Food Myths Busted With Mensa Member JJ Virgin

Categories: Health

jj virgin.jpg
JJ Virgin, right, on Freaky Eaters
JJ Virgin (shortened due to the unfortunate pronunciation of Julie while living in Japan) is smarter than you. She's a member of Mensa, and she seems to have an addiction to academia. After graduating from UCLA, she went on to graduate school for biomechanics, then sports medicine, then took doctorate-level courses in exercise physiology, nutrition and aging at USC. All in all she's taken more than 40 post-graduate courses that have culminated to make her an expert in weight loss and physical health.

So what kind of career does all this education lead to? Television, of course. Virgin is the co-star of TLC's Freaky Eaters, in which she helps people break their addictions to bizarre foods. She also recently appeared on an episode of Fat Chef and, in May, will appear on an as-yet-unnamed Discovery Fit & Health program.

In addition, Virgin is an author and public speaker and, lucky for us, a private tutor. She believes most Americans don't know food as well as they think they do, and that many of us are making a lot of mistakes when it comes to nutrition. In a sit-down with her, we learned that we're idiots for the granola bar and soy latte we had for breakfast, but that red wine should be part of our weight-loss regime. Plus a few other surprising yet handy bits of food knowledge.* Turn the page for the list.

water glass.jpg
blmurch/Flickr
5. You should drink lots of water, but you should not drink it with meals.
"I tell people to limit their fluid intake to eight ounces with meals because, if you think about it, if you drink a lot of fluid with meals, and if you look at most people over 30 or 35, their digestive enzymes are lower. ... The hydrochloric acid in their stomachs are lower because they're aging and they're stressed. Those are the two things that really lower HCl. Then you get a bunch of water in there and you're going to dilute it further. It doesn't make sense.

"Get up in the morning and have 16 ounces the minute you wake up. Then have another eight to 16 ounces 30 to 60 minutes before a meal, and start drinking an hour after. The most important thing to do is to drink eight ounces before bed, because a study out of the University of Chicago showed that for people with evening hunger pangs, 100% of them shut off their evening hunger pangs with a glass of water."

4. You should eat three square meals, not five or six small ones.
"Look how people eat when they snack. They're not snacking on, say, wild salmon or some Brussels sprouts. It's usually something carb-y. Calories count, but where they come from counts more. Eating something carb-y like a piece of fruit or fruit-sweetened yogurt, or an artificially sweetened yogurt, which is worse, or a granola bar, it's going to drive up your blood sugar, and when you drive up your blood sugar you drive up your insulin, and the message to your body is to store fat and shut off fat-burning.

"If you need to eat less than three to four hours after your last meal, you're doing something wrong."

3. Soy is not a health food.
"No. 1, soy and corn are the two most genetically modified crops out there. Ninety percent of it in the United States is genetically modified. That can mean problems with fertility, G.I. problems, cancer.... GMO is frightening. They've outlawed it in Europe.

"Soy is new to our food supply. It's only 1,000 years old, versus grains, dairy and domesticated animals, which are 5,000 to 10,000 years old. Soy is a phytoestrogen, which might sound good, but for boys, they don't develop like they should, and for girls, they get early periods. For older men, their brains are smaller, so there's higher risk for dementia, and for women, it can trigger some of the more estrogen-dependent cancers. We don't know. The jury's out.

"If you look at soy milk, unless you get the unsweetened kind, which is horrific [tasting], it's sweetened with sugar. Then, to process it, you take soybeans and spin them -- already they've been sprayed with pesticides, and they're 40% fat so they're just little sponges, so they absorb it -- then they spin it in an aluminum cask, so you get some aluminum, then they process it, and usually you end up with some MSG in there, too."

My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
ScientificReview
ScientificReview

THE WHOLE SOY STORY:

Notice that despite JJ Virgin claiming that it's soy not good for women and girls, the phytoestrogen in soy was found to PROTECT girls and women *AGAINST* estrogen dependent cancer!

SOY DOES NOT CAUSE BREAST CANCER, PHYTOESTROGENS AID AGAINST CANCER.

SCIENCE: "Soy Phytoestrogens May Block Estrogen Effects""Plant estrogens found in soy do not increase markers of breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. In fact, they may provide a protective effect."Even at high doses, we found No evidence that the estrogen-like compounds in soy, called isoflavones, stimulate cell growth or other markers for cancer risk in breast tissue."-Charles E. Wood, D.V.M., Ph.D

"The study also suggests that women who have higher levels of estrogen may actually gain a protective effect from higher doses of soy isoflavones.""Population studies show that women who consume diets high in soy generally have lower rates of breast cancer." - Cancer Center.http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...

