Most Plastics Leak Harmful Chemicals Into Food, Study Finds

bestbento.jpg
Flickr/adactio

Most plastic items leach chemicals that act like the sex hormone estrogen into food products, even if they don't contain BPA, according to a study in Environmental Health Perspectives, reports NPR. That includes everything from food wraps to water bottles to bento boxes.

Much health concern has focused on BPA, a chemical that mimics estrogen. But the study shows that BPA is just part of the problem. Even though many plastic products are now marketed as "BPA-free," it's unclear whether people are being harmed by BPA or other estrogenic chemicals in plastic. Chemicals having estrogenic activity (EA) reportedly cause many adverse health effects, especially at low doses in babies and children.

For this just-released study, researchers purchased about 450 plastic items from stores including Whole Foods and Walmart, specifically choosing products that come in contact with food, such as deli packaging and baby bottles. Testing showed that "almost all"--more than 95 percent--of the products released estrogenic chemicals, especially when exposed to "stressors" like dishwashers and microwave ovens. In fact, in some cases plastics labeled BPA-free released more chemicals having estrogenic activity than products containing BPA.

The little ray of sunshine, according to the study, is that it is possible to make plastics that don't contaminate food--on a cost-effective, commercial scale--eliminating the "potential health risk posed by most currently available plastic products."

Can we get right on that, please?


My Voice Nation Help
4 comments
Carolyno
Carolyno

Whatever is in the plastics does not appear to be alleviating my menopause symptoms. ;-)

Mike Preston
Mike Preston

Does you not realize that the "study" and the corresponding promotion of that study are being done by the same organization that claims to have solved the problem???

I'm not a trained journalist but I thought reporting "little details" like that was part of the journalistic process. No wonder we all turn to blogs these days.

Kim
Kim

If you actually read the study, you'd realize that the science is legitimate and thoroughly tested and researched, and the "promotion" is what any scientist/organization does when results come in, reporting on the scientific effort to the press, which can decide whether to disseminate the information. In this case, editors from the NIEHS to NPR to Plastics Today have read the study, talked with the scientists, and seen merit in the study and in doing stories on it. Should the organization have just hidden these results away and let people continue to be ignorant of the potential problem? I don't think so.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city