Do We Really Want The Michelin Guide Back In Los Angeles?

Categories: Food Guides

michelin-guide.jpg
Michelin
Historical Michelin tire ad
The Michelin Guide released their New York rankings yesterday, with the usual fanfare and oohhing and aahhing about who got stars, how many they got, and what that means for the cultural validity of the city's dining scene.

For Los Angeles, this time of year might sting a little, bringing up the fact that we no longer get Michelin ratings after the company decided to "suspend" their guides here in 2009. Chefs especially seem to feel jipped that Michelin doesn't take their efforts into consideration. We've heard many chefs complain that Michelin ought to come back to L.A. When the rankings came out yesterday, Michael Voltaggio tweeted "who thinks its time for @MichelinGuideNY to come back to LA?"

But perhaps we shouldn't fret. Today, Vanity Fair published a devastating piece by A. A. Gill, with the basic opinion that the Michelin Guide had ruined French food and is doing no better for New York. If you love a good take down this story is worth reading for its vicious prose alone:

Food writing is already the recidivist culprit of multiple sins against both language and digestion, but the little encomiums of the Michelin guide effortlessly lick the bottom of the descriptive swill bucket. Take this, for instance, but only if you have a paper bag close at hand: "Can something be too perfect? Can its focus be so singular, pleasure so complete, and technique so flawless that creativity suffers? Per Se proves that this fear is unfounded." That was written in chocolate saliva. Or this: "Devout foodies are quieting their delirium of joy at having scored a reservation--everyone and everything here is living up to the honor of adoring this extraordinary restaurant ... Uni with truffle-oil gelée and brioche expresses the regret that we have but three stars to give." That's not a review of Chef's Table at Brooklyn Fare--it's a handjob.

We might also do well to remember that when Michelin was in L.A., it was roundly criticized by the home-town food writers. Some of those criticisms almost match Gill's in the scathing nature of their disappointment.

So, what good would the guide do us back here in L.A.? And why do chefs want it so badly? Is it because, as Gill says, "Craving the love and the approbation of a stern parent, chefs yearned for the Michelin stars"? Is there any benefit to the public?

Los Angeles yearns to be taken seriously as a dining town, but perhaps this is one mark of approval we simply don't need.


Want more Squid Ink? Follow us on Twitter or like us on Facebook.

My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
theocanada
theocanada

There are no 3 star restaurants in LA as it currently stands. Not only in a literal "the last time the guide was published the highest any restaurant got was 2" sense but also that LA restaurants dont play at the same level of service. LA's very best have food that rivals NYC but no one in LA has service that rivals the service at the best in NYC. It's a completely different dining experience. 

joey_stilson
joey_stilson

Why not bring the guide back to L.A.??? I think the race for more stars among fine dining restaurants here might do something good for the advancment of culinary arts and the growth of the fine dining scene.

 It may also bring recognition to restaurants who may not otherwise have any recognition at all.

 I agree with @romeo I would take the guide advice over yelp or tripadvisor any day.

romeo
romeo

i would take michelin guide advice and reviews over those morons at yelp any day.

ArtsBeatLA
ArtsBeatLA

re @TheHungryClown @LAWeeklyFood @BeshaRodell You folks are comfortable using the word "jipped" (gypped, jypped, etc.)?

 

Yeah, not a lot of people realize this is a racial slur.  "ripped off" is a more acceptable term.

samkimsamkim
samkimsamkim

@MyLastBite @BeshaRodell @LAWeeklyFood Why not? It's for tourists. The kind of tourists that spend $$$ on hotel, transportation, food.

TheHungryClown
TheHungryClown

@LAWeeklyFood @BeshaRodell You folks are comfortable using the word "jipped" (gypped, jypped, etc.)?

lushangeles
lushangeles

Let's play the hypothetical game then, who would you *want* Michelin to honor with as 3- and 2-stars?  Urasawa?  Providence?  Craft?

Andrew
Andrew

It would certainly be nice. The books are fun to read, and often mention places that fly under the radar for far too long. Maybe some chefs (and even more ridiculously, fans) will be offended for a restaurant not to be included or have lesser stars than they'd like, but if they are reacting emotionally to it so seriously, what does that say? > they feel the book is important.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city