posted on October 15, 2008 2:00 PM by Jay

Don't forget the same thing happened in tech stocks when that bubble burst in the late 1990's. Things do not look good in California right now. However, don't forget those basic economic lessons - what goes up, must come down. We are obviously on the down end, but eventually home prices will level out in LA and the rest of the country. Hopefully things can recover quicker than expected, however.

Posted on October 16, 2008 8:27 AM by Real Estate Agent

Liar loans also meant people lying to themselves that they could afford $3,800. -$5,500. house payment forever even though they did not make enough. Property tax, water, utilities, car gas, child care expense, car payment , entertainment were sometimes put on credit cards and they have not even bought groceries to eat yet. Life's a bitch.

Posted on November 8, 2008 10:21 PM by rs