Underworld
Hollywood Bowl, September 9, 2007
By Jonah Flicker
Underworld’s recent appearance at the Hollywood Bowl felt strangely momentous. No devastatingly important events took place onstage. No secrets were revealed. No special guests shocked or awed the crowd. What did occur was an amazing Sunday night show from a veteran electronic act with 15-year-old songs that sound just as urgent today as they did upon their release. The capacity crowd, mostly comprised of O.G. ravers and admirers of ‘90s e-music, clumped together into one writhing organism as songs like the classic, big-synth-undulating “Two Months Off” and selections from their forthcoming album, Oblivion with Bells, filled the night. The passing down of traditions took place as well, as mothers taught their children the age-old ritual of dancing with glow sticks during Underworld’s ebullient set.
The trio’s onstage roles are clearly defined. Karl Hyde is the showman, a ball of energy jumping manically around as he sings and plays guitar, distorting his voice evilly on songs like the steadily-throbbing “Cowgirl.” Rick Smith and Darren Price are the scientists, soberly crafting beats from behind a giant console of knobs and faders. This combination has been the key to Underworld’s crossover success - ravers love them for their meticulous, dark, acid-influenced techno and house, the rest of the world easily latches onto Hyde’s pop vocals and rock inflections. No wonders their Trainspotting anthem, “Born Slippy,” was such a huge hit. The song is actually a frenetic mess of hardcore tribal drums, kept accessible by Hyde’s sung tale of a “lipstick boy.” The crowd lost their shit when the forever-recognizable synth-chord break washed over the party in the aisles. It appears that, twenty years on, Underworld is still one of the most relevant electronic acts to grace the stage.
Paul Oakenfold’s opening set begged the question: why does the biggest DJ in the world need to spoil his already kinda putrid trance with the addition of live instruments? He was joined onstage by tabla, violin, and some kind of lute. If I want lutes, I’ll go to Ren Faire, thank you. I guess they had it all planned out, but I could swear one of the songs morphed into the Deadwood theme song. Oakenfold was all pumping fists and flowing hair, but it just wasn’t working. The crowd seemed mostly content to fill its collective belly with picnic goodies and wine while it waited for the headlining act.
--Jonah Flicker
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mt.laweekly.com/mt-tb.cgi/39909
• Advertisement •
Comments
There are 9 comments posted for this article.
Well said Jonah. It was a fantastic night. Underworld brought in a more holistic aesthetic than the recent Daft Punk show, with wily and wise music. I couldn't help wonder that with 9/11 slowly fading in time that people are ready now for a more thoughtful but equally life-affirming dance experience. I think Underworld represents that.
I was also amazed by how they manipulated our sense of time. About half an hour into the show they played an epic ambient breakbeat track. Gorgeous, mountain-top synths carved the air every now and then as it paced through. It was peaceful, calm, meditative music, pulling us in with quick percussive rhythms underneath, anchoring us as we all reflected.
As for Oakenfold, I'm no fan. But I suppose it was a good move to schedule them together to pull in the maximum crowd, mixing in the smart, older crowd with the new school.
Posted on September 10, 2007 11:55 AM by Thomas Kelley
You got that so right! I sat out that untalented hack and his putrid trance (and the Asian Hotties in Bikinis I heard he paraded across his screen) but Karl Hyde was a wonder in his glittery silver shirt, and there was so much beauty and joy in Underworld's show we were all jumping up and down by the end. I love his laugh, too. Thanks for the post.
Posted on September 10, 2007 12:25 PM by J.L.
My biggest surprise from last night's show was what was blatantly missing: their "hit" song "Underneath the Radar." Any explanation or thoughts as to why they didn't play arguably their most popular song from back in the day? I know they are moving away from the guitar-heavy songs from their nacent days, but that song is what put the on the mapin the irst place. Don't forget your roots! Great show regardless, but would have still been nice to hear "Radar" as well.
Posted on September 10, 2007 12:42 PM by 80's Clubber
Thanks for the comments. I totally forgot to mention the glitter jacket! A highlight of the show, indeed. I think they did play a number of hits ("Born Slippy", for instance, one of their biggest), but seems like maybe they were focusing on newer material? Also, Hyde's guitar playing seemed nominal at best - I could barely hear it... not that it mattered, of course, as the sound and atmosphere they created were pretty wonderful.