In other words, the information being given by JJ Virgin could actually inflict breast cancer on girls and women. She is purporting fallacious information that could hurt your wife, daughter, or grandmother, and have them end up with higher risk of cancer. JJ Virgin should be considered incompetent and in fact dangerous, and no person should rely on this person's health based information, as it could cause you potentially lethal damage to your health or to that of your loved ones.

SOY DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER. SOY HELPS *AGAINST* CANCER.ONCOLOGY JOURNAL: "Soy compounds may boost cancer treatment effectiveness: Mouse study" - Radiotherapy & Oncology"Research showed that Soy isoflavones can help make radiation treatment of lung cancer tumours more effective while helping to preserve normal tissue. Isoflavones extracted from soybeans show potential in boosting the effectiveness of cancer treatments. Writing in Radiotherapy and Oncology, researchers report that soy isoflavones enhanced the destruction of lung tumours by radiation, whilst also reducing vascular damage, inflammation and fibrosis caused by radiation injury to normal lung tissue."http://www.nutraingredients-us...

---

This dubious 'nutritionist' JJ Virgin tries to assert that it is soy that causes girls to 'get early periods'.(false). Here's the actual scientific information on this topic:

NEWS: "High meat diet may lead to early puberty for girls"

(PhysOrg.com) -- Increased amounts of meat in children's diets may be part of the reason why girls go through puberty at a much younger age than they did 100 years ago, new research using the Children of the 90s cohort shows. They found that girls who had a higher intake of meat and protein at three and seven were more likely to have started their periods by 12½ years old than girls who ate less meat and protein.

Their report found 49 per cent of girls eating more than 12 portions of meat a week at the age of seven had started their periods by age 12 ½, compared to only 35 per cent of those who ate less than four portions of meat a week.

Dr Rogers, a senior lecturer at the University of Brighton's School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, said there was evidence that girls who start their periods early were at higher risk of a number of diseases including breast cancer, ovarian cancer and heart disease. This work suggests that a girl's diet in early childhood may affect her risk of suffering from these diseases as an adult.

http://www.physorg.com/news195...

Here's another thing you're not being told: When you cook meat, not soy, meat protein produces a chemical known as Heterocyclic Amines. or HCAs. These are carcinogenic. HCAs are classified as a class 1 carcinogen. When you grill or barbeque meat, the creatinine reacts and produces carcinogenic material. Soy does not have creatinine in it. Nor does any plant. So vegetarians do not have this problem. In other words, as soon as you cook meat or hamburger, or steak, it produces carcinogenic Heterocyclic Amines. This is one reason red meat is linked to Throat Cancer, Esophagus Cancer, Stomach Cancer, Intestinal Cancer, Rectal Cancer, and Anus Cancer. A man eating steak can end up with tumours around the rear end and up inside his seat, from eating steaks.

The primary carcinogenic Heterocyclic Amines (HCAs) detected in meat were :2-amino-3-methyl-imidazo [4,5-f]quinoline (I2Q), 2-amino-3-methylimidazo [4,5-f]quinoxaline (I2Qx), 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo [4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeI2Qx), and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP)

1 of these Heterocyclic Amines only found in meat is called "PhiP". PhIP is ESTROGENIC! It is Effeminizing.

A man eating meat and steak, especially a man or boy who grilled it over a barbeque, thinking it was 'manly' has just been emasculating themselves. Barbequed chicken, grilled fish, BBQ brisket, and steak and red meat contain an effeminizing compound called PhIP. It acts like female estrogen. So a man eating the tofu or soy would NOT be getting feminized, however the boy who was fed a lot of meat, especially grilled meat, chicken ,fish, etc, now has been getting a dose of feminizing estrogenic chemicals soaked in the juices of every piece of meat ingested.

DON'T THINK SO? THEN READ THIS:

http://www.sciencenews.org/vie...

"Researchers find that a chemical that forms in cooked meat, especially charred portions, is a potent mimic of estrogen, the primary female sex hormone".

Men eating meat are eating chemicals that act like female sex hormones. Grilled plant protein does not form this, so the man eating the tofu or soy, and vegetarians, do not have this problem. The meat eater over time, may grow more effeminate.

This nutritionist not only gave you the wrong information, but neglected and failed to tell you their information on soy was part of an internet hoax, and the exact opposite is true.

Still being duped by the myth? Saw some post on some bodybuilding chat-board by someone who was duped? Well once again, here is the info straight from a masculine bodybuilding magazine itself on the subject:

IRONMAN BODYBUILDING MAGAZINE: "Researchers confirm soy has No effect on testosterone"

Soy doesn't increase estrogen, soy phytoestrogen isoflavones BLOCK estrogen from affecting men.

"Since the soy isoflavones are so weak, they block the effects of estrogen." 15 placebo-controlled studies and 32 reports on 36 treatment groups once-and-for-all confirmed that soy protein or isoflavone intake had no significant effects on testosterone.

