Previous: Letter From Moscow: U.S. Dollar Follies
Next: Still Trying to Figure Out What to Do on the Fourth?

Queer Town: Power to the Sissies

by Patrick Range McDonald
July 2, 2008 6:00 AM

Sister Unity stood before me in West Hollywood Park on the first full day of legal gay marriage in California. She was dressed head-to-toe in drag and sounded somewhat disappointed.

“A gay guy walked up to me and said, ‘Do you really think this is going to help us in November?’ When he said it, 'power to the sissies' came to my mind.”

She was part of a two-person contingent representing the Los Angeles chapter of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, a drag queen outfit that puts a queer spin on Catholic nun-hood. Some people think they’re wacky, but I’ve always seen them as fun…and a lip-sticked reminder of the kind of rebel streak that’s needed to be out and gay.


Queer%20Town%20photos%20002.jpg
At West Hollywood Park on June 17, the media ignored Sister Unity, left, and Sister Margaret Snatcher and instead swarmed actor George Takei (in the background) and his fiancé Brad Altman.

Sister Unity’s story also reminded me of something I had been brooding over since the state validated the anti-gay marriage November ballot measure, now known as Proposition 8. Already, I had been hearing from aides to Los Angeles politicians that gay rights groups asked them not to marry gays en masse so straight folks wouldn’t be freaked out by the sight of hundreds of husbands and husbands and wives and wives kissing each other on the front steps of City Hall in downtown.

A coalition of gay rights groups that included the Human Rights Campaign and Lambda Legal also released a "joint advisory" called “Make Change, Not Lawsuits,” which warned people against getting married in California, flying back to their home states, and suing federal or state governments. LA Weekly then ran an article that explained the advisory wasn’t so much about avoiding “bad rulings,” as the groups wrote, but more about keeping things calm for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

So with this stuff swirling in my head, the gay man's comment to Sister Unity made me wonder: Are gays—you and me—being pressured by our own people to hide certain things about ourselves? Are we, in some way, being shoved back into the closet? I tried to talk with some activists I respect in the gay community, but they either never got back to me or dismissed these nagging thoughts outright. So I tracked down writer and gay provocateur Larry Kramer, figuring he would speak out if something was up. I mentioned Sister Unity’s run in and put my closet questions to him.


800px-Larry_Kramer_spring_2_by_David_Shankbone.jpg
(Larry Kramer in New York City. Photo by David Shankbone)


“This has been going on since the Garden of Eden,” Kramer responded in an email. “People are going to do (and wear) what they are going to do. That's why HIV never goes away. I will say that I am seeing a lot of guys in suits getting married and women in dresses, so that can balance things out more than usual, no? I haven't seen any guys in drag getting married, I mean full drag. I think I saw a few in leather. The ship didn't sink.”

I also asked for a historical perspective, if what Sister Unity encountered was something that happens every time gays win some kind of right? That gays try to appear more "normal" so we can be accepted in the mainstream?

“I have NEVER seen the gay population try to appear normal, as a concerted effort, trying to play down ANYTHING,” wrote Kramer, “You say ‘every time we win some kind of right.’ That is very generous of you. I wasn’t aware that we’ve won all that many rights.”

Kramer, a New Yorker who doesn't care too much for LA, wasn't aware of certain things brewing in California, so I contacted longtime gay rights activist Miki Jackson, who has a sharp eye for political/cultural trends and has lived in Los Angeles for over 30 years.

“Having the spotlight on we GLBTs seems to have some of that ‘put on your Sunday best’ aspect to it,” Jackson replied an email. “There are a lot of people who are kind of nervous and want to be respectable. Feeling like we will be scrutinized seems to turn that up. Also getting something and having the ax hanging over it is nervous making. There are always a lot of people who get upset because the media will focus on the flamboyant characters and that makes them feel like we will be judged harshly. I heard a lot of that leading up to the weddings, people were afraid there would be pictures of guys in drag everywhere.”

Jackson added, “I've always wondered if some of it goes back to pre-war Berlin, where the gays got some freedom and acceptance and it ended up that they came out of ‘hiding’ only to make it easier for the Nazis to round everyone up and send them off to camps.”

