Ruhlman Asks: Is It OK For Food Writers To Express Political Opinion?

food-politics.jpg
LaMenta3 via flickrtd>
Political lunch boxes
On his blog today, Michael Ruhlman asks, "Is it justifiable for me, known and read primarily for writing about food, cooking, and the work of the professional kitchen, to voice my opinion on a matter unrelated to food?" The blog post, titled "Vote! (a question to readers & a free signed Ruhlman's 20)," comes four years after Ruhlman posted about the last presidential election with a post titled "Vote Obama." Ruhlman now says he thinks he was wrong to write that post, because no one should tell anyone else how to vote. But he does wonder if it's fair for food writers to express their opinions on things that don't directly relate to food. He goes on to say "I wonder is there anything unrelated to food?"

He's gotten some interesting responses, both in the comments section of the blog and on Twitter. Bilbo Douchebaggins (nice name) says "A food writer is also a citizen, as is a mailman, doctor, pilot, etc. So yes, you have the right (and moral duty?) to express your political opinions as a citizen of your country." P Lindsley says "While I value your opinion, and believe you have the right to share it any way you choose, I don't want to hear your political views. I follow you because you are an expert in food and cooking. I am a fan because of topic specific information, reviews, ideas, and sound culinary judgment...When I follow you, I want to escape news, politics, and religious debates, I want to hear and learn about food." Seattle Weekly's Hanna Raskin tweets "How many political opinions don't pertain to how we eat, what we eat or whether we eat at all?"

This, in many ways, gets to the heart of the question. Many of us who are food writers got into our line of work because we see food as a lens through which to see life. Love, family, health, spirituality, and yes, politics. Ruhlman may be right that posting a "Vote Obama" editorial on a food blog may be taking it a bit far (although it is his blog and as far as I'm concerned he can do what he damn well pleases there), but when you think about the Farm Bill, Prop 37, issues of hunger and the environment, it's awfully hard to separate politics from what we eat. Admittedly, reporting on these aspects of food is different than expressing an opinion. What do you think?

See also:
Read This Now: Michael Ruhlman on Food Writing
Get Out the Vote: Proposition 37, California's GMO Labeling Initiative, Could Mean Change for the Entire Country


Want more Squid Ink? Follow us on Twitter or like us on Facebook.

My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
jdryder
jdryder

The issue isn't whether it's justifiable.  Writers are writers.  As free citizens, they can and should expound upon anything they want. The real issue is, will readers hold it against a food writer if he or she writes about politics, religion or other hot button issues? Is it fair to judge or dislike a writer on one topic because we don't like his views on another?    (Do we listen to musicians whose views differ from ours?  Do we still go to the movies of actors whose politics we feel are wrong?)   The onus is on the consumer, not the creator.  For myself, a food writer can go on and on about politics and religion all they want and I won't hold it against them. However, keep the peas and potatoes separate.  Don't tell me how much you love / hate Obama / Romney / the Left / the Right in your food writing and we'll get along fine.  

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city