The Soy is bad, soy is evil, myth is not only debunked, soy is actually beneficial.

Soy helped reduce fat. Helped in fatloss and weight-loss. Built protein & muscle.

"Soy protein seems to be particularly potent in reducing fat stored in muscle."

Soy now shown excellent for bodybuilding.-Ironman Bodybuilding Magazine.

"If anything, soy’s moderate effect on cortisol would be good for those engaged in bodybuilding."

(Note: it's not even appropriate to avoid it just to be 'playing it safe', because those who are Not eating soy, will be be more affected by the Estrogen in steak and meat. Men who eat Soy will have less estrogenic effects than meat eaters. Plus soy protects men against prostate cancers, and reduces fat in muscle making it excellent for bodybuilding.) - IRONMAN BODYBUILDING MAGAZINE.

http://imbodybuilding.com/arti...IRONMAN BODYBUILDING MAGAZINE.

--

THE SOY MYTH IS A KNOWN INTERNET HOAX:

So where did all the bogus soy information come from? The soy estrogen myth arose from an extremist front-group called the WAPF whose members have been cited by U.S. Federal Authorities for dispensing false and/or misleading health and medical information. This is the information that just got posted to you by JJ Virgin, who just regurgitated potentially dangerous and false nutritional information to you in this article. Please be informed as follows:

The Soy Contains Estrogen false myth is a hoax piece that was concocted by a known front-group identified as the "WAPF" a.k.a. The Weston A. Price Foundation, a group that posts false and misleading health information which can potentially lead to health damage.

WITNESS THE GUARDIAN NEWS: 

Article: "Soy Scaremongering"LONDON - "Most anti-soya stories can be traced back to one single group in the US called the Weston A Price Foundation (WAPF)..a US-based Fringe Organisation.. bent on citing scientifically flawed studies to promote their own agenda and has influenced a vast number of consumers, duping them"

"There were more than 40 scientific inaccuracies in the [WESTON PRICE] article, including the direct misquoting of scientific studies."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm...

Another individual caught pushing the false "soy myth" is identified as "Dr. Joseph Mercola" of of the quack supplement site known as articles.Mercola.com. Mercola also spreads the anti-soy hoax. Mercola is also an "honorary board-member" of the WAPF. Dr. Joseph Mercola has now been cited by FEDERAL AUTHORITIES for making fallacious health and/or medical product claims.

In other words, members of the WAPF, have been under investigation and have been cited for health and medical claim violations by enforcement authorities in the United States of America.

Here is an exact example of "Dr. Joseph Mercola" wherein this individual was caught making false claims not backed by scientific evidence and hit by federal authorities with a FEDERAL CITATION for making false health & medical product claims. Mercola spreads false articles on blogs, websites, syndicated blog feeds, and is sometimes picked up by Mens Health, and other lesser-educated magazines, quack diet blogs such as paleo diet and less-educated bodybuilding or 'fitness' sites that do not know that the Soy Myth and WAPF's articles and claims are dubious.

Federal Case Ref. No. CL-04-HFS-810-134 AGAINST JOSEPH MERCOLA OF THE WESTON A. PRICE FOUNDATION:

LOOK:http://www.casewatch.org/fdawa...

Joseph Mercola of Mercola Health Resources, and an honorary member of the WAPF who also spreads the soy estrogen myth has also had his Business Accreditation revoked by the BETTER BUSINES BUREAU.

http://www.bbb.org/chicago/new...

MERCOLA, who is a known pusher of the fake information on tofu, etc, has a rating of "F" (Fail), currently from the BBB, due to excessive customer complaints and reports of Mercola.com not properly treating their customers. Mercola often generates articles in order to sell people on the idea that they need to purchase supplements. By coincidence, Mercola just happens to sell those very pills, and is happy to sell them to you. When they don't work, and customers find out information in the articles was false as well, this has resulted in masses of customer complaints filed against Mercola, and has generated the F RATING from the U.S. Better Business Bureau.

http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/Enfor...

NOTE: THE ABOVE IS AN OFFICIAL U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ENFORCEMENT SITE WITH INFORMATION ON WESTON PRICE SOY MYTH SPREADER JOSEPH MERCOLA.

This one reveals yet another violation by Joseph Mercola for other health claims besides soy. He has been involved in not just one, but multiple health claim violations.

And if that wasn't enough. Witness that now that you know that the soy estrogen myth is debunked and that soy does not contain estrogen, let's see what DOES actually contain the human-dangerous form of mammalian estrogen:

MEAT. Meat contains volumes of actual human-effective form feminine estrogen. Dont think so? Go look.

Witness this fact at this image from Jeffers Livestock showing that beef is soaked with female mammalian estrogen:http://img848.imageshack.us/im...