Posted on September 10, 2007 1:51 PM by Jonah
I was also shocked by how lackluster Oakey's set was... and how the crowd seemed utterly uninterested. Oakey is fully capable of rocking the house when he's on point... but he seemed to be phoning it in, much like Britney last nite at the VMA's. And to close the set with his ultra-overplayed version of "adagio for strings" was a major cop-out. dude's been spinning that shit for about 10 years now, it seems.
Underworld, as expected, was on fire. My only complaint: I realize it's cool to showcase new material, but to play a FULL HOUR non-stop of unrecognizable tunes, in front of such a huge, clearly rabid crowd of long-time fans? Seemed a bit self-indulgent.
I saw their last tour, in support of their new album at the time "100 days off" and while they played a good amount of new tracks during that tour, they always mixed in hit tracks and anthems.
I think it tested the audience's collective patience, with a full hour of new tunes. Not that they weren't good tunes-- they were, for sure, it's just that an audience NEEDS at least some familiarity to really get their blood flowing.
With that said, once the boys kicked into such classic ass-kickers as "Cowgirl" and "Rez" and "Born Slippy" and "King of Snake", the whole place was going bonkers like I've never seen at the bowl. Truly gorgeous, bombastic, spine-tingling sonic assaults that absolutely delivered the goods.
Those unforgettable synth chords in "Born Slippy" are easily the most iconic sounds in the history of electronica, and when it kicked in, it's like everyone was at church, worshipping the power of the genre.
Hopefully they'll return in a more intimate surrounding... seeing them a few years ago at the Wiltern was mind-blowing, to say the least.
Posted on September 10, 2007 1:51 PM by Jojo
Jonah:
Beautifully written review, however I disagree with your disdain for Oakenfeld. True, his experiment with Carmen Rizzo was a drastic failure of cacophonic proportions, but I thought his grooves where academically authentic and beautifully executed. Great dance music.
I'm not sure what he's doing, but he's the best there is at it. You can check my far less articulate and amatuer review at the LAbuzzBLOG.
Posted on September 10, 2007 10:47 PM by The HEAD
I couldn't agree more, with the slight caveat that the special guests with Oakey (Carmen Rizzo) would have ben infinitely more entertaining had they been given the stage alone, rather than try and bolster the tired tired tired TIRED, and unimaginative Paul Oakenfold. The only thing good about that 8 year old set (I'm quite sure he was playing from an old set) is that I don't have to feel bad about continuing to roast him and those who still like him. As the biggest DJ in the world and a major taste maker, he owes it to himself, his fans, and electronic music in general to evolve. He has enough money and fame to be able to risk alienating those with weak constituions.
Posted on September 11, 2007 9:14 PM by braincloud
have been a huge underworld fans for years and was looking forward to this show for quite a while. oakenfold was predictably disappointing -- he rarely disappoints when it comes to disappointing. but i expected a lot more from underworld. karl hyde was great and full of the energy we'd expect, smith and price did their thing and enjoyed themselves but the set lacked underworld bang. my friends and i seriously thought that the hollywood sound ordinance laws may have curtailed the flurry of beats we anticipated -- who knows? but rez sounded like a wet bag of beats -- even cowgirl did not have the requisite umph. may have been the bowl, may have been the laws, may have been the set design --- but it just wasn't the underworld that i saw 10 years ago.
in disagreement with an earlier comment, i really think that daft punk's set has set the bar too high. the underworld set did not have the same sensory overload and invoke awe in the same way that DP did. i was scurrying to youtube to relive the show afterwards -- we barely even talked about the underworld show while daft punk is like the insane one-night-stand we love to recall every few weeks.
bring on justice before they burn out trying to cross over from distortion to funk.
Posted on September 11, 2007 11:50 PM by em
J-Flo, saw your post as someone sent me a review of the show. But, I usually do not read an author's name. So, I laughed as I realized "Hey, I know that guy!" Wish I knew you were there, we need start again comparing our music show appointment books.
Posted on September 13, 2007 8:31 PM by little brown ring