Spotify: The Honeymoon's Over

Categories: Free Music, Pop-Ed

L.J. Williamson
I cain't quit yew.
Last month I posed the question: Which Is Better: Spotify or Grooveshark? Though my comparison of the two music subscription services wasn't entirely conclusive, I reckoned that, in the end, "Grooveshark just has too many glitches, whereas if a track shows up on Spotify, you know it'll play. That means less futzing with the phone and more busting out the beats."

And, it's true. Hooking up with Spotify was as exciting as having a new lover. At first. Then, after we spent more and more time together, little cracks started to show. Little flaws that may not have seemed noticeable in the initial throes of that hot streaming passion were suddenly impossible to ignore.

Like any waning romance, my attention began to shift from everything Spotify had to everything it didn't. Nobody's perfect, of course, but Spotify really did promise us a rose garden, with all of their big talk about, "All the music. All the time." But would a rose garden smell as sweet if it didn't include "Do You Wanna Touch Me" by Joan Jett?

Discovering that omission was, to me, the first big chink in Spotify's shining armor. I could forgive it not having Malcolm McLaren's 1994 concept album Paris -- it's a bit obscure. Hmm, Mercury Rev's The Secret Migration was missing here too? Oh well. No Beatles, no biggie -- everyone knows those guys write their own rules. And though the notice that the L.A. heavy metal label Century Media pulled its songs off of Spotify gave me some pause, I'm not the biggest metal fan.

But I was out and out offended when Spotify tried to convince me that Joan Jett And The Blackhearts' biggest hit was a song called "Go Home." No, Spotify. You go home. And quit lying to me. It just makes you sound stupid.

Enter the act's name differently and you'll get a different -- though no less inaccurate --answer. The biggest hit by Joan Jett Ampersand The Blackhearts? "I Hate Myself For Loving You." That's exactly what I said to myself now, as it had dawned on me that Spotify's marketing slogans were nothing but sleazy pickup lines. Seeing that Spotify tried to deny the existence of a little song called "I Love Rock 'n Roll," one of the biggest hits of the '80s, the honeymoon was definitely over.

Spotify cites the lack of licensing agreements for the omission of certain artists, but there seems to be no rhyme or reason to the pattern of gaping holes, especially when compared to other streaming music sites. For example, in an interview, Adele's label called Spotify one of their "top digital partners globally by revenue." Okay, so why then does Spotify not have Adele's album 21, when Rdio, MOG, and Rhapsody do?

My Voice Nation Help
12 comments
Faza (TCM)
Faza (TCM)

To clear up the Grooveshark matter - the reason they have stuff Spotify doesn't is that they don't bother to ask permission first, hiding behind the "DMCA is an alibi" school of legal thought. So far, it has worked.

A copyright holder has essentially three choices with Grooveshark:1. Agree to license music on Grooveshark's terms,2. Sue, then settle (what EMI did and UMG will probably end up doing)3. Shrug and move on.

In none of those cases is "not have their music on Grooveshark" an option.

JL
JL

If a particular song is not on Spotify it's because the artist and/or copyright owner has not agreed to the usage. How is that Spotify's fault?

Spotify takes away from people buying physical product. That's why many indie labels won't license their catalogs. Their in the business of selling records. But the reality is streaming services are the future of music. Spotify puts money in the pockets of artists and songwriters. If it cuts down on illegal downloading I'll all for itALSO...if Pink Floyd's music appears on other streaming services I can assure you it's on there illegally. It took a lot of negotiating to get their music on iTunes because the band didn't want their songs sold separately. 

.

Emma Aistrop
Emma Aistrop

 I love Spotif!! They must have heard your complaint as they have 3 album listings of Adele's 21 lol! If you haven't had a chance to try it, my friend forwarded me a link for a free version...http://open.spotify.com/user/myplay.c.... Be sure to also sign up for the College 101 Playlist, it's where I've found a ton of new music :)

OnionSoup
OnionSoup

Interesting piece. I have used Grooveshark quite a bit over the past year or so. 

When Spotify launched I expected it to be a gamer changer but the I still find myself going back to Grooveshark because the sound quality is better. 

I want to love Spotify but I just like it.

bkbroiler
bkbroiler

Spotify does have Adele's 21...

sta303
sta303

you seem to be from a different planet. it has 19 but not 21

Vevofan1342
Vevofan1342

grooveshark is illegal.  

It doesn't pay music royalties.  

Nick
Nick

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...Grooveshark users upload the songs and other users listen to them. It's like all the unofficial fan music videos on YouTube that also don't pay licensing to the copyright holders.

Meredith
Meredith

yep, entirely untrue. legal federal law. federal. 

and pays loyalties to 1000s of labels, indie and major.

jorgene
jorgene

US federal law applies in the US only. Over in Europe, many rights organisations don't receive a sinle cent from Grooveshark, since there are no agreements what so ever. Spotify? Legal from day one, and it has now become a major source of revenue, for both artists and labels.

Michael Hart
Michael Hart

If only instead of filling out DMCA letter after DMCA letter, they could just strike up a deal like the other labels have. Oh wait, that'd make too much sense. If you're not getting paid for your content, you're an idiot (the companies, not "you") for not seeking further deals. A little money is better than no money, plus think of all the time/money saved sending those DMCA letters.

That said, Grooveshark operates the same way YouTube does. People upload music illegally to YouTube all the time; the large labels have access to Google's copyright protection/monetization methods through affiliate websites (iTunes, Amazon, etc), while many small labels are settling for just sending DMCA letters.

To all of those stupid companies, all I can say is this: "Wake up and smell the coffee you freaking morons." Don't send DMCA letters, send content licensing deals.

ScienceBitch
ScienceBitch

Actually they have agreements with several labels. 

From the Vault

 

Clubs

Los Angeles Event Tickets
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city