IT IS STEAK & MEAT THAT POTENTIALLY CONTAIN THE ACTUAL FORM OF ESTROGEN DANGEROUS TO BOYS AND MEN.

In that direct image, you see a Cattle Farmer supply provider. They are selling Estradiol. Estradiol is Estrogen. That is concentrated 17-Beta-Estradiol, the type of feminine estrogen that can emasculate and effeminize a boy and cause pre-puberty genital damage. Why is it there on a site to be purchased by cattle farmers? Because meat farmers buy it, and inject it into 99% of all meat. They use it to pump up their cows so that they weigh more and they sell their cattle by the pound. So that steak you've been eating largely has been soaked with feminizing hormone juices. Oh, and they don't go away due to cooking. They remain potent. There are no ampules of 20mg Estradiol being injected into tofu, so the man who ate the tofu had estrogen blocked, and more male testosterone, while the man who thought meat was more manly instead, got double-dosed with meat-hormones, plus effeminizing PhIP when he grilled it.

Please note, that anyone tempted to blurt out something about 'grassfed meat' being ok, would also be wrong. So you can save yourself from posting it. The specifications for the labeling grassfed beef say Nothing about not having Synovex-S or estradiol and female growth hormones in it. If you thought you were eating grass fed beef and you were safe, realise that you have this entire time been potentially ingesting hormones. Grass fed doesn't mean hormone free. Oh, and if you are tempted to say you only eat meat that is organic and certified hormone free, remember, estrogenic PhIP forms in that too. In other words, even organic, grass fed, hormone free meat is potentially estrogenic.

Oh, and by the way, THIS (correct) information is coming from a Mensa member with an IQ above that of the self-proclaimed one JJ Virgin above. One that will be contacting the group in order to disavow and revoke the attribution of the aforementioned and report this breach of proper scientific info to not only that organization, but also to have her nutrition certification reviewed and revoked, and will be informing the showrunners and contacts of the various TV shows with regard to their liability for espousing her potentially dangerous and false information. And yours truly and the others here are obviously Not the only ones who know that JJ Virgin has committed a breach of the facts in her issuances, because this very article, by its very own author, from LA WEEKLY has indeed written the following about JJ Virgin's claims as well:

--> *"This is the truth according to JJ Virgin and is not necessarily being presented as fact by LA Weekly."

Do you see that statement? That's written by LA WEEKLY and the author of this very article. Saying that they have put an "asterisk" on her claims in this very article and are disavowing any association with whether her statements are factual or not. So if you are a reader of this paper, even this paper itself has detected that this so-called 'nutritionist' has indeed posted dubious, potentially fake, and questionable information.

The Soy Myth is false, and indeed was fabricated by a group called the WAPF whose members have been in fact cited by U.S. FEDERAL AUTHORITES for posting false health claims. Soy turned out to be ok. The same can't be said for this deposed self-proclaimed TV nutritionist who just tried to dupe all of you with false information that could actually hurt you and your loved ones.

 

ScientificReview
ScientificReview

ALERT TO ALL READERS: The information in this Article is False.

The information being presented as the "answers" by the individual identifying themselves as "JJ Virgin" and purporting to 'bust myths', contains fallacious health information. Including some  scam info.

Here is an example: They Soy-Estrogen Myth ScamThe Soy information presented as the supposed 'answer!' by the purported "Julie J Virgin" is false and has been traced to a scam frontgroup called the WAPF. The WAPF is a scam group that spreads fallacious and dangerous health and medical information that is harmful to your health and to that of your child.

For instance, one of the myths spread by the WAPF and spread here by JJ Virgin who has eithe been duped by it, or is intentionally posting false information, is that soy contains estrogen(false), or that soy phytoestrogens are 'bad for boys'(wrong). This is an internet hoax spread by the fringe group WAPF. Here is the actual information:

SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE: SOY DOES NOT HAVE FEMINIZING EFFECTS ON MEN - VERIFIED

ANALYSIS: "Soybean isoflavone exposure does not have feminizing effects on men" - NIH National Institute of Health"Neither isoflavone supplements nor isoflavone-rich soy affect total or free testosterone levels. Clinical evidence also indicates that isoflavones have no effect on sperm. There is essentially no evidence from the nine identified clinical studies that soy isoflavone exposure affects estrogen levels in men."http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...

In other words, the supposed 'myth-busting answer' posted by "JJ Virgin" is scientifically fallacious. It is a known health hoax, which was doctored up by a nutritional scam group identified as the "Weston A. Price Foundation" that spreads information known to be based on pseudo-science in order to dupe and hurt users, including you and your family. This myth has been spread in many places, and so much that many have 'parroted' it. It is fallacious. One more time, witness the actual scientific information, not the false information in the "TV hosts" quackery:

LABORATORY TESTS REVEAL SOY ESTROGEN MYTH IS A HOAX [CONFIRMED]

PUBMED JOURNAL: "Clinical studies show no effects of soy protein or isoflavones on reproductive hormones in men""32 reports involving 36 treatment groups and 15 placebo-controlled treatment groups with baseline and ending measures involving soy, isoflavones, genistein, phytoestrogens, red clover, androgens, testosterone, and SHBG, were analyzed. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis found that neither soy foods nore soy isoflavone supplements alter measures of bioavailable Testosterone concentrations in men. There was no effect.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...