With the political campaigns starting to rev up to defeat Proposition 8, people will want to control messages and images sent out to the larger, and more heterosexual, public. (Read Variety Managing Editor's Ted Johnson's "Wilshire & Washington" column on media coverage of gay marriage.) I only wonder who will be ditched in the process. After all, as conventional thinking goes, and I’m no fan of conventional thinking, a front-page picture in the local newspaper of two men holding their adopted baby girl is much more preferred than two men in drag dressed up as nuns.

Maybe so, but at what cost? If we can’t embrace Sister Unity, who in the name of RuPaul will? And no one told the drag queens who started up the Stonewall Riots they wouldn’t be good for Gay Liberation. The ladies kicked butt just for the right to drink in a bar and not be hassled, and look where we are now. Something is happening, and it doesn’t feel right.


Contact Patrick Range McDonald at pmcdonald@laweekly.com.

Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBacks (0)
 

Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mt.laweekly.com/mt-tb.cgi/69302

 
Comments

There are 5 comments posted for this article.

Thanks for saying this Patrick. You are showing some guts, and that is all too rare in our corporatized "Gay" world, where the L's manage to press in some of the time, the transgendered are not welcome unless they dress and act "appropriately" and the 'B's have to pass. A long time age the Weekly did a cover story on "Trannie" Connie Norman. A fiery leader and a personal hero of mine. She always honored the sissy boys and the dikes as she proudly called us. She reminded us very publicly that they were out front all along and they bore the hardest consequences for us all. She also reminded us of how obtaining civil rights works. No one has civil rights until we solidify them for the people who are the farthest out of the mainstream. They are our pioneers and our canaries in the mineshaft. That has to start with each one of us. It was not the 'appropriate" members of our uneasy GLBT "community" that rioted at Stonewall or marched in those first Gay Liberation Front demonstrations in the streets of L.A. They come in, cautiously, after the Sissys and the Dykes and all the "inappropriate" people have cut the trails and made it "safe" for them.

Patrick you hit it right on the money. Although i can see why we as a community would want to "put our best foot forward", we can not do it at the expense of others in our community. This fight is not new though. We saw it earlier in the year when we pushed for an all inclusive ENDA. Most GLBT Orgs rallied behind our transgendered brothers and sisters and i think we as a community will continue to do so, even if some of the more mainstream orgs I won't mention by name are willing to leave them behind.

Here is a campaign that is trying to get the world record for the most simultaneous same-sex marriages (200 couples at once). It's an inventive way to celebrate the California ruling and highlight the positive. Here is a link to the campaign: https://www.thepoint.com/campaigns/same-sex-marriage-2008.

Some members of the GLBT community forget that individual liberty is the basis to protect everyone. There are no group rights to protect as none of us has any constitutional rights based upon any member in any group. A decision protecting individual rights helps each person without regard to any label he/she affixes to him/herself. The principle which all Americans, Gay, Straight and Whatever, need to protect are individual liberties. This November, the California Supreme Court's recognition of the individual liberty to marry whomever we chose is under attack, and the most serious threat to individual liberty comes from the bizzaro freak shows.

To the extent that the bizarrely offensive behavior of a few may cause hundreds of thousands to vote for a Constitutional amendment limiting individual liberty, they are placing their own egos far ahead of the needs of the country. These outlandish freaks are exactly what Karl Rove ordered. One can argue that these exhibitionists are the reason Bush won in the states with the anti-Gay marriage referendums.

If Californians limit individual liberties, that will harm not only Gays, but the nation itself. The reality is that these exhibitionists always seize extraordinarily important times in order to strut their stuff. The effect is always the same -- they enrage the far Right Wing to mobilize. For the Gay community, these self-indulgent exhibitionists are like the CIA's subverting democratic movements which the ruling party dislikes.

The right of two people of the same sex to marry has nothing to do transgenderism or cross dressing, and these exhibitionists should butt out and stop working as agents for the Right Wing. They benefit no one except the right wing bigots.

Clarification -- My objection to the freak shows at this time does not mean that at other times and places, they may not be helpful. I am thinking of Bobbi Campbell who was the first AIDS Poster Boy in S.F.

Public awareness, especially awareness within the Gay Community, was vital, and Bobbi Campbell devoted and sacrificed his life to save others as one of the original Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. To paraphrase from the vice-presidential debates of eons ago, I say to the current exhibitionists, "I knew Bobbi Campbell, and you are no Bobbi Campbell."

When it came to politics, Bobbi Campbell knew when to remove the bizarre garb for the greater good. See YouTube for his speech shortly before his death outside the Democratic Convention.

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

 

Slideshows