JJ Virgin has either unintentionally or intentionally tried to assert the false "soy boys" myth which is scientifically fallacious, debunked, and traced to a false scam group. This means that if unintentional, JJ Virgin is not properly informed on the correct nutritional science and therefore is not properly qualified or competent to be providing 'answers', busting myths, or even practicing nutritional cosultations because this individual is unqualified on the topic and in fact has just been effectively duped into spreading a fake myth. On the other hand, if JJ Virgin claims to BE entirely competent on the subject, then what that means, is JJ Virgin knows it's fallacious, and is willfully pushing known fallacious information to you and the public anyway. If JJ Virgin makes the claim that they know the subject, that means JJ Virgin is engaged in health fraud and should be reported to the authorities for improper conduct because they know it's incorrect and spread it anyway, which means they are complicit.

Read the soy myth on some other place too, and still unsure? Here. Once again, this soy myth is entirely fallacious no matter how many 'blogs' or unwitting chat boards you see this myth on:

METASTUDY: REVIEW OF OVER 15 STUDIES SHOW NO ESTROGENIC EFFECT OF SOY ON MEN'S TESTOSTERONE

SCIENCE: "Review finds NO Effect of soy on testosterone" - METAREVIEW STUDYDespite rumours often spread on the internet, "A review of 15 studies into the influence of soy proteins or isoflavones on male hormones has found No evidence of an estrogen-like effect." These rumours stemmed from a handful of flawed reports. "The authors criticized the studies that reported lowered testosterone levels for their methodology." One of them had only 12 subjects in it. In another, the researchers forgot to include a control, and final readings, rendering their results useless. In another one the entire result was due to just 1 subject. The soy scares were based on this flawed science. It was actually found that Soy does not cause breast cancer, protstate cancer, thyroid problems, infant formula problems, or estrogenic effects, on the contrary "Eating soy demonstrated protection against breast cancer, prostate cancer, and heart disease." Eating Soy was confirmed benficial. For women, children, and indeed men.http://www.foodnavigator.com/S...

Watch for this Soy myth popping up in the vicinity of individuals or sites advocating meat, as the WAPF extremist front group that concocted it, was found connected to several meat farmers and was spread because soy or tofu sales were decreasing their sales of beef and meat. Here is a point of information. Guess what these same farmers feed their cattle. Yes, that's correct. Corn and Soy. So watch for the same individual spreading the myth to avoid soy and then either recommending quantities of meat, or simply neglecting to mention to avoid red meat. Why? Because this same soy is in meat. Keep in mind, a human eating tofu or soy would only be eating the amount in the serving, but that cow eats much more than fits in a human mouth. In fact, that cow is eating upwards of 50 times the amount of feed (containing the same soy) in 1 day. So at this point, meat would have 50-x MORE soy in it. But wait, it doesn't stop there. A cow is raised for 3 to 4 years before it is slaughtered for meat. Let's say 1000 days. This means that cow has eaten 50x the amount consumed by a human, each day, every day, for 1000 days. That means MEAT contains 50-THOUSAND times the amount of material coming from soy. Because it has been eating it for 3 years in its feed. In other words, lets "pretend" for 1 minute that soy contained something bad, by just eating the tofu or soy, a boy or man eating the tofu or soy would be getting 1/50,000th of a dose of whatever you believe is in there, but if the boy or man eats beef or steak, the item that these same quack-nutritionists are often seen also recommending instead, that boy or man is now receiving an effective dose of over 50-THOUSAND TIMES of whatever you think is in soy, by eating that cow. Because that same farmer has been feeding that cow 25 to 50 POUNDS of cattle feed containing soy, and it's been eating that poundage over a thousand times in a thousand days. So if you (mistakenly) still believe there's something in soy, you'd be getting 1/50,000th of it by eating the soy compared to meat, and by eating pieces of meat a boy or male would be ingesting 50,000 times the potency of whatever you believe is in there.

The same idea goes for GMO. This nutritional farce "JJ Virgin" comes out of the gate with remarks about things being GMO, or genetically modified. Well, if that's the case, and GMO is so damaging, then JJ Virgin will be astounded to learn that virtually all of the NON-GMO soy is what is sold for HUMANS. In other words, it's the NON-GMO, natural, original soya which is mainly in supermarkets, used for tofu, used in soyfoods for human consumption. Guess where most of the GMO soy goes...cow feed. Virtually all of the actual genetically modified soy is sold as cattle feed. This means one more time that by eating soy itself, a woman, man, boy or girl eating tofu would most likely be getting the original healthy natural version. But the person who decided not to eat the soy and then replaced it with a burger or meat, is now consuming huge loads of meat which has been generated from genetic modification. In fact, beef itself is genetically modified. If you're eating the soy, you're most likely eating the natural plant version. If you ate steak, that big juicy steak is rife with and composed of GMO feed, including exactly those things that JJ Virgin attempts to say is 'bad'. Yet no mention of that to you here. Think about it, again, if you are 'scared' by GMO, it's Tofu in the supermarket that is what's not GMO, and even if it was, eating meat instead would contain a dose of 50-thousand times whatever you think GMO foods will do to you.

Here's another problem. JJ Virgin attempts to use the false "only invented 10,000 years ago" line. This is false. This is false information traced to the now known debunked "paleo diet" or caveman diet scam. Keep in mind that the paleo diet was found to be deficient and rated unhealthy by Health Experts. In fact, a panel of dozens of Certified Professional Nutritionists and Medical Doctors evaluated a bank of over 20+ diets, from Atkins to Vegan to Vegatarian, to the DASH diet, WeightWatchers, The Zone Diet, Lowcarb diets, etc. and where did the Caveman diet rank? LAST. Yes, the Paleo Diet was ranked a failure, and in last place out of all of the current diets reviewed and came in 20th out of 20. The defunct Atkins Diet came in 2nd to last. (Remember: Dr. Robert Atkins told people to eat low carb and eat loads of fat and meat and you'd lose weight an it would be good for your heart. Atkins is now dead. Dr. Robert Atkins autopsy showed damage to his heart. And Atkins died obese. Yes, the inventor of the lowcarb atkins diet was fat. And he died when he slipped on his porch and hit his head on the steps. The coroner found evidence of a stroke, so it is likely Atkins had a stroke, fell and hit his head, and is now dead. Atkins Nutritionals has since even retracted its recommendations that people emphasize saturated fat and high meat protein diets. And if you haven't heard yet, that the lowcarb diet is on its way to the grave, put "Atkins Bankrupt" in google or any search engine and you will see that the Atkins company filed for bankruptcy. Many people still have no idea that the inventor of the Lowcarb Atkins diet is dead, had heart disease, and that the lowcarb diet company filed for bankruptcy.)

Now, imagine what could rank worse than that. The Paleo Diet managed to do it. The reason is because the Paleo Diet was found to be based on pseudo-science. This is where the proponents concoct and fabricate information that 'seems likely' but is a scam to dupe the public. Fake material is purported and made to appear 'scientific-looking' such that many people are fooled by it and believe it. For example, one of the MAIN founding principles underlying the main idea of the paleo diet is the myth that mankind didn't eat grains, and that man only started eating grains 10,000 years ago. You see this parroted above by JJ Virgin. This is false. Not 1 of the main paleolithic diet authors is a real paleontologist. Yes, that is correct. The people who came up with the supposed diet that was purported to be eaten by primitive man, turned out to be invented by essentially fitness trainers and a gym teacher not even certified in Paleontology whatsoever, and had never been on an authenticated scientific archeological dig. Loren Cordain turned out to be not a Medical Doctor. Not an M.D. He is not authorized to make medical recommendations. He put "Doctor" on the front of his name because he got a PhD degree and that is what let him use the appelation 'doctor'. What's his PhD in? PaleoAntropology? No. "Exercise". Yes. The PhD degree of the originator of the paleo diet books merely has a degree in jogging and book fitness. Essentially a Phys Ed, or gym teacher. Yet he purported to know all about the diets of ancient paleolithic skeletons unearthed in archeological digs that he had never been on. It's the same paleo diet that came up with the false "10,000" years ago hypothesis burped up by JJ Virgin here regarding grains and corn and soy. The founding principle of the Paleo Diet is that they tell you not to eat grains because cavemen didn't eat grains, and they only started to be eaten 10 thousand years ago...this has all been found to be scientifically bunk.

Witness the following ACTUAL Paleolithic  information:

NEWS: "30,000-Year-Old Flour Finding Suggests Cavemen Craved Carbs"Tue 19 Oct 10 from Livescience"The newfound discovery of the oldest flour in the world suggests cavemen who were thought to live almost entirely on meat may have had a different diet than was thought."http://www.livescience.com/tec...

NEWS: "30,000 year-old flour production in Europe"Mon 18 Oct 10 from USA today"Archeologists have found evidence that Paleolithic humans were making flour in Europe 30,000 years ago."http://content.usatoday.com/co...

NEWS: "Study: Bread was in Stone Age diets"Mon 18 Oct 10 from UPI"FLORENCE, Italy, Oct. 18 (UPI) -- The idea that our ancient hunter-gatherer ancestors lived on low-carb meat diets is wrong, Italian researchers say -- they liked their daily bread, too."http://www.upi.com/Science_New...

NEWS: "Humans feasting on grains for more than 105,000 years" "Science unveiling their discovery in Mozambique of stone tools with thousands of wild grain residues on them dated to 105,000 years ago""Grains might have been an important part of human diets much further back in our history than previous research has suggested."- SCIENTIFIC AMERICANhttp://blogs.scientificamerica...

http://www.sciencenewsdaily.or...

Ok? Got it? The founding principle of the paleo diet is don't eat grains and carbs or bread, because caveman didn't have it, didn't eat it, and it only came after 10,000 years ago with the 'advent of agriculture' and somehow that means you shouldn't eat it--ALL SCIENTIFICALLY FALSE. Well, unlike the gym teachers and fitness trainers trying to tell you this and sell their kook diet books, actual professional archeologists found grains right in the teeth of unearthed skeletons. It means the entire Paleo Diet is false. It is now certified as a quack diet and although plenty of remaining 'true believers' like bigfoot and ghost-hunting, it 'appears' scientific-looking, but is scientifically fallacious.

Here's a case in point. JJ Virgin, and along with Paleo diet pushers raise this 10,000 years ago false line, and use it to say you shouldn't eat anything that a caveman didn't eat, and don't eat anything that was created by agriculture or sooner than this 10,000 years ago. Then they'll turn around and recommend black angus beef (often using the word grassfed in there as well, watch for that one). Well, here's the problem. Black Angus cows did not exist 10,000 years ago. oops.

Black Angus beef was genetically bred. It was created merely in the 1800's. In the UK. There was No black angus beef steak in Africa, especially hundreds of thousands of years ago. Black Angus beef steak was genetically bred, by cattle farmers, nevermind this 1000 years ago that the dubious nutritionist JJ Virgin is burping up about soy, this beef was genetically bred only 170 years ago!

BLACK ANGUS CATTLE ARE GENETICALLY BRED AND ONLY AROSE IN 1842!Hugh Watson can be considered the founder of the breed; he was instrumental in selecting the best black, polled animals for his herd. His favorite bull was Old Jock, who was born 1842 and sired by Grey-Breasted Jock. Grey-Breasted Jock was given the number "1" in the Scottish Herd Book when it was founded.

BLACK ANGUS COWS AREN'T NATURAL, THEY ARE CONSIDERED GENETIC FREAKS:"On May 17, 1873, George Grant brought four Angus bulls, but unfortunately no cows, to Victoria, Kansas. He took the bulls to the fair in Kansas City where they were the topic of much conversation...The black hornless animals were often called "freaks" by those who saw them."

RED ANGUS COWS ARE GENETICALLY RECESSIVE, THE MEAT IS NOT DOMINANT:Red Angus cattle occur as the result of a recessive gene. Breeders collecting red cattle from black herds began the Red Angus Association of America in 1954.

So this nutritionist is pushing that you shouldn't eat anything genetically bred, and you should beware of eating something 'only' created 1000 years ago(which is also wrong), and then neglects to mention that Black Angus beef would be 'dangerous' according to this metric. In fact, it was genetically bred, and only arose 170 years ago! So wheres the scare information on burgers, and steaks, barbeque, and meat? According to this myth-spreading nutritionist, its even worse. Yet no mention of this.

AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: SOY HAS NO ESTROGEN, SOY ESTROGEN MYTH IS AN UN-SCIENTIFIC HOAX.

AICR: "Men Don't Need to Fear Soy Foods" -American Institute for Cancer ResearchIt’s no wonder that men who have read the recent stories circulating about soy are confused. Some stories claim that soy foods, such as tofu and soy milk, can lead to breast growth or reduce testosterone levels. Fears that the amount of phytoestrogens in moderate amounts of soy foods could stimulate men’s breast tissue or reduce their testosterone are not based on sound research. A study of children fed soy protein formula for more than six months showed no hormonal effects. A study of men found that the men who ate soy foods twice a day for three months showed NO change in testosterone levels. Soy does not cause prostate cancer, on the contrary, the studies showed eating soy by men was beneficial in lowering the risk of prostate cancer. Men can feel safe.http://www.foodconsumer.org/ne...

But here's the thing. As it turns out, not only does soy NOT contain estrogen, and not only does the phytoestrogen not have any effect on boys or men, but the phytoestrogen in soy actually has been found to BLOCK the harmful estrogen. This 'nutritionist' fails to tell you that.

SCIENCE: NOT ONLY DOES SOY *NOT* CONTAIN ESTROGEN, SOY *BLOCKS* ESTROGEN

SCIENCE NEWS: "Soy Phytoestrogens May Block Estrogen Effects""Isoflavones may protect against the more powerful estrogen produced by the body." "The addition of high levels of dietary soy isoflavones tended to block estrogen." -Senior investigator J. Mark Cline, D.V.M., Ph.D.http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...

In other words, phytoestrogen is the PLANT form! It is not the mammalian form that affects animals. Its for plants. Soy is a plant. Not a mammal. Soy Phytoestrogen is NOT the same as animal form mammalian estrogen. It's akin to saying you could use an Artichoke Heart as a transplant into a human who needed an organ transplant. What happens is that the non-identical phytoestrogen molecule can 'fit' in and BLOCK the real estrogen from getting into your own receptor. The phytoestrogen in soy does not have the same effect as REAL HUMAN ESTROGEN. It is merely a similar shape, so what happens is that the phytoestrogen can actually get into and block the real active estrogen from entering the receptor site in your body. It means that a man who eats soy would actually get LESS estrogen! Not more. It has exactly the opposite effect being told to you here. Soy protects you against the real estrogen. Soy blocks estrogen. In fact this is why vegetarians and vegans actually were found to have MORE Testosterone than meat-eating men:

NEWS: VEGANS HAD *MORE* TESTOSTERONE THAN OMNIVORES. VEGANS HAD 23% HIGHER SHBG. AND NO STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OMNIVORES & VEGANS IN FREE T OR E2

British Journal of NutritionHormones and Metabolism    * British Journal of Nutrition (1990), 64 : pp 111-119    * Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1990    * DOI: 10.1079/BJN19900014 (About DOI)    * Published online: 09 March 2007

TITLE:Testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, calculated free testosterone, and oestradiol in male vegans and omnivores

AUTHORS:Timothy J. A. Keya1, Liane Roea2, Margaret Thorogooda2, John W. Moorea3, Graham M. G. Clarka3 and Dennis Y. Wanga3a1 Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HEa2 General Practice Research Group, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Department of Community Medicine & General Practice, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HEa3 Clinical Endocrinology Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, PO Box 123, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX

Abstract:Total testosterone (T), total oestradiol (E2) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations were measured in plasma samples from fifty-one male vegans and fifty-seven omnivores of similar age. Free T concentration was estimated by calculation, in comparison with the omnivores, the vegans had 7% higher total T (P = 0.250), 23% higher SHBG (P = 0.001), 3% lower free T (P = 0.580), and 11% higher E2 (P = 0.194). In a subset of eighteen vegans and twenty-two omnivores for whom 4 d diet records were available, there were statistically significant correlations between T and polyunsaturated fatty acids (r 0.37), SHBG and fat (r 0.43 for total fat, 0.46 for saturated fatty acids and 0.33 for polyunsaturated fatty acids), and SHBG and alcohol (r–0.39). It is concluded that a vegan diet causes a substantial increase in SHBG but has little effect on total or free T or on E2.

http://journals.cambridge.org/...

In case you didn't see this, it shows that vegetarians and vegans (potentially eating more soy and no meat at all) actually tested HIGHER in Testosterone! Vegans beat Meat-Eaters and Omnivores in Testosterone.And were also higher beneficial SHBG.

In other words, not only does soy NOT contain estrogen, and not only is the 'soy-boys' scare info posted by this quack nutritionist falsified, soy actually BLOCKS real estrogen and a boy eating meat would have MORE ESTROGEN and potentially less testosterone, and the boy or man eating tofu actually tested to have more manly testosterone. This is why this information and Junk-science from this article spread by JJ Virgin who gleaned it from this WAPF nutritional scam group is highly deceptive.

The Bug
The Bug like.author.displayName 1 Like

WOW - digesting this article is in fact unhealthy for your brain. If this woman (who calls herself JJ Virgin) is a member of Mensa, we're all in trouble. How can anything that's 1000 years old be considered new? Her views on GMO's are the only thing that's horriffic about this; she dismisses countless, credible, peer reviewed scientific facts and other reports that declare the technology's safety. Her real intent is probably to fuel her psuedo-celebrity status. "That can mean problems with fertility, G.I. problems, cancer...GMO is frightening. They've outlawed it in Europe." C'mon, show us the evidence Ms non-Mensa.

Lola
Lola

Hmm. I live in the UK, so in case anyone is interested in how GM foods are controlled in the EU, here's this:http://www.defra.gov.uk/enviro...

It's actually not outlawed, but seems to be more tightly regulated here than it is in the States. It would seem we still have plenty of imports though.

As for Virgin's qualifications, is she a PhD? I am not arguing that she hasn't taken a lot of graduate courses, but it doesn't say anywhere what her qualifications are, aside from being a MENSA member